Isolation of mutations that disrupt cooperative DNA binding by the Drosophila bicoid protein.

Cooperative DNA binding is thought to contribute to the ability of the Drosophila melanogaster protein, Bicoid, to stimulate transcription of target genes in precise sub-domains within the embryo. As a first step toward testing this idea, we devised a genetic screen to isolate mutations in Bicoid that specifically disrupt cooperative interactions, but do not disrupt DNA recognition or transcription activation. The screen was carried out in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and 12 cooperativity mutants were identified. The mutations map across most of the Bicoid protein, with some located within the DNA-binding domain (homeodomain). Four homeodomain mutants were characterized in yeast and shown to activate a single-site reporter gene to levels comparable to that of wild-type, indicating that DNA binding per se is not affected. However, these mutants failed to show cooperative coupling between high and low-affinity sites, and showed reduced activation of a reporter gene carrying a natural Drosophila enhancer. Homology modeling indicated that none of the four mutations is in residues that contact DNA. Instead, these residues are likely to interact with other DNA-bound Bicoid monomers or other parts of the Bicoid protein. In vitro, the isolated homeodomains did not show strong cooperativity defects, supporting the idea that other regions of Bicoid are also important for cooperativity. This study describes the first systematic screen to identify cooperativity mutations in a eukaryotic DNA-binding protein.

[1]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  λ Repressor and cro—components of an efficient molecular switch , 1981, Nature.

[2]  T. Steitz,et al.  Cooperativity mutants of the γδ resolvase identify an essential interdimer interaction , 1990, Cell.

[3]  M. Ptashne,et al.  P22 repressor mutants deficient in co‐operative binding and DNA loop formation. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[4]  R. Mann,et al.  Extra specificity from extradenticle: the partnership between HOX and PBX/EXD homeodomain proteins. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[5]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Homeodomain-DNA recognition , 1994, Cell.

[6]  H. Zhong,et al.  The yeast alpha2 and Mcm1 proteins interact through a region similar to a motif found in homeodomain proteins of higher eukaryotes , 1996, Molecular and cellular biology.

[7]  Roger Brent,et al.  DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9 , 1989, Cell.

[8]  W. Zhu,et al.  Identification of drosophila bicoid-interacting proteins using a custom two-hybrid selection. , 2000, Gene.

[9]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  Organization of anterior pattern in the Drosophila embryo by the maternal gene bicoid , 1986, Nature.

[10]  D Bopp,et al.  The role of localization of bicoid RNA in organizing the anterior pattern of the Drosophila embryo. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[11]  R. Sauer,et al.  Isolation of lambda repressor mutants with defects in cooperative operator binding. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[12]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Self-association and DNA binding of lambda cI repressor N-terminal domains reveal linkage between sequence-specific binding and the C-terminal cooperativity domain. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[13]  M. A. Shea,et al.  The OR control system of bacteriophage lambda. A physical-chemical model for gene regulation. , 1985, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  G L Gilliland,et al.  Structural studies of the engrailed homeodomain , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[15]  P N Goodfellow,et al.  A Genetic Switch: Gene Control and Phage λ , 1987 .

[16]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Single-site mutations in the C-terminal domain of bacteriophage lambda cI repressor alter cooperative interactions between dimers adjacently bound to OR. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[17]  C. Desplan,et al.  Homeodomain Proteins: Cooperating to be different , 1995, Current Biology.

[18]  C. Dieffenbach,et al.  PCR primer: a laboratory manual. , 2003 .

[19]  P. Kraulis A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[20]  D. Picard,et al.  Fusion of GAL4-VP16 to a steroid-binding domain provides a tool for gratuitous induction of galactose-responsive genes in yeast. , 1993, Gene.

[21]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.

[22]  M. Ptashne,et al.  Control of transcription by the bacteriophage P22 repressor. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[23]  R. Brent,et al.  Specific DNA recognition and intersite spacing are critical for action of the bicoid morphogen , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[24]  T. Scarborough,et al.  The Drosophila morphogenetic protein Bicoid binds DNA cooperatively. , 1996, Development.

[25]  A. Hochschild,et al.  A genetic method for dissecting the mechanism of transcriptional activator synergy by identical activators. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  N. Guex,et al.  SWISS‐MODEL and the Swiss‐Pdb Viewer: An environment for comparative protein modeling , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[27]  M C Peitsch,et al.  ProMod and Swiss-Model: Internet-based tools for automated comparative protein modelling. , 1996, Biochemical Society transactions.

