Decision-Making and Cognition Modeling from the Theory of Mental Instruments

The authors present the theory of quantum measurements in a humanities friendly way. The most general process of decision-making is represented with the aid of the formalism of quantum apparatuses and instruments. This measurement formalism generalizes the standard one based on the von Neumann–Luders projection postulate. Generalized quantum observables are mathematically represented as positive operator valued measures (POVMs) and state transformers resulting from the feedback of measurements to the states of systems that are given by quantum instruments. The quantum scheme of indirect measurements (a special realization of quantum instruments) is applied to model decision-making as resulting from the interaction between the belief and decision states. The authors analyze the specific features of quantum instruments which are important for cognitive and social applications. In particular, the state transformers given by quantum instruments are in general less invasive than the state projections. Thus quantum-like decision-making need not be viewed as a kind of state collapse.

[1]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like model of diauxie in Escherichia coli: operational description of precultivation effect. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Dynamics of Entropy in Quantum-like Model of Decision Making. , 2011 .

[3]  N. David Mermin,et al.  Boojums All The Way Through , 1990 .

[4]  A. Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum Social Science , 2013 .

[5]  E. Sudarshan,et al.  Who's afraid of not completely positive maps? , 2005 .

[6]  Anton Zeilinger,et al.  Dance of the Photons: From Einstein to Quantum Teleportation , 2010 .

[7]  P. Dirac Principles of Quantum Mechanics , 1982 .

[8]  J. Neumann Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1955 .

[9]  M. Ozawa Quantum measuring processes of continuous observables , 1984 .

[10]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Epistemology and Probability: Bohr, Heisenberg, Schrödinger, and the Nature of Quantum-Theoretical Thinking , 2009 .

[11]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Quantum model for psychological measurements: from the projection postulate to interference of mental observables represented as positive operator valued measures , 2014, 1405.1269.

[12]  Arkady Plotnitsky,et al.  Reading Bohr: Physics and Philosophy , 2006 .

[13]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure: From Psychology to Finance , 2010 .

[14]  Marian Grabowski,et al.  Operational Quantum Physics , 2001 .

[15]  I. Chuang,et al.  Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: Bibliography , 2010 .

[16]  Jerome R Busemeyer,et al.  Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[17]  Giacomo Mauro D'Ariano,et al.  Operational Axioms for Quantum Mechanics , 2006, quant-ph/0611094.

[18]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Quantum Models for Psychological Measurements: An Unsolved Problem , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  Yoshiharu Tanaka,et al.  Quantum-like model of brain's functioning: decision making from decoherence. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[20]  Leslie E Ballentine,et al.  Limitations of the projection postulate , 1990 .

[21]  Jerome R. Busemeyer,et al.  Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision , 2012 .

[22]  Andrei Khrennikov,et al.  Ubiquitous Quantum Structure , 2010 .

[23]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  On Application of Gorini-Kossakowski-Sudarshan-Lindblad Equation in Cognitive Psychology , 2011, Open Syst. Inf. Dyn..

[24]  Masanao Ozawa An Operational Approach to Quantum State Reduction , 1997 .

[25]  John T. Lewis,et al.  An operational approach to quantum probability , 1970 .

[26]  W. B. Pillsbury,et al.  Psychology, A Study of Mental Life. , 1922 .

[27]  Masanori Ohya,et al.  Quantum-Like Model for Decision Making Process in Two Players Game , 2011 .