Magnetic Properties Identification by Using a Bi-Objective Optimal Multi-Fidelity Neural Network

In order to identify the magnetic properties of magnetic steel, the synergy between the data arising from the experimental activity, an FE model, and the use of a multi-fidelity surrogate could relieve the burden of the total cost. A neural network, with as many outputs as fidelity levels, is adopted in quality of metamodel to describe the forward problem [forward neural network (FNN)]. FNN is trained using multiple losses aiming at getting a robust surrogate that is poorly sensitive to the chosen norm. This makes it bi-objective optimal since several error metrics are simultaneously minimized. In addition, a conjugate, inverse net (INNCJ) is built, which is a ready-to-use tool for inverse properties identification, since no optimization runs are required. Its performances are compared to those obtained with a transfer learning-based approach (INNTR) and a single-fidelity inverse neural network (INNSF). Finally, a real $B - H$ curve identification task has been solved, thereby validating the conjugate inverse net.

[1]  Zuqi Tang,et al.  Training Sample Selection Strategy Applied to CNN in Magneto-Thermal Coupled Analysis , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[2]  M. H. Ferri Aliabadi,et al.  A novel multi-fidelity modelling-based framework for reliability-based design optimisation of composite structures , 2020, Engineering with Computers.

[3]  Tobias Meisen,et al.  Transfer-Learning: Bridging the Gap between Real and Simulation Data for Machine Learning in Injection Molding , 2018 .

[4]  G. K. Miti,et al.  Neural network-based software tool for predicting magnetic performance of strip-wound magnetic cores at medium to high frequency , 2004 .

[5]  Wei Xing,et al.  Multi-Fidelity Bayesian Optimization via Deep Neural Networks , 2020, NeurIPS.

[6]  Yan Wang,et al.  Multi-Fidelity Physics-Constrained Neural Network and Its Application in Materials Modeling , 2019, Journal of Mechanical Design.

[7]  M. E. Mognaschi,et al.  A benchmark problem of induction heating analysis , 2017 .

[8]  Luc Dupre,et al.  A Unified Electromagnetic Inverse Problem Algorithm for the Identification of the Magnetic Material Characteristics of Electromagnetic Devices Including Uncertainty Analysis: A Review and Application , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  Dimitris P. Labridis,et al.  Calculation of eddy current losses in nonlinear ferromagnetic materials , 1989 .

[10]  B. Nacke,et al.  Improving the Accuracy of FE Simulations of Induction Tempering Toward a Microstructure-Dependent Electromagnetic Model , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[11]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[12]  P. Di Barba,et al.  Automated B-H curve identification algorithm combining field simulation with optimisation methods and exploiting parallel computation , 2012 .