Super-Resolution Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Methodology for the Identification of In Vivo Vascular Dynamics in 2D

Objectives The aim of this study was to provide an ultrasound-based super-resolution methodology that can be implemented using clinical 2-dimensional ultrasound equipment and standard contrast-enhanced ultrasound modes. In addition, the aim is to achieve this for true-to-life patient imaging conditions, including realistic examination times of a few minutes and adequate image penetration depths that can be used to scan entire organs without sacrificing current super-resolution ultrasound imaging performance. Methods Standard contrast-enhanced ultrasound was used along with bolus or infusion injections of SonoVue (Bracco, Geneva, Switzerland) microbubble (MB) suspensions. An image analysis methodology, translated from light microscopy algorithms, was developed for use with ultrasound contrast imaging video data. New features that are tailored for ultrasound contrast image data were developed for MB detection and segmentation, so that the algorithm can deal with single and overlapping MBs. The method was tested initially on synthetic data, then with a simple microvessel phantom, and then with in vivo ultrasound contrast video loops from sheep ovaries. Tracks detailing the vascular structure and corresponding velocity map of the sheep ovary were reconstructed. Images acquired from light microscopy, optical projection tomography, and optical coherence tomography were compared with the vasculature network that was revealed in the ultrasound contrast data. The final method was applied to clinical prostate data as a proof of principle. Results Features of the ovary identified in optical modalities mentioned previously were also identified in the ultrasound super-resolution density maps. Follicular areas, follicle wall, vessel diameter, and tissue dimensions were very similar. An approximately 8.5-fold resolution gain was demonstrated in vessel width, as vessels of width down to 60 μm were detected and verified (λ = 514 μm). Best agreement was found between ultrasound measurements and optical coherence tomography with 10% difference in the measured vessel widths, whereas ex vivo microscopy measurements were significantly lower by 43% on average. The results were mostly achieved using video loops of under 2-minute duration that included respiratory motion. A feasibility study on a human prostate showed good agreement between density and velocity ultrasound maps with the histological evaluation of the location of a tumor. Conclusions The feasibility of a 2-dimensional contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based super-resolution method was demonstrated using in vitro, synthetic and in vivo animal data. The method reduces the examination times to a few minutes using state-of-the-art ultrasound equipment and can provide super-resolution maps for an entire prostate with similar resolution to that achieved in other studies.

[1]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Super-Resolution Ultrasound Localization Microscopy Through Deep Learning , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[2]  V Sboros,et al.  The acoustic signature of decaying resonant phospholipid microbubbles , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Alan H. Greenaway,et al.  An adaptive non-local means filter for denoising live-cell images and improving particle detection , 2010, Journal of structural biology.

[4]  W. McDicken,et al.  Acoustic Rayleigh scattering at individual micron-sized bubbles , 2007 .

[5]  Y. Chung,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: advance and current status in abdominal imaging , 2014, Ultrasonography.

[6]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parametric Maps to Evaluate Intratumoral Vascularization , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[7]  T. Helbich,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2018, Investigative radiology.

[8]  Georg Schmitz,et al.  Detection and Tracking of Multiple Microbubbles in Ultrasound B-Mode Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[9]  W. McDicken,et al.  The acoustic response from individual attached and unattached rigid shelled microbubbles , 2008 .

[10]  W N McDicken,et al.  The behaviour of individual contrast agent microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  T. Helbich,et al.  Quantitative Multiparametric Breast Ultrasound: Application of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound and Elastography Leads to an Improved Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Lesions , 2019, Investigative radiology.

[12]  Nathalie Lassau,et al.  Validation of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Predicting Outcomes of Antiangiogenic Therapy for Solid Tumors , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[13]  Dean Y. Huang,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in abdominal intervention , 2018, Abdominal Radiology.

[14]  D. Kaplan,et al.  On the statistical characteristics of log-compressed Rayleigh signals: theoretical formulation and experimental results , 1993 .

[15]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Resolving Ultrasound Contrast Microbubbles Using Minimum Variance Beamforming , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Lei Yang,et al.  A New Framework for Particle Detection in Low-SNR Fluorescence Live-Cell Images and Its Application for Improved Particle Tracking , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  M. Butler,et al.  On the acoustic response of microbubbles in arteriole sized vessels , 2011 .

