Anomaly user effect on detection performance of eigenvalue and volume based spectrum sensing

In wireless communication networks, the physical layer security is of prime concern which is mainly effected due to anomaly/malicious users. Cognitive radio network (CRN) is one of the next generation wireless networks, recently emerged as a technology that can use unoccupied licensed frequency bands temporarily without taking permission from spectrum regulatory bodies. Owing to inherent nature of unlicensed access, CRNs are more likely to anomaly user effects that degrades the Quality of service (QoS) of both licensed and cognitive user communications. These effects are generally taken place during spectrum sensing. To eliminate single anomaly effects and improve accuracy of sensing decision by applying spatial diversity concept, cooperative sensing techniques have been developed. However, the detection probability of cooperative sensing degrades owing to the presence of multiple anomaly user in the network. In particular, due to spectrum sensing data falsification (SSDF) attacks. Hence, in this work, three types of basic SSDF anomaly in CRNs are investigated and presented their impact on detection probability by selecting two prominent signal detection methods namely Volume detection (VD) and Max-Min eigenvalue detection (MME). Simulation results reveal that there is a significant performance degradation due to these anomaly that has to be addressed to improve the detection performance.

[1]  Martin Reisslein,et al.  Cognitive Radio for Smart Grids: Survey of Architectures, Spectrum Sensing Mechanisms, and Networking Protocols , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[2]  Mohamed Gharbi,et al.  Blind Spectrum Sensing Using Extreme Eigenvalues for Cognitive Radio Networks , 2018, IEEE Communications Letters.

[3]  Samrat L. Sabat,et al.  Cooperative wideband spectrum sensing in suspicious cognitive radio network , 2013, IET Wirel. Sens. Syst..

[4]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Collaborative Spectrum Sensing in the Presence of Byzantine Attacks in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  Bin-Jie Hu,et al.  Analysis of Sensing Efficiency for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing With Malicious Users in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2014, IEEE Communications Letters.

[6]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  An Overview of Physical Layer Security in Wireless Communication Systems With CSIT Uncertainty , 2016, IEEE Access.

[7]  Peng Ning,et al.  HMM-Based Malicious User Detection for Robust Collaborative Spectrum Sensing , 2013, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Majid Khabbazian,et al.  Malicious User Detection in a Cognitive Radio Cooperative Sensing System , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[9]  Mthulisi Velempini,et al.  Investigating Spectrum Sensing Security Threats in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2017, ADHOCNETS.

[10]  Lei Huang,et al.  Performance Analysis of Volume-Based Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Amit Kumar Mishra,et al.  Efficient elimination of erroneous nodes in cooperative sensing for cognitive radio networks , 2016, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[12]  Yonghong Zeng,et al.  Eigenvalue-based spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Liuqing Yang,et al.  Securing physical-layer communications for cognitive radio networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[14]  Adrish Banerjee,et al.  Block Outlier Methods for Malicious User Detection in Cooperative Spectrum Sensing , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).