Functional Responses and Interference within and between Year Classes of a Dragonfly Population

In a laboratory study of the dragonfly Tetragoneuria cynosura (Say) (Odonata: Corduliidae), we measured the feeding rates of second-year-class larvae (Tc2) as a function of Tc2 density and of the density of their first-year-class conspecific prey (Tc1). The experiments were conducted for 24 hr in small, structurally simple, cylindrical plastic aquaria within a controlled environment chamber under a 14L:10D photoperiod. The resulting functional response to prey density followed the decelerated curve (type 2) typical of many predators. Strong feeding interference among Tc2 larvae was indicated by an inverse relationship between feeding rate and predator density. Since we detected no effects of Tc1 or Tc2 densities on movement by larvae within aquaria, density-specific differences in movement probably cannot account for the observed interference. Both a distraction model (in which prey and predators "compete" for the predator's attention) and a pre-emption model (in which interference takes precedence over feeding) fit the data reasonably well. Our laboratory results suggest that the structural complexity and alternative prey present in a previous field study greatly reduced the rate of predation by Tc2 on Tc1 larvae but did not reduce the intensity of interference among Tc2 predators.

[1]  G. Salt,et al.  Predator and Prey Densities as Controls of the Rate of Capture by the Predator Didinium Nasutum , 1974 .

[2]  Arthur C. Benke,et al.  COMPARATIVE DYNAMICS AND LIFE HISTORIES OF COEXISTING DRAGONFLY POPULATIONS , 1975 .

[3]  C. S. Holling.  The functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density , 1966 .

[4]  Laurel R. Fox,et al.  Cannibalism in Natural Populations , 1975 .

[5]  Philip H. Crowley,et al.  PREY DEPLETION BY ODONATE LARVAE: COMBINING EVIDENCE FROM MULTIPLE FIELD EXPERIMENTS' , 1987 .

[6]  A. Sih.  The Behavioral Response Race Between Predator and Prey , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[7]  A Sih,et al.  Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? , 1980, Science.

[8]  Andrew Sih,et al.  Foraging Strategies and the Avoidance of Predation by an Aquatic Insect, Notonecta Hoffmanni , 1982 .

[9]  D. J. Thompson.  Regulation of damseifly populations: the effects of weed density on larval mortality due to predation , 1987 .

[10]  P. Crowley,et al.  Behavior and Ecological Interactions of Larval Odonata , 1985 .

[11]  P. Crowley,et al.  Contests between larval damselflies: empirical steps toward a better ESS model , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  P. A. Heads.  The effect of invertebrate and vertebrate predators on the foraging movements of Ischnura elegans larvae (Odonata: Zygoptera) , 1985 .

[13]  S. Wissinger.  Effects of food availability on larval development and inter-instar predation among larvae of Libellula lydia and Libellula luctuosa (Odonata: Anisoptera) , 1988 .

[14]  G. Polis,et al.  The Evolution and Dynamics of Intraspecific Predation , 1981 .

[15]  D. McQueen,et al.  Reduction of Zooplankton Standing Stocks by Predaceous Cyclops bicuspidatus thomasi in Marion Lake, British Columbia , 1969 .

[16]  P. Crowley.  Evolutionarily Stable Strategies for Larval Dragonflies , 1984 .

[17]  M. Hassell,et al.  General models for insect parasite and predator searching behaviour: interference , 1974 .

[18]  James V. Robinson,et al.  Mutual Predation in Assembled Communities of Odonate Species , 1987 .