Progress made in the reprogramming field: new factors, new strategies and a new outlook.

The ground-breaking work of Yamanaka and Thomson showed that forced expression of just four transcription factors can reprogram mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency, leading to the discovery of the so-called induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). Similar to embryonic stem cells (ESCs), iPSCs have the ability to permanently self-renew and also give rise to multiple cell types once differentiated. These cells opened up the opportunity to develop human disease models in vitro, drug and toxicity screening tools, as well as a continuous autologous cell source for future cell-based therapies. Therefore, it is not surprising that the methods for generating iPSCs have significantly evolved over the past few years. To date the reprogramming methods include the use of various transfection/transduction systems, small molecules to enhance the reprogramming process, and to adapt to a multitude of different cell type sources. We are now able to convert essentially any somatic cell type into iPSCs with increased efficiency and at higher quality when compared to ESCs. More recently, this field has been expanded to direct reprogramming of one cell type to another, including lineage-specific progenitors. Here, we provide a concise review of methods to generate induced pluripotent stem cells, and discuss the most recent strategies augmenting the reprogramming process and increasing the quality of iPSCs.

[1]  M. Blasco,et al.  The Ink4/Arf locus is a barrier for iPS cell reprogramming , 2009, Nature.

[2]  H. Redl,et al.  Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[3]  M. Nöthen,et al.  Direct conversion of fibroblasts into stably expandable neural stem cells. , 2012, Cell stem cell.

[4]  K. Alitalo,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Clones Reprogrammed via Recombinant Adeno-Associated Virus-Mediated Transduction Contain Integrated Vector Sequences , 2012, Journal of Virology.

[5]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[6]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Single-gene transgenic mouse strains for reprogramming adult somatic cells , 2010, Nature Methods.

[7]  P. Park,et al.  Ascorbic acid prevents loss of Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting and facilitates generation of all-iPS cell mice from terminally differentiated B cells , 2012, Nature Genetics.

[8]  Yoshifumi Kawamura,et al.  Direct reprogramming of somatic cells is promoted by maternal transcription factor Glis1 , 2011, Nature.

[9]  Gang Wang,et al.  Conversion of mouse fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes using a direct reprogramming strategy , 2011, Nature Cell Biology.

[10]  Y. Bergman,et al.  A dynamic balance between ARP-1/COUP-TFII, EAR-3/COUP-TFI, and retinoic acid receptor:retinoid X receptor heterodimers regulates Oct-3/4 expression in embryonal carcinoma cells , 1995, Molecular and cellular biology.

[11]  Tomohiro Kono,et al.  Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[12]  Stéphanie Boué,et al.  Methods for making induced pluripotent stem cells: reprogramming à la carte , 2011, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  Manuel Serrano,et al.  A p53-mediated DNA damage response limits reprogramming to ensure iPS cell genomic integrity , 2009, Nature.

[14]  Rudolf Jaenisch,et al.  Ectopic Expression of Oct-4 Blocks Progenitor-Cell Differentiation and Causes Dysplasia in Epithelial Tissues , 2005, Cell.

[15]  Hsu-hsin Chen,et al.  A murine ESC-like state facilitates transgenesis and homologous recombination in human pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[16]  Richard A Young,et al.  Wnt signaling promotes reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[17]  Yuriy L. Orlov,et al.  Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature.

[18]  H. Nakauchi,et al.  Development of Defective and Persistent Sendai Virus Vector , 2010, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[19]  Yasuko Matsumura,et al.  A more efficient method to generate integration-free human iPS cells , 2011, Nature Methods.

[20]  G. Pan,et al.  The histone demethylases Jhdm1a/1b enhance somatic cell reprogramming in a vitamin-C-dependent manner. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[21]  J. Rinn,et al.  Large intergenic non-coding RNA-RoR modulates reprogramming of human induced pluripotent stem cells , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[22]  W. Birchmeier,et al.  E‐cadherin is crucial for embryonic stem cell pluripotency and can replace OCT4 during somatic cell reprogramming , 2011, EMBO reports.

