Membrane Filtration of Coagulated Suspensions

The deposition of small colloids or macromolecules in membrane pores and the subsequent irreversible fouling of the membrane is considered using a simple model for membrane fouling. As a strategy for avoiding pore fouling, it is proposed that foulants capable of entering membrane pores be aggregated to produce particles that are rejected at the membrane surface. Considerations in filtering suspensions of particles on membranes are discussed with emphasis on particle transport mechanisms as a function of particle size. It is concluded that particles larger than 3 μ\Nm should not contribute significantly to membrane fouling at permeate fluxes that are currently feasible. For many membrane configurations, particles between 0.1 and 1 μ\Nm will be most likely to contribute to fouling on membrane surfaces. Batch flocculation and membrane filtration experiments were conducted to test the feasibility of manipulating flocculation conditions to control particle size and fouling. Conditions that produced particles with a zeta potential near zero minimized fouling by reducing foulant penetration into pores, increasing the porosity of the deposited cake, and increasing the transport of potential foulants away from the membrane.

[1]  John Dodds,et al.  Filtration of low concentrations of latex particles on membrane filters , 1985 .

[2]  R. Summers,et al.  Diffusion of humic acid in dilute aqueous solution , 1986 .

[3]  Charles R. O'Melia,et al.  Particles, Pretreatment, and Performance in Water Filtration , 1985 .

[4]  Ruben D. Cohen,et al.  Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes , 1986 .

[5]  J. L. Anderson,et al.  The streaming potential and inadequacies of the Helmholtz equation , 1985 .

[6]  J. Hermia,et al.  Constant Pressure Blocking Filtration Laws - Application To Power-law Non-newtonian Fluids , 1982 .

[7]  M. Schnitzer,et al.  THE SURFACE TENSION OF AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS OF SOIL HUMIC SUBSTANCES , 1978 .

[8]  B. A. Winfield,et al.  A study of the factors affecting the rate of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes treating secondary sewage effluents , 1979 .

[9]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Ultrafiltration of suspensions , 1984 .

[10]  S. S. Wang,et al.  A critical review of fouling of reverse osmosis membranes , 1981 .

[11]  Anthony G. Fane,et al.  Surface charge and permeability in the ultrafiltration of non-flocculating colloids , 1984 .

[12]  J. Howell,et al.  Alternative model for ultrafiltration , 1984 .

[13]  J. Buffle,et al.  Voltammetric study of humic and fulvic substances: Part IV. Behaviour of fulvic substances at the mercury-water interface , 1981 .

[14]  Georges Belfort,et al.  Pretreatment and cleaning of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis) membranes in municipal wastewater renovation , 1977 .

[15]  C. Langford,et al.  Light scattering studies of the relationship between cation binding and aggregation of a fulvic acid , 1985 .

[16]  Robert H. Davis,et al.  Shear-induced transport of a particle layer along a porous wall , 1987 .

[17]  E. Matthiasson The role of macromolecular adsorption in fouling of ultrafiltration membranes , 1983 .

[18]  G. Green,et al.  Fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: lateral migration and the particle trajectory model , 1980 .

[19]  G. G. Leppard,et al.  A description of the aggregation properties of aquatic pedogenic fulvic acids: Combining physico-chemical data and microscopical observations , 1986 .