[18]  G. Schmitz,et al.  Reconstruction of flow velocity inside vessels by tracking single microbubbles with an MCMC data association algorithm , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[19]  Wei Yang,et al.  Focal Liver Lesions: Can SonoVue-Enhanced Ultrasound Be Used to Differentiate Malignant From Benign Lesions? , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[20]  P. Borowicz,et al.  Vascular perfusion with fluorescent labeled lectin to study ovarian functions. , 2013, Acta histochemica.

[21]  D O Cosgrove,et al.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: a review of sources of variability , 2011, Interface Focus.

[22]  A. Ng,et al.  Resolution in ultrasound imaging , 2011 .

[23]  Mairead Butler,et al.  Automatic dissociation between microvasculature and larger vessels for ultrasound contrast imaging , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  W. McDicken,et al.  An in vitro study of a microbubble contrast agent using a clinical ultrasound imaging system. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  A. Mcneilly,et al.  Imaging of the ovine corpus luteum microcirculation with contrast ultrasound. , 2011, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[26]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Multimodality imaging and mathematical modelling of drug delivery to glioblastomas , 2016, Interface Focus.

[27]  A. Leong,et al.  Newer developments in immunohistology , 2006, Journal of Clinical Pathology.

[28]  D. Staub,et al.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound: clinical applications in patients with atherosclerosis , 2015, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[29]  C Dunsby,et al.  Acoustic super-resolution with ultrasound and microbubbles , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[30]  T. Olsen,et al.  Shrinkage of cutaneous specimens: formalin or other factors involved? , 2008, Journal of cutaneous pathology.

[31]  B. Asselain,et al.  Study of Intrapatient Variability and Reproducibility of Quantitative Tumor Perfusion Parameters Evaluated With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[32]  J. Hossack,et al.  Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[33]  François Tranquart,et al.  First-in-Human Ultrasound Molecular Imaging With a VEGFR2-Specific Ultrasound Molecular Contrast Agent (BR55) in Prostate Cancer: A Safety and Feasibility Pilot Study , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[34]  A. Nunn,et al.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Transient Acute Myocardial Ischemia With a Clinically Translatable P- and E-Selectin Targeted Contrast Agent: Correlation With the Expression of Selectins , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[35]  John A Hossack,et al.  The Use of Acoustic Radiation Force Decorrelation-Weighted Pulse Inversion for Enhanced Ultrasound Contrast Imaging , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[36]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  The “quasi-stable” lipid shelled microbubble in response to consecutive ultrasound pulses , 2012 .

[37]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Improved Super-Resolution Ultrasound Microvessel Imaging With Spatiotemporal Nonlocal Means Filtering and Bipartite Graph-Based Microbubble Tracking , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[38]  F. S. George,et al.  Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment, 2nd ed. , 2012 .

[39]  C. Dunsby,et al.  3-D In Vitro Acoustic Super-Resolution and Super-Resolved Velocity Mapping Using Microbubbles , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[40]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  > Replace This Line with Your Paper Identification Number (double-click Here to Edit) < , 2022 .

[41]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[42]  R. High,et al.  Improvements in Cerebral Blood Flow and Recanalization Rates With Transcranial Diagnostic Ultrasound and Intravenous Microbubbles After Acute Cerebral Emboli , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[43]  W. Shi,et al.  The Thrombolytic Effect of Diagnostic Ultrasound–Induced Microbubble Cavitation in Acute Carotid Thromboembolism , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[44]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Acoustic detection of microbubble resonance , 2009 .

[45]  Elizabeth B. Herbst,et al.  Ultrasound Molecular Imaging of Inflammation in Mouse Abdominal Aorta , 2017, Investigative radiology.

[46]  M. Arditi,et al.  BR38, a New Ultrasound Blood Pool Agent , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[47]  K. Martin Diagnostic Ultrasound: Properties, limitations and artefacts of B-mode images , 2010 .

[48]  M. Tang,et al.  The assessment of microvascular flow and tissue perfusion using ultrasound imaging , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[49]  M. C. Chammas,et al.  Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Liver – Update 2020 – WFUMB in Cooperation with EFSUMB, AFSUMB, AIUM, and FLAUS , 2020, Ultraschall in der Medizin - European Journal of Ultrasound.

[50]  D. Kaplan,et al.  On the statistical characteristics of log‐compressed Rayleigh signals: Theoretical formulation and experimental results , 1994 .

