The enduring challenge of ‘wicked problems’: revisiting Rittel and Webber

[1]  Måns Nilsson,et al.  The Role of Assessments and Institutions for Policy Learning: A Study on Swedish Climate and Nuclear Policy Formation , 2006 .

[2]  Aaron Wildavsky,et al.  If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing , 1973 .

[3]  Hugh Dubberly,et al.  Why Horst W. J. Rittel Matters , 2007, Design Issues.

[4]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[5]  C. Churchman.  The systems approach and its enemies , 1979 .

[6]  M. Webber.  The Myth of Rationality: Development Planning Reconsidered , 1983 .

[7]  B. Head.  Problem Definition and the Policy Process: Wicked Problems , 2017 .

[8]  D. Aubin,et al.  Functional regulatory spaces , 2013 .

[9]  B. Head,et al.  Wicked Problems , 2015 .

[10]  E. Alexander,et al.  Doing the ‘Impossible’: Notes for a General Theory of Planning , 1998 .

[11]  M. McBeth,et al.  Buffalo tales: interest group policy stories in Greater Yellowstone , 2010 .

[12]  M. McBeth,et al.  Public opinion for sale: The role of policy marketers in Greater Yellowstone policy conflict , 2004 .

[13]  C. West Churchman,et al.  The Systems Approach , 1979 .

[14]  J. Dryzek.  The Politics of the Earth , 2021 .

[15]  M. Hajer.  Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[16]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Collaborative rationality as a strategy for working with wicked problems , 2016 .

[17]  D. Ludwig.  The Era of Management Is Over , 2001, Ecosystems.

[18]  K. Crowley,et al.  Policy Analysis in Australia , 2015 .

[19]  A. Bahm.  Comments: Planners' failures generate a scapegoat , 1975 .

[20]  Anand Desai,et al.  Wicked Environmental Problems , 2011 .

[21]  Erik-Hans Klijn,et al.  Dealing with Wicked Problems in Networks: Analyzing an Environmental Debate from a Network Perspective , 2003 .

[22]  J. Parkhurst.  Appeals to evidence for the resolution of wicked problems: the origins and mechanisms of evidentiary bias , 2016 .

[23]  M. Nie.  Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict , 2003 .

[24]  M. Kerkhof,et al.  Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues , 2006 .

[25]  B. Head,et al.  Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: More awareness, greater acceptance, and better adaptation , 2016 .

[26]  Pirkko Vartiainen,et al.  Accelerating the public’s learning curve on wicked policy issues: results from deliberative forums on euthanasia , 2015 .

[27]  M. McBeth,et al.  Conduit or contributor? The role of media in policy change theory , 2008 .

[28]  W. Xiang.  Working with wicked problems in socio-ecological systems: Awareness, acceptance, and adaptation , 2013 .

[29]  B. Nykvist,et al.  The use and non-use of policy appraisal tools in public policy making: an analysis of three European countries and the European Union , 2008 .

[30]  Eefje Cuppen,et al.  Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods , 2012 .

[31]  J. S. Legge,et al.  “Wicked Problems,” Public Policy, and Administrative Theory , 2006 .

[32]  Kelly Levin,et al.  Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change , 2012 .

[33]  Nancy C. Roberts,et al.  Wicked Problems and Network Approaches to Resolution , 2000 .

[34]  Frank Fischer,et al.  Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases , 1993 .

[35]  Péter Bálint.  Wicked environmental problems : managing uncertainty and conflict , 2011 .

[36]  Andrejs Skaburskis,et al.  The Origin of “Wicked Problems” , 2008 .