How advanced are Italian regions in terms of public e-services? The construction of a composite indicator to analyze patterns of innovation diffusion in the public sector
暂无分享,去创建一个
Davide Arduini | Antonello Zanfei | Luigi Reggi | D. Arduini | Antonello Zanfei | Marco Biagetti | M. Biagetti | Luigi Reggi
[1] Theresa A. Pardo,et al. Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..
[2] Abraham Charnes,et al. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .
[3] Constance E. Helfat,et al. Dynamic capabilities : understanding strategic change in organizations , 2007 .
[4] D. West. Digital Government: Technology and Public Sector Performance , 2007 .
[5] David R. Cox,et al. Quality‐Of‐Life Assessment: Can We Keep it Simple? , 1992 .
[6] Laurens Cherchye,et al. Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..
[7] Nofal Nagles García. Reseña de "Dynamic capabilities. Understanding strategic change in organizations" de Constance E. Helfat, Sydney Finkelstein, Will Mitchell, Margareth Peteraf, Harbir Singh, David J. Teece, Sidney Winter , 2010 .
[8] Z. Griliches. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .
[9] Gianluca Misuraca,et al. Envisioning digital Europe 2030: scenario design on ICT for governance and policy modelling , 2010, ICEGOV '10.
[10] Jerry Brito,et al. Hack, Mash & Peer: Crowdsourcing Government Transparency , 2007 .
[11] Dawit Demissie,et al. An analysis of African e-Government service websites , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..
[12] B. Noveck. Wiki Government: How Technology Can Make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful , 2009 .
[13] Zlatko J. Kovacic,et al. The Impact of National Culture on Worldwide eGovernment Readiness , 2005, Informing Sci. Int. J. an Emerg. Transdiscipl..
[14] R. R. Russell,et al. Technological Change, Technological Catch-up, and Capital Deepening: Relative Contributions to Growth and Convergence , 2002 .
[15] RESEARCH IN ECONOMETRIC THEORY: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE PRODUCTIVITY RANKINGS , 1999, Econometric Theory.
[16] Jane E. Fountain,et al. Public Sector: Early Stage of a Deep Transformation , 2001 .
[17] H. Gulliksen. Theory of mental tests , 1952 .
[18] J. Fountain. Information, Institutions and Governance: Advancing a Basic Social Science Research Program for Digital Government , 2003 .
[19] R. Huggins. Creating a UK Competitiveness Index: Regional and Local Benchmarking , 2003 .
[20] Anthony M. Cresswell,et al. Designing electronic government information access programs: a holistic approach , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..
[21] Macroeconometrics : Past and future , 2001 .
[22] A. Ho,et al. Explaining the Adoption of E-Government Features , 2004 .
[23] Ryad Titah,et al. E-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..
[24] W. Wong,et al. Does E‐Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability , 2004 .
[25] Laurens Cherchye,et al. An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .
[26] Charles P. Jones,et al. An Analysis of the S&P 500 Index and Cowles's Extensions: Price Indexes and Stock Returns, 1870-1999 , 2002 .
[27] Jeremy Millard. Reorganisation of Government Back-Offices for Better Electronic Public Services , 2004, EGOV.
[28] Willem Moesen,et al. Towards a synthetic indicator of macroeconomic performance: Unequal weighting when limited information is available , 1991 .
[29] D. Arduini,et al. What do we know from the literature on public e-services? , 2011 .
[30] A. Meijer. Understanding modern transparency , 2009 .
[31] Sonia Royo,et al. ARE ICTs IMPROVING TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE EU REGIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS? AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2007 .
[32] France Bélanger,et al. Trust and Risk in eGovernment Adoption , 2008, AMCIS.
[33] Stefano Tarantola,et al. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and User Guide , 2005 .
[34] L. Cherchye,et al. Legitimately Diverse, Yet Comparable: On Synthesizing Social Inclusion Performance in the EU , 2004 .
[35] Dag H. Olsen,et al. Local E-Government in Norway: Current Status and Emerging Issues , 2005, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..
[36] Hyun Joon Kim,et al. The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..
[37] H. Grupp,et al. Indicators for national science and technology policy: how robust are composite indicators? , 2004 .
[38] D. West. E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .
[39] E. Felten,et al. Government Data and the Invisible Hand , 2009 .
[40] Federico Belotti,et al. Technology Adoption and Innovation in Public Services: The Case of E-Government in Italy , 2008, Inf. Econ. Policy.
[41] Harald Baldersheim,et al. Innovation in E-government: Analysis of municipal web pages in the Nordic countries , 2008, Inf. Polity.
[42] A. Saltelli,et al. Expert Panel Opinion and Global Sensitivity Analysis for Composite Indicators , 2008 .
[43] Marc Holzer,et al. Digital Governance Worldwide: A Longitudinal Assessment of Municipal Web Sites , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..
[44] M. Bochicchio,et al. Smarter, Faster, Better e-Government , 2012 .
[45] Paul T. Jaeger,et al. Crowd-sourcing transparency: ICTs, social media, and government transparency initiatives , 2010, DG.O.