[51]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  The ImageJ ecosystem: An open platform for biomedical image analysis , 2015, Molecular reproduction and development.

[52]  L. Solbiati,et al.  Indeterminate Focal Liver Lesions Incidentally Discovered at Gray-Scale US: Role of Contrast-Enhanced Sonography , 2011, Investigative radiology.

[53]  Fabian Kiessling,et al.  Motion model ultrasound localization microscopy for preclinical and clinical multiparametric tumor characterization , 2018, Nature Communications.

[54]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Ultrasound Localization Microscopy and Super-Resolution: A State of the Art , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[55]  J. Jensen,et al.  Robust microbubble tracking for super resolution imaging in ultrasound , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).

[56]  P. Veit-Haibach,et al.  Assessment of Prostate Cancer With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography Using an En Bloc Approach , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[57]  D. Reeve Diagnostic Ultrasound: Physics and Equipment , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[58]  D T Mason,et al.  Measurement of Instantaneous Blood Flow Velocity and Pressure in Conscious Man with a Catheter‐Tip Velocity Probe , 1969, Circulation.

[59]  Mohammad Eghtedari,et al.  2-Tier In-Plane Motion Correction and Out-of-Plane Motion Filtering for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[60]  Lei Yang,et al.  Automated single particle detection and tracking for large microscopy datasets , 2016, Royal Society Open Science.

[61]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: onset, progression and imaging , 2012, BJU international.

[62]  M. Brawer,et al.  Quantitative microvessel density: A staging and prognostic marker for human prostatic carcinoma , 1996, Cancer.

[63]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Ultrasound localization microscopy to image and assess microvasculature in a rat kidney , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[64]  Qifa Zhou,et al.  Integrated optical coherence tomography, ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging for ovarian tissue characterization , 2011, Biomedical optics express.

[65]  A. Tannenbaum,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[66]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  Sono-activated ultrasound localization microscopy , 2013 .

[67]  Robert J. Eckersley,et al.  In Vivo Acoustic Super-Resolution and Super-Resolved Velocity Mapping Using Microbubbles , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[68]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2003, European urology.

[69]  Elizabeth B. Herbst,et al.  Ultra–Low-Dose Ultrasound Molecular Imaging for the Detection of Angiogenesis in a Mouse Murine Tumor Model: How Little Can We See? , 2016, Investigative radiology.

[70]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Dispersion Imaging for Localization of Angiogenesis and Cancer Growth , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[71]  William J. Godinez,et al.  Objective comparison of particle tracking methods , 2014, Nature Methods.

[72]  Frédéric Wintzenrieth,et al.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound by real-time spatiotemporal filtering of ultrafast images , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[73]  Raffi Karshafian,et al.  Quantifying Vascular Heterogeneity Using Microbubble Disruption-Replenishment Kinetics in Patients With Renal Cell Cancer , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[74]  F. Reinholt,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Identifies Reduced Overall and Regional Renal Perfusion During Global Hypoxia in Piglets , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[75]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Response of contrast agents to ultrasound. , 2008, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[76]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  SUSHI: Sparsity-Based Ultrasound Super-Resolution Hemodynamic Imaging , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[77]  M. Tanter,et al.  Ultrafast ultrasound localization microscopy for deep super-resolution vascular imaging , 2015, Nature.

[78]  Masahito Yamanaka,et al.  Introduction to super-resolution microscopy. , 2014, Microscopy.

[79]  Avi Eisenthal,et al.  A novel assessment of the quality of immunohistostaining overcomes the limitations of current methods. , 2008, Pathology, research and practice.

[80]  Charles Tremblay-Darveau,et al.  Sparsity-based Ultrasound Super-resolution Hemodynamic Imaging , 2017 .

[81]  Vassilis Sboros,et al.  Absolute measurement of ultrasonic backscatter from single microbubbles. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[82]  E. Sijbrands,et al.  Current status and future developments of contrast-enhanced ultrasound of carotid atherosclerosis. , 2013, Journal of vascular surgery.

[83]  Meaghan A. O'Reilly,et al.  A super-resolution ultrasound method for brain vascular mapping. , 2013, Medical physics.

[84]  H. Madarame,et al.  Velocity measurement of both red blood cells and plasma of in vitro blood flow using high-speed micro PIV technique , 2005 .

[85]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Update on the safety and efficacy of commercial ultrasound contrast agents in cardiac applications , 2015, Echo research and practice.