An analysis of users’ preferences on learning management systems: a case on German versus Spanish students

The recent advancements in information and communication technologies have altered instructional contexts and re-shaped them into smart learning environments. One of the most common practices of these environments are learning management systems (LMS) where the learners and instructors utilize a software platform to fulfill, support and manage instructional activities around predefined objectives. Successful implementations of LMS have brought a variety on its usage from different cultures, genders, age groups or schooling levels. Hence, this study focuses on understanding the role of culture on LMS design, in along with the effects of gender, age and school year variables. The study participants were German ( n  = 83) and Spanish (n = 83) university students attending a fully online course offered by a South Korean university. At the end of the course, the students were asked to fulfill a survey on effective LMS design by pointing which features of LMS were more important for them. The survey included twenty questions on four major design factors; content management (six items), ease of use (five items), communication within LMS (four item) and screen design (five items). The dataset was analyzed by non-parametric statistical techniques around four variables on four dimensions (and their related survey questions). The most important result was insufficiency of one unique LMS design for all students which demonstrates the necessity of student demographics tailored smart systems. Additionally, age and gender variables were not making significant differences on LMS design as much as culture and school year variables. The study also revealed that while German students would appreciate goal-oriented individual learning, Spanish students would value process-oriented group learning with active communication. Furthermore, many features of LMS were highly valued by the freshman students more than other levels. The paper discusses these variables with possible explanations from the literature and depicts implementations for future design practices.

[1]  Jane P. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm , 2010 .

[2]  Xiaohui Liu,et al.  Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model , 2017, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[3]  Norman E. Wallen,et al.  How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education , 1990 .

[4]  Hermann Astleitner,et al.  Are there gender differences in web-based learning? An integrated model and related effect sizes , 2005 .

[5]  Mohammed Nasiru Yakubu,et al.  The Effect of Quality Antecedents on the Acceptance of Learning Management Systems: A Case of Two Private Universities in Nigeria , 2019 .

[6]  Ahmed Al-Azawei,et al.  THE MODERATING EFFECT OF GENDER DIFFERENCES ON LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (LMSS) ACCEPTANCE: A MULTI-GROUP ANALYSIS , 2019 .

[7]  Daniel J. Denis SPSS Data Analysis for Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Statistics , 2018 .

[8]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1991 .

[9]  Yanyan Sheng,et al.  Is Coefficient Alpha Robust to Non-Normal Data? , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[10]  Peter Bruestle Doing E-Learning/Doing Gender?Examining the Relationship between Students' Gender Concepts and E-learning Technology , 2009 .

[11]  Tanja Adamus Gender and E-Tutoring A Concept for Gender Sensitive E-Tutor Training Programs , 2009 .

[12]  Hilary Hollingsworth Cultural differences in teaching and learning , 2013 .

[13]  Alma T. Mintu Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[14]  María-Eugenia Ruiz-Molina,et al.  Are there gender differences in e-learning use and assessment? Evidence from an interuniversity online project in Europe , 2010 .

[15]  Patrick Parrish,et al.  Cultural Dimensions of Learning: Addressing the Challenges of Multicultural Instruction , 2010 .

[16]  Ellen Meier,et al.  Different but similar: computer use patterns between young Korean males and females , 2011 .

[17]  Ji Won You,et al.  Identifying significant indicators using LMS data to predict course achievement in online learning , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[18]  Stephen Asunka,et al.  Helping Faculty Overcome Cultural Barriers to Adoption and Use of Web-Based Learning Technologies: A Participatory Action Research Approach , 2016 .

[19]  Cynthia E. Glidden How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (2nd ed.). , 1993 .

[20]  S. Young,et al.  Does gender matter in online learning , 2001 .

[21]  Clemens Bechter,et al.  Cultural Features of e-Learning A Euro-Asian Case Study , 2010 .

[22]  Anthony Neil Hunt,et al.  Cultural Dimensions of Learning in Online Teacher Education Courses , 2015, Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning.

[23]  David Jones,et al.  Indicators of engagement , 2010 .

[24]  K. Praveen Parboteeah,et al.  On‐line course design and delivery: cross‐national considerations , 2004 .

[25]  Lisa Anne Bove,et al.  Learning Strategies for Faculty During a Learning Management System Migration , 2020 .

[26]  Ian Douglas,et al.  MEASURING STUDENT PARTICIPATION AND EFFORT , 2007 .

[27]  Xiaojing Liu,et al.  Cultural Differences in Online Learning: International Student Perceptions , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..