Control of Out-of-Focus Light Intensity in Confocal Raman Microscopy Using Optical Preprocessing

Optical preprocessing, the manipulation of imaging-forming light prior to detection, is used in many forms of microscopy to enhance image information and interpretation. The rejection of out-of-focus light by a pinhole in confocal microscopy is an example of optical preprocessing, where spatial filtering is carried out in a plane conjugate to the object focal plane. The rejection efficiency afforded by this arrangement is, however, sometimes insufficient. Insufficient rejection of out-of-focus light intensity can lead to incorrect interpretations of confocal Raman depth and line maps. An alternative approach is to reject out-of-focus light by implementing spatial filtering in one of the several planes conjugate to the pupil plane. This paper shows that mapping enhanced by structured pupils (MESP) provides substantial additional rejection of out-of-focus intensity relative to traditional confocal microscopy, yielding a potential solution to the problem of misleading Raman maps. In addition, lossless MESP is proposed, wherein simple phase masks simultaneously direct in-focus and out-of-focus light intensity transmitted by confocal optics to different regions of a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector.

[1]  W. Webb,et al.  Dynamics of fluorescence marker concentration as a probe of mobility. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[2]  Myung K. Kim,et al.  Single-exposure optical sectioning by color structured illumination microscopy. , 2006, Optics letters.

[3]  M. Gustafsson Nonlinear structured-illumination microscopy: wide-field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  T. Wilson,et al.  Adaptive optics for structured illumination microscopy. , 2008, Optics express.

[5]  M. Houlne,et al.  Spatially resolved analysis of small particles by confocal Raman microscopy: depth profiling and optical trapping. , 2004, Analytical chemistry.

[6]  T Wilson,et al.  Size of the detector in confocal imaging systems. , 1987, Optics letters.

[7]  T. Wilson,et al.  Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope. , 1997, Optics letters.

[8]  N. Everall The Influence of Out-of-Focus Sample Regions on the Surface Specificity of Confocal Raman Microscopy , 2008, Applied spectroscopy.

[9]  T. Wilson,et al.  The Use of Annular Pupil Plane Filters to Tune the Imaging Properties in Confocal Microscopy , 1990 .

[10]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  S: Widefield Light Microscopy with 100-nm-scale Resolution in Three Dimensions , 2007 .

[11]  M Gu,et al.  Effect of an annular pupil on confocal imaging through highly scattering media. , 1996, Optics letters.

[12]  David Baddeley,et al.  Nanostructure analysis using spatially modulated illumination microscopy , 2003, Nature Protocols.

[13]  Ke Si,et al.  The divided aperture technique for microscopy through scattering media. , 2008, Optics express.

[14]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[15]  David Baddeley,et al.  High-precision structural analysis of subnuclear complexes in fixed and live cells via spatially modulated illumination (SMI) microscopy , 2008, Chromosome Research.

[16]  P. Carlton,et al.  Three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy and its application to chromosome structure , 2008, Chromosome Research.

[17]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Subdiffraction Multicolor Imaging of the Nuclear Periphery with 3D Structured Illumination Microscopy , 2008, Science.