Stimulus artifact removal using a software-based two-stage peak detection algorithm

The analysis of stimulus evoked neuromuscular potentials or m-waves is a useful technique for improved feedback control in functional electrical stimulation systems. Usually, however, these signals are contaminated by stimulus artifact. A novel software technique, which uses a two-stage peak detection algorithm, has been developed to remove the unwanted artifact from the recorded signal. The advantage of the technique is that it can be used on all stimulation artifact-contaminated electroneurophysiologic data provided that the artifact and the biopotential are non-overlapping. The technique does not require any estimation of the stimulus artifact shape or duration. With the developed technique, it is not necessary to record a pure artifact signal for template estimation, a process that can increase the complexity of experimentation. The technique also does not require the recording of any external hardware synchronisation pulses. The method avoids the use of analogue or digital filtering techniques, which endeavour to remove certain high frequency components of the artifact signal, but invariably have difficulty, resulting in the removal of frequencies in the same spectrum as the m-wave. With the new technique the signal is sampled at a high frequency to ensure optimum fidelity. Instrumentation saturation effects due to the artifact can be avoided with careful electrode placement. The technique was fully tested with a wide variety of electrical stimulation parameters (frequency and pulse width) applied to the common peroneal nerve to elicit contraction in the tibialis anterior. The program was also developed to allow batch processing of multiple files, using closed loop feedback correction. The two-stage peak detection artifact removal algorithm is demonstrated as an efficient post-processing technique for acquiring artifact free m-waves.

[1]  G W Harding,et al.  A method for eliminating the stimulus artifact from digital recordings of the direct cortical response. , 1991, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[2]  Thomas Wichmann,et al.  A digital averaging method for removal of stimulus artifacts in neurophysiologic experiments , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  T L Babb,et al.  A sample and hold amplifier system for stimulus artifact suppression. , 1978, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  R J Roby,et al.  Proceedings: A simplified circuit for stimulus artifact suppression. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  J. A. Freeman An electronic stimulus artifact suppressor. , 1971, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  B. Widrow,et al.  On the Nature and Elimination of Stimulus Artifact in Nerve Signals Evoked and Recorded Using Surface Electrodes , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  Patrick E. Crago,et al.  Stimulus artifact removal in EMG from muscles adjacent to stimulated muscles , 1996, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[8]  Carlo J. De Luca,et al.  The Use of Surface Electromyography in Biomechanics , 1997 .

[9]  Francisco Del Pozo,et al.  Hybrid stimulator for chronic experiments , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  Peter Shizgal,et al.  Improved artifact rejection and isolation of compound action potentials by means of digital subtraction , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[11]  R. M. Hashemi,et al.  Using evoked EMG as a synthetic force sensor of isometric electrically stimulated muscle , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  R. Merletti,et al.  Suppression of stimulation artifacts from myoelectric-evoked potential recordings , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  T Blogg,et al.  A digital technique for stimulus artifact reduction. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[14]  H J Spencer An automatic, optically isolated, biphasic constant current stimulator adapter for artefact suppression. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[15]  R. Merletti,et al.  Electrically evoked myoelectric signals. , 1992, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[16]  R. D'ambrosia,et al.  A technique for recording the EMG of electrically stimulated skeletal muscle. , 1985, Orthopedics.