Perceived gaze direction in faces and spatial attention: a study in patients with parietal damage and unilateral neglect

Perceived gaze in faces is an important social signal that may influence orienting of attention in normal observers. Would such effects of gaze still occur in patients with right parietal damage and left neglect who usually fail to attend to contralesional space? Two experiments tested for effects of perceived gaze on visual extinction. Face or shape stimuli were presented in the right, left, or both hemifields, with faces looking either straight ahead or toward the opposite field. On bilateral trials, patients extinguished a left shape much less often when a concurrent right face looked leftward rather than straight ahead. This occurred, even though gaze was not relevant to the task and processing of facial signals implied attention to a competing ipsilesional stimulus. By contrast, rightward gaze in faces presented on the left side had no effect on extinction, suggesting that gaze cues are not extracted without attention. Two other experiments examined effects of perceived gaze on the detection of peripheral targets. Targets appeared at one of four possible locations to the right or left of a central face looking either toward the target location, another location on the same side, the opposite side, or straight ahead. Face and gaze were not relevant to the task and not predictive of target location. Patients responded faster when the face looked toward the target on both the contralesional and ipsilesional sides. In contralesional space, gaze allowed shifting of attention in a specific quadrant direction, but only to the first target along the scan path when there were different possible locations on the same side. By contrast, in intact ipsilesional space, attention was selectively directed to one among different eccentric locations. Control experiments showed that symbolic arrow cues did not produce similar effects. These results indicate that even though parietal damage causes spatial neglect and impairs the representation of location on the contralesional side, perceived gaze in faces can still trigger automatic shifts of attention in the contralesional direction, suggesting the existence of specific and anatomically distinct attentional mechanisms.

[1]  Michael Morales,et al.  Following the direction of gaze and language development in 6-month-olds , 1998 .

[2]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  FACIAL ORGANIZATION BLOCKS ACCESS TO LOW-LEVEL FEATURES: AN OBJECT INFERIORITY EFFECT , 1995 .

[3]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Components of Visual Orienting in Early Infancy: Contingency Learning, Anticipatory Looking, and Disengaging , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Murray White,et al.  Preattentive analysis of facial expressions of emotion , 1995 .

[5]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Gaze detection and the cortical processing of faces: Evidence from infants and adults , 1995 .

[7]  N. Soroker,et al.  Coordinate Frame for Pattern Recognition in Unilateral Spatial Neglect , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. V. von Grünau,et al.  The Detection of Gaze Direction: A Stare-In-The-Crowd Effect , 1995, Perception.

[9]  R. Rafal,et al.  Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  M. Posner,et al.  How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention? , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  J. Decety,et al.  Brain Regions Involved in the Perception of Gaze: A PET Study , 1998, NeuroImage.

[12]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  D. Muir,et al.  Infant sensitivity to adult eye direction. , 1996, Child development.

[14]  Robert Ward,et al.  Differences Between Objects and Nonobjects in Visual Extinction: A Competition for Attention , 1996 .

[15]  J. Flavell,et al.  Young children's knowledge about visual perception: Lines of sight must be straight , 1991 .

[16]  M. Mesulam,et al.  From sensation to cognition. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  Jon Driver,et al.  Grouping reduces visual extinction: Neuropsychological evidence for weight-linkage in visual selection , 1994 .

[18]  C. Kleinke.  Gaze and eye contact: a research review. , 1986, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  B H Price,et al.  Dissociated perceptual-sensory and exploratory-motor neglect. , 1992, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[20]  R. Rafal,et al.  "Both" means more than "two": localizing and counting in patients with visuospatial neglect , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  W. Braud,et al.  Reactions to an unseen gaze (remote attention): a review, with new data on autonomic staring detection , 1993 .

[23]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Preattentive Processes Guide Visual Search: Evidence from Patients with Unilateral Visual Neglect , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  L C Robertson,et al.  Covert orienting biases in scene-based reference frames: orientation priming and visual field differences. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  D. Maurer,et al.  Developmental changes in the scanning of faces by young infants. , 1976, Child development.

[26]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Reflexive Joint Attention Depends on Lateralized Cortical Connections , 2000, Psychological science.

[27]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  J. Bruner,et al.  The capacity for joint visual attention in the infant , 1975, Nature.

[29]  A. Cowey,et al.  Sensitivity to eye gaze in prosopagnosic patients and monkeys with superior temporal sulcus ablation , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  M. Goldberg,et al.  The representation of visual salience in monkey parietal cortex , 1998, Nature.

[31]  Aina Puce,et al.  Occipitotemporal Activity Elicited by Viewing Eye Movements: A Magnetoencephalographic Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  L. Brothers,et al.  Response of neurons in the macaque amygdala to complex social stimuli , 1990, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Social signals analyzed at the single cell level : someone is looking at me, something touched me, something moved! , 1990 .

[35]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[36]  M. Farah,et al.  Unconscious perception of “extinguished” visual stimuli: Reassessing the evidence , 1991, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  G. Butterworth,et al.  What minds have in common is space : Spatial mechanisms serving joint visual attention in infancy , 1991 .

[38]  Jon Driver,et al.  Adult's Eyes Trigger Shifts of Visual Attention in Human Infants , 1998 .

[39]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[40]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Mental Representation in Unilateral Neglect and Related Disorders: The Twentieth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[41]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Emotional facial expressions capture attention , 2001, Neurology.

[42]  A. D. Milner,et al.  Neglect, Extinction, and the Cortical Streams of Visual Processing , 1997 .

[43]  A. Mack.  Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[44]  A. Young,et al.  Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Peter Thier,et al.  Parietal Lobe Contributions to Orientation in 3D Space , 1997 .

[46]  A. Kingstone,et al.  The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze , 1998 .

[47]  Giacomo Rizzolatti,et al.  Visual Processing without Awareness: Evidence from Unilateral Neglect , 1992, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[48]  Jon Driver,et al.  Object segmentation and visual neglect , 1995, Behavioural Brain Research.

[49]  G Vallar,et al.  Anatomical correlates of visual and tactile extinction in humans: a clinical CT scan study. , 1994, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[50]  M. B. Bender,et al.  Phenomena of fluctuation, extinction and completion in visual perception. , 1946, Archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[51]  K. Nakamura,et al.  The human amygdala plays an important role in gaze monitoring. A PET study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  A rehabilitation study of hemispatial neglect , 1994 .

[53]  M. Argyle,et al.  Gaze and Mutual Gaze , 1994, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[54]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Gaze Perception Triggers Reflexive Visuospatial Orienting , 1999 .

[55]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  The Influence of Center of Mass Effect on the Distribution of Spatial Attention in the Vertical and Horizontal Dimensions , 1997, Brain and Cognition.

[56]  E. De Renzi,et al.  An experimental investigation on the nature of extinction. , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[57]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Faces call for attention: evidence from patients with visual extinction , 2000, Neuropsychologia.