International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH

Innovation diffusion theory provides a useful perspective on one of the most persistently challenging topics in the IT field, namely, how to improve technology assessment, adoption and implementation. For this reason, diffusion is growing in popularity as a reference theory for empirical studies of information technology adoption and diffusion, although no comprehensive review of this body of work has been published to date. This paper presents the results of a critical review of eighteen empirical studies published during the period 1981-1991. Conclusive results were most likely when the adoption context closely matched the contexts in which classical diffusion theory was developed (for example, individual adoption of personal-use technologies), or when researchers extended diffusion theory to account for new factors specific to the IT adoption context under study. Based on classical diffusion theory and other recent conceptual work, a framework is developed to guide future research in IT diffusion. The framework maps two classes of technology (ones that conform closely to classical diffusion assumptions versus ones that do not) against locus of adoption (individual versus organizational), resulting in four IT adoption contexts. For each adoption context, variables impacting adoption and diffusion are identified. Additionally, directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  Information Technology Implementation Research , 1990 .

[2]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology , 1988 .

[3]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[4]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1987 AN EXAMINATION OF MANAGERIAL STRATEGIES FOR INCREASING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY PENETRATION IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2017 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[6]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  Diffusion in computing networks: the case of BITNET , 1990, Commun. ACM.

[7]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .

[8]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[9]  Paul Ati ' Ewell.  TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING: THE CASE OF BUSINESS COMPUTING* , 1992 .

[10]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[11]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[12]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[13]  Louis E. Raho,et al.  Assimilating New Technology into the Organization: An Assessment of McFarlan and McKenney's Model , 1987, MIS Q..

[14]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[15]  Dorothy Leon Ard-Barton.  Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations , 1988 .

[16]  Judy Bayer,et al.  A critique of diffusion theory as a managerial framework for understanding adoption of software engineering innovations , 1989, [1988] Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Volume II: Software track.

[17]  Michael J. Ginzberg,et al.  Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions , 1981 .

[18]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  The case for integrative innovation: an expert system at Digital , 1993 .

[19]  Vijay Gurbaxani,et al.  An Integrative Model of Information Systems Spending Growth , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[21]  Joseph Farrell and Garth Saloner..  Competition, Compatibility and Standards: The Economics of Horses, Penguins and Lemmings , 1986 .

[22]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[23]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  Tae Hyoung Kwon,et al.  A Diffusion of Innovation Approach to MIS Infusion: Conceptualization, Methodology, and Management Strategies , 1990, ICIS.

[25]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[26]  Robert A. Peterson,et al.  Models for innovation diffusion , 1985 .

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward a “Critical Mass” Theory of Interactive Media , 1987 .

[28]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[29]  Leslie D. Ball,et al.  Identifying early adopters of large software systems , 1987, DATB.

[30]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Competitive Effects on Technology Diffusion , 1986 .

[31]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[33]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementing Structured Software Methodologies: A Case of Innovation in Process Technology , 1987 .

[34]  Sid L. Huff,et al.  Managing Micro Proliferation , 1989 .

[35]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..