[23]  F. Alt,et al.  Excision of Reprogramming Transgenes Improves the Differentiation Potential of iPS Cells Generated with a Single Excisable Vector , 2009, Stem cells.

[24]  R. Stewart,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[25]  Marius Wernig,et al.  c-Myc is dispensable for direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[26]  Hidenori Akutsu,et al.  A small-molecule inhibitor of tgf-Beta signaling replaces sox2 in reprogramming by inducing nanog. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[27]  Michel Sadelain,et al.  Stoichiometric and temporal requirements of Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc expression for efficient human iPSC induction and differentiation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  A. Schnerch,et al.  Direct conversion of human fibroblasts to multilineage blood progenitors , 2010, Nature.

[29]  S. Lipton,et al.  Direct reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts to neural progenitors , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  H. Okano,et al.  Neural Stem Cells Directly Differentiated from Partially Reprogrammed Fibroblasts Rapidly Acquire Gliogenic Competency , 2012, Stem cells.

[31]  H. Schöler,et al.  Reprogramming fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with Bmi1 , 2011, Cell Research.

[32]  J. Rinn,et al.  lincRNAs act in the circuitry controlling pluripotency and differentiation , 2011, Nature.

[33]  Yuriy L Orlov,et al.  The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[34]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Reprogramming of human peripheral blood cells to induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[35]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Adult Human Fibroblasts by Defined Factors , 2007, Cell.

[36]  Roland Rad,et al.  Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor gamma and liver receptor homolog 1 , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Mudit Gupta,et al.  Highly efficient miRNA-mediated reprogramming of mouse and human somatic cells to pluripotency. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[38]  Takashi Aoi,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells without Myc from mouse and human fibroblasts , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[39]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  Reprogramming of murine and human somatic cells using a single polycistronic vector , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Wenjun Guo,et al.  Induction of pluripotent stem cells from primary human fibroblasts with only Oct4 and Sox2 , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  Maikun Teng,et al.  MicroRNA Cluster 302–367 Enhances Somatic Cell Reprogramming by Accelerating a Mesenchymal-to-Epithelial Transition* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  Jing Chen,et al.  BMPs functionally replace Klf4 and support efficient reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts by Oct4 alone , 2011, Cell Research.

[43]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Role of the Murine Reprogramming Factors in the Induction of Pluripotency , 2009, Cell.

[44]  J. I. Izpisúa Belmonte,et al.  Reprogramming with defined factors: from induced pluripotency to induced transdifferentiation. , 2010, Molecular human reproduction.

[45]  Jialiang Liang,et al.  A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[46]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  Promotion of direct reprogramming by transformation-deficient Myc , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[47]  J. Wrana,et al.  Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[48]  Wei Wang,et al.  piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[49]  Tao Wang,et al.  Esrrb Activates Oct4 Transcription and Sustains Self-renewal and Pluripotency in Embryonic Stem Cells* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[50]  Mitsugu Sekimoto,et al.  Reprogramming of mouse and human cells to pluripotency using mature microRNAs. , 2011, Cell stem cell.

[51]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[52]  Xiaolei Yin,et al.  Two supporting factors greatly improve the efficiency of human iPSC generation. , 2008, Cell stem cell.

[53]  H. Tse,et al.  Generation of induced pluripotent stem cells from urine. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[54]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Connecting microRNA Genes to the Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[55]  Wanguo Wei,et al.  Chemical strategies for stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. , 2011, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[56]  Junying Yu,et al.  Efficient Feeder-Free Episomal Reprogramming with Small Molecules , 2011, PloS one.

[57]  M. Hasegawa,et al.  Efficient induction of transgene-free human pluripotent stem cells using a vector based on Sendai virus, an RNA virus that does not integrate into the host genome , 2009, Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences.

[58]  C. Lengner,et al.  Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[59]  Wenbo Zhou,et al.  Adenoviral Gene Delivery Can Reprogram Human Fibroblasts to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2009, Stem cells.

[60]  Thomas Lufkin,et al.  Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[61]  Robert L. Judson,et al.  Multiple targets of miR-302 and miR-372 promote reprogramming of human fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.