[28]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  The bicoid protein determines position in the Drosophila embryo in a concentration-dependent manner , 1988, Cell.

[29]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  R. Brent,et al.  A genetic model for interaction of the homeodomain recognition helix with DNA. , 1991, Science.

[31]  R. Parker,et al.  A rapid method for localized mutagenesis of yeast genes , 1992, Yeast.

[32]  Juli D. Klemm,et al.  Crystal structure of the Oct-1 POU domain bound to an octamer site: DNA recognition with tethered DNA-binding modules , 1994, Cell.

[33]  Jun Ma,et al.  Sequences Outside the Homeodomain of Bicoid Are Required for Protein-Protein Interaction* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[34]  Norbert Perrimon,et al.  Activation of posterior gap gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm , 1995, Nature.

[35]  R. Sikorski,et al.  A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1989, Genetics.

[36]  P. Youderian,et al.  Genetic selection for mutations that impair the co‐operative binding of lambda repressor , 1994, Molecular microbiology.

[37]  T. Ragoczy,et al.  Amino Acid Substitutions Reveal Distinct Functions of Serine 186 of the ZEBRA Protein in Activation of Early Lytic Cycle Genes and Synergy with the Epstein-Barr Virus R Transactivator , 1999, Journal of Virology.

[38]  Mark Ptashne,et al.  Interactions between DNA-bound repressors govern regulation by the λ phage repressor , 1979 .

[39]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  The bicoid protein is a positive regulator of hunchback transcription in the early Drosophila embryo , 1989, Nature.

[40]  C. Goutte,et al.  Yeast a1 and alpha 2 homeodomain proteins form a DNA-binding activity with properties distinct from those of either protein. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  D. Tautz,et al.  Autonomous concentration-dependent activation and repression of Krüppel by hunchback in the Drosophila embryo. , 1994, Development.

[42]  Jun Ma,et al.  A new class of yeast transcriptional activators , 1987, Cell.

[43]  J. W. Little,et al.  Mutations affecting cooperative DNA binding of phage HK022 CI repressor. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  J. W. Little,et al.  Highly cooperative DNA binding by the coliphage HK022 repressor. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  M. Bate,et al.  The development of Drosophila melanogaster , 1993 .

[46]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Cooperative DNA‐binding by Bicoid provides a mechanism for threshold‐dependent gene activation in the Drosophila embryo , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[47]  G. K. Ackers,et al.  Self-assembly of bacteriophage lambda cI repressor: effects of single-site mutations on the monomer-dimer equilibrium. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[48]  Carl O. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 Å resolution: A framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions , 1990, Cell.

[49]  Donald F. Senear,et al.  [9] Quantitative DNase footprint titration: A method for studying protein-DNA interactions , 1986 .

[50]  K. Struhl,et al.  The gradient morphogen bicoid is a concentration-dependent transcriptional activator , 1989, Cell.

[51]  Roger Brent,et al.  C dil, a Human Gl and S Phase Protein Phosphatase That Associates with Cdk2 , 2003 .

[52]  C. Nüsslein-Volhard,et al.  A gradient of bicoid protein in Drosophila embryos , 1988, Cell.

[53]  A. Hochschild,et al.  Specificity determinants for the interaction of lambda repressor and P22 repressor dimers. , 1994, Genes & development.

[54]  Wolfgang Driever,et al.  Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the bicoid morphogen , 1989, Nature.

[55]  Diethard Tautz,et al.  Finger protein of novel structure encoded by hunchback, a second member of the gap class of Drosophila segmentation genes , 1987, Nature.

[56]  M. A. Shea,et al.  Free energy coupling within macromolecules. The chemical work of ligand binding at the individual sites in co-operative systems. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[57]  R. Sauer,et al.  Transcription factors: structural families and principles of DNA recognition. , 1992, Annual review of biochemistry.

[58]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Yeast repressor alpha 2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1 , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[59]  J. Iñiguez-Lluhí,et al.  A Common Motif within the Negative Regulatory Regions of Multiple Factors Inhibits Their Transcriptional Synergy , 2000, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[60]  D. Duboule Guidebook to the homeobox genes , 1994 .

[61]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Interaction between two homeodomain proteins is specified by a short C-terminal tail , 1994, Nature.

[62]  A. Johnson,et al.  Molecular mechanisms of cell-type determination in budding yeast. , 1995, Current opinion in genetics & development.