Electronic Waste Recycling Preferences in California: The Role of Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors

The growing stockpiles of electronic waste (e-waste) pose a threat to human and environmental health if improperly disposed because of the hazardous materials in e-waste. The number of recycling programs across the U.S. is increasing, yet little is known about household e-waste recycling preferences. Our survey of California households indicates that most prefer curbside recycling, but drop-off recycling at regional collection centers also has widespread support. Most importantly, we find that it is important to include information on environmental attitudes and behaviors when estimating willingness to pay (WTP) for e- waste recycling; neglecting environmental attitudes can result in a biased WTP. Other key predictors of WTP include age, gender, ethnicity, and attitudes toward the role of business in protecting the environment.

[1]  Athanasios Krystallis,et al.  Consumers' willingness to pay for organic food: Factors that affect it and variation per organic product type , 2005 .

[2]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[3]  Guy Garrod,et al.  Using Contingent Ranking to Estimate the Loss of Amenity Value for Inland Waterways from Public Utility Service Structures , 1998 .

[4]  Jacob Hornik,et al.  Determinants of recycling behavior: A synthesis of research results , 1995 .

[5]  Thomas J. Lareau,et al.  Valuing WTP for diesel odor reductions: An application of contingent ranking technique , 1989 .

[6]  V. Foster,et al.  Valuing the Multiple Impacts of Pesticide Use in the UK: A Contingent Ranking Approach , 2008 .

[7]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Testing for Consistency in Contingent Ranking Experiments , 2002 .

[8]  Oladele A. Ogunseitan,et al.  California households' willingness to pay for ‘green’ electronics , 2007 .

[9]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Who recycles and when? A review of personal and situational factors , 1995 .

[10]  Arthur J. Caplan,et al.  Waste Not or Want Not? A Contingent Ranking Analysis of Curbside Waste Disposal Options , 2002 .

[11]  Stuart Oskamp,et al.  Resource Conservation and Recycling: Behavior and Policy , 1995 .

[12]  James D. Reschovsky,et al.  Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: Paying for what you throw away , 1994 .

[13]  M. Laroche,et al.  Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products , 2001 .

[14]  H. K. Cordell,et al.  Ethnic Variation in Environmental Belief and Behavior , 2004 .

[15]  Hilary Nixon,et al.  Financing electronic waste recycling Californian households' willingness to pay advanced recycling fees. , 2007, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  Kristen Lyons,et al.  Choosing organics: a path analysis of factors underlying the selection of organic food among Australian consumers , 2004, Appetite.

[17]  Peter Junker,et al.  The contingent ranking method--a feasible and valid method when eliciting preferences for health care? , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[18]  T.G. Townsend,et al.  Assessing the Landfill Disposal Implication of Discarded Electronic Equipment , 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, 2006..

[19]  Maria L. Loureiro,et al.  Preferences and willingness to pay for GM labeling policies , 2004 .

[20]  Kelly H. Tiller,et al.  Generation of Recyclables by Rural Households , 1996 .

[21]  E. Howenstine,et al.  Market Segmentation for Recycling , 1993 .

[22]  V. Foster,et al.  Evaluating health and environmental impacts of pesticide use: implications for the design of ecolabels and pesticide taxes. , 2000 .

[23]  Robin R. Jenkins,et al.  The Determinants of Household Recycling: A Material Specific Analysis of Recycling Program Features and Unit Pricing , 2003 .

[24]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Household Willingness to Recycle Electronic Waste , 2006 .

[25]  I. Bateman,et al.  Comparing contingent valuation and contingent ranking: a case study considering the benefits of urban river water quality improvements. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Kelly H. Tiller,et al.  Explaining Rural Household Participation in Recycling , 1997, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics.

[27]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Assessing the potential demand for electric cars , 1981 .

[28]  Susana Mourato,et al.  Evaluating the multiple benefits of marine water quality improvements: how important are health risk reductions? , 2002, Journal of environmental management.

[29]  Guy Garrod,et al.  The non-use benefits of enhancing forest biodiversity: A contingent ranking study , 1997 .

[30]  T. Sterner,et al.  Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting , 1999 .