Strength and Stiffness of Circular Concrete-Filled Tubes

Concrete-filled tubes (CFTs) are composite structural members that consist of a steel tube and concrete infill. CFTs optimize the contributions of both components by improving their geometric efficiency and fully using their inherent strengths. The concrete infill is confined by the steel tube, resulting in a triaxial state of compression that increases the strength and strain capacity of the concrete. The perimeter steel is at its optimal location, and the concrete infill delays local and global buckling of the tube. CFTs are easily and rapidly constructed and provide significant compression, bending, and shear resistance. They may be used for bridge piers and building columns. However, current design specifications for CFTs vary significantly, thereby limiting the current understanding and use of these components. This study addresses combined axial and flexural loading and determines the best models for predicting the stiffness and resistance of circular CFT. A database of 122 test specimens was compiled and evaluated. The results indicate that the plastic stress method is a simple yet effective method to predict the resistance of circular CFT components under combined loading. These data show that current specifications provide inaccurate predictions of the flexural stiffness, and a new stiffness expression is proposed. The proposed models permit simple yet accurate predictions of stiffness and resistance and allow engineers to use CFT components routinely in structural design.

[1]  Raphael H. Grzebieta,et al.  Concrete-filled circular steel tubes subjected to pure bending , 2001 .

[2]  Hiroyoshi Tokinoya,et al.  Behavior of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Beam Columns , 2004 .

[3]  Lin-Hai Han,et al.  Further Study on the Flexural Behaviour of Concrete-filled Steel Tubes , 2006 .

[4]  Toshiaki Fujimoto,et al.  BEHAVIOR OF ECCENTRICALLY LOADED CONCRETE-FILLED STEEL TUBULAR COLUMNS , 2004 .

[5]  James L Noland,et al.  Computer-Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project: Decision Logic Table Formulation of ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-77 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete for Automated Constraint Processing. Volume 1. , 1986 .

[6]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Low-Cycle Fatigue Damage of Circular Concrete-Filled-Tube Columns , 2009 .

[7]  Michel Bruneau,et al.  Cyclic Testing of Concrete-Filled Circular Steel Bridge Piers having Encased Fixed-Based Detail , 2004 .

[8]  Dennis Lam,et al.  Concrete-Filled Steel Tube Columns-Tests Compared with Eurocode 4 , 2011 .

[9]  Helmut G. L. Prion,et al.  Beam-column behaviour of steel tubes filled with high strength concrete , 1994 .

[10]  Atorod Azizinamini,et al.  Behavior and strength of circular concrete-filled tube columns , 2002 .

[11]  Richard W. Furlong,et al.  Strength of Steel-Encased Concrete Beam Columns , 1967 .

[12]  Kenji Sakino,et al.  Experimental Studies on CFT Column Systems - U.S.-Japan Cooperative Earthquake Research Program , 1997 .

[13]  J. Mander,et al.  Theoretical stress strain model for confined concrete , 1988 .

[14]  Charles W. Roeder,et al.  Composite Action in Concrete Filled Tubes , 1999 .

[15]  Russell Q. Bridge,et al.  DESIGN OF CIRCULAR THIN-WALLED CONCRETE FILLED STEEL TUBES , 2000 .

[16]  Philip F. Boyd,et al.  Seismic Performance of Steel-Encased Concrete Columns Under Flexural Loading , 1995 .