Virtual reality Stroop task for assessment of supervisory attentional processing

The current project is a preliminary attempt at assessing the potential of a three-dimensional virtual reality Stroop task (VRST) for investigation of supervisory attentional processing. The VRST was compared with paper-and-pencil and computer automated (two-dimensional) versions of the Stroop. Psychophysiological measures were also used to assess varying levels of user arousal. The three versions of the Stroop task were conducted with a sample of 50 healthy university students, between the ages of 18 and 28 years, which included equivalent distributions of men and women from ethnically diverse populations. No significant differences were found for age, gender, or education. Results indicated that the typical Stroop effect pattern found in the Delis–Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) and Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) occurs in the VRST; the complexity condition of the VRST offers potential for assessment of exogenous and endogenous attentional processing; the two single-item presentation formats of the Stroop are comparable; there is a psychophysiological difference in arousal between low- and high-threat zones; and while there is a learning effect present in the VRST across conditions, it is limited by the arousal conditions in the high-threat zones. Additionally, no negative side effects were associated with use of the virtual environment. We conclude that the VRST has the potential to offer a novel approach to assessment of supervisory attentional processing within an ecologically relevant environment.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[2]  H. Mayberg,et al.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  P. Tibbetts :Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind , 2009 .

[4]  S. Orr,et al.  Electrodermal psychophysiology of anxiety disorder: Orienting response and spontaneous fluctuations , 1987, Biological Psychiatry.

[5]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Training and Stroop-like interference: evidence for a continuum of automaticity. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Philip Schatz,et al.  Applications of Computer-based Neuropsychological Assessment , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[7]  P. Tremblay,et al.  Practice Effect and Test-Retest Reliability of Attentional and Executive Tests in Middle-Aged to Elderly Subjects , 2004, The Clinical neuropsychologist.

[8]  H. Critchley Neural mechanisms of autonomic, affective, and cognitive integration , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  Y. Yamamoto,et al.  Effects of Stroop color-word conflict test on the autonomic nervous system responses. , 1997, The American journal of physiology.

[10]  J. Barth,et al.  Concussion Resolution Index , 2013 .

[11]  R. Schlegel,et al.  Reliability and construct validity of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) mood scale. , 2008, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[12]  D. Rom A sequentially rejective test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni inequality , 1990 .

[13]  J. Ridley Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[14]  Thomas D. Parsons,et al.  Adaptive virtual environments for neuropsychological assessment in serious games , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[15]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[16]  A. Craig How do you feel? Interoception: the sense of the physiological condition of the body , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[18]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[19]  C. Wientjes Respiration in psychophysiology: methods and applications , 1992, Biological Psychology.

[20]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Stroop Interference, Practice, and Aging , 2003, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  A. D. Fisk,et al.  Control and Automatic Processing During Tasks Requiring Sustained Attention: A New Approach to Vigilance , 1981 .

[24]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[25]  Thomas D. Parsons,et al.  Virtual Reality Stroop Task for Neurocognitive Assessment , 2011, MMVR.

[26]  Dongrui Wu,et al.  Collaborative Filtering for Brain-Computer Interaction Using Transfer Learning and Active Class Selection , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: I , 1977 .

[28]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  The stroop task : the «Gold Standard» of attentional measures , 1992 .

[29]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[30]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[31]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  W. Gehring,et al.  More attention must be paid: The neurobiology of attentional effort , 2006, Brain Research Reviews.

[33]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[34]  M. D’Esposito Working memory. , 2008, Handbook of clinical neurology.

[35]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[36]  Christopher G. Courtney,et al.  Better than the real thing: eliciting fear with moving and static computer-generated stimuli. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[37]  A. Baddeley Exploring the Central Executive , 1996 .

[38]  P. Graf,et al.  Color-Word Stroop test performance across the adult life span. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[39]  M. Schmitter-Edgecombe,et al.  The Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Tests: A Review of the Literature on Everyday Cognitive Skills , 2003, Neuropsychology Review.

[40]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[41]  S. Joordens,et al.  Conducting research with non-clinical healthy undergraduates: does effort play a role in neuropsychological test performance? , 2012, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[42]  Robert L Kane,et al.  ANAM genogram: historical perspectives, description, and current endeavors. , 2007, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[43]  W. Rogers,et al.  Mechanisms underlying reduction in Stroop interference with practice for young and old adults. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  R S Kennedy,et al.  Use of a motion sickness history questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[45]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Brent Lance,et al.  Optimal Arousal Identification and Classification for Affective Computing Using Physiological Signals: Virtual Reality Stroop Task , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[47]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and Automatic Human Information Processing: 1. Detection, Search, and Attention. , 1977 .