Workshop Tutorials: Accommodating Student-Centered Learning in Large First Year University Physics Courses.

In 1995, cooperative learning tutorials were introduced into large first year physics classes at the University of Sydney. This paper describes the effect of these cooperative learning tutorials, called Workshop Tutorials, on student learning from both a quantitative and qualitative point of view. It was found that students attending more than half the total number of tutorials scored significantly better over the year than those attending less than half. Student reaction was almost wholly positive, with particular mention made of the voluntary nature of the tutorials as well as the use of practical, 'hands on' demonstrations within the tutorials.

[1]  Alan Van Heuvelen,et al.  Overview, Case Study Physics , 1991 .

[2]  Ronald K. Thornton,et al.  Assessing student learning of Newton’s laws: The Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation and the Evaluation of Active Learning Laboratory and Lecture Curricula , 1998 .

[3]  M. Ferguson-Hessler,et al.  Cognitive structures of good and poor novice problem solvers in physics , 1986 .

[4]  G. Andaloro,et al.  A computer‐based learning environment in the field of Newtonian mechanics , 1997 .

[5]  P. W. Laws,et al.  Millikan Lecture 1996: Promoting active learning based on physics education research in introductory physics courses , 1997 .

[6]  Sheila Tobias,et al.  They're Not Dumb. They're Different.: A New “Tier of Talent” for Science , 1990 .

[7]  Richard T. White,et al.  Students' perceptions of teaching and learning in first-year university physics , 1995 .

[8]  Arnold B. Arons.  Phenomenology and logical reasoning in introductory physics courses , 1982 .

[9]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 1: Group versus individual problem solving , 1992 .

[10]  Robert J. Dufresne,et al.  Promoting skilled problem‐solving behavior among beginning physics students , 1993 .

[11]  Richard Zajchowski,et al.  Differences in the problem solving of stronger and weaker novices in physics: Knowledge, strategies, or knowledge structure? , 1993 .

[12]  J. Renner.  Significant physics content and intellectual development—cognitive development as a result of interacting with physics content , 1976 .

[13]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  Guided, Cooperative Learning and Individual Knowledge Acquisition , 2018, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[14]  The peer interview about complex events: a new method for the investigation of preinstructional knowledge , 1996 .

[15]  Richard R. Hake.  Promoting student crossover to the Newtonian world , 1987 .

[16]  F. Reif,et al.  Effects of Knowledge Organization on Task Performance , 1984 .

[17]  Wolff‐Michael Roth,et al.  Staging Aristotle and natural observation against Galileo and (stacked) scientific experiment or physics lectures as rhetorical events , 1996 .

[18]  L. McDermott.  Research on conceptual understanding in mechanics , 1984 .

[19]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[20]  Michael Prosser,et al.  The “How” and “What” of learning physics , 1989 .

[21]  David E. Brown.  Facilitating conceptual change using analogies and explanatory models , 1994 .

[22]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Learning through collaborative computer simulations , 1992, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[23]  Patricia A. Heller,et al.  Teaching problem solving through cooperative grouping. Part 2: Designing problems and structuring groups , 1992 .