Passive stability and active control in a rhythmic task.

Rhythmically bouncing a ball with a racket is a task that affords passively stable solutions as demonstrated by stability analyses of a mathematical model of the task. Passive stability implies that no active control is needed as errors die out without requiring corrective actions. Empirical results from human performance demonstrated that actors indeed exploit this passive dynamics in steady-state performance, thereby reducing computational demands of the task. The present study investigated the response to perturbations of different magnitudes designed on the basis of the model's basin of attraction. Humans performed the task in a virtual reality set-up with a haptic interface. Relaxation times of the performance errors showed significantly faster returns than predicted from the purely passive model, indicative of active error corrections. Systematic adaptations in the racket trajectories were a monotonic function of the perturbation magnitudes, indicating that active control was applied in proportion to the perturbation. These results did not indicate any sensitivity to the boundary of stability. Yet the influence of passive dynamics was also seen: the pattern of relaxation times in the major performance variable ball height was consistent with qualitative predictions derived from the basin of attraction and racket accelerations at contact were generally negative signaling use of passive stability. These findings suggest that the fast return back to steady state was assisted by passive properties of the task. It was concluded that actors used a blend of active and passive control for all sizes of perturbations.

[1]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Actuating a simple 3D passive dynamic walker , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[2]  S. Schaal,et al.  Bouncing a ball: tuning into dynamic stability. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  Jirí Hrebícek,et al.  Solving Problems in Scientific Computing Using Maple and MATLAB® , 2004, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[4]  D. Sternad,et al.  Actively tracking ‘passive’ stability in a ball bouncing task , 2003, Brain Research.

[5]  D Sternad,et al.  Dynamics of a bouncing ball in human performance. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  M. Coleman,et al.  The simplest walking model: stability, complexity, and scaling. , 1998, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  From stable to chaotic juggling: theory, simulation, and experiments , 1990, Proceedings., IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[8]  S. Schaal,et al.  One-Handed Juggling: A Dynamical Approach to a Rhythmic Movement Task. , 1996, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Sensorless stabilization of bounce juggling , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[10]  Crawford Lindsey,et al.  The physics and technology of tennis , 2004 .

[11]  A. Hof,et al.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees. , 2007, Gait & posture.

[12]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Passive-Dynamic Walking Robot with Two Legs and Knees , 2001, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Nicholas B. Tufillaro,et al.  Experimental approach to nonlinear dynamics and chaos , 1992, Studies in nonlinearity.

[14]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  A 3D passive dynamic biped with yaw and roll compensation , 2001, Robotica.

[15]  M. Coleman,et al.  An Uncontrolled Walking Toy That Cannot Stand Still , 1998 .

[16]  Daniel E. Koditschek,et al.  Planning and Control of Robotic Juggling and Catching Tasks , 1994, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[17]  Miriam Zacksenhouse,et al.  Oscillatory neural networks for robotic yo-yo control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[18]  Philippe Lefèvre,et al.  Visual feedback influences bimanual coordination in a rhythmic task. , 2006 .

[19]  W. H. Warren The dynamics of perception and action. , 2006, Psychological review.

[20]  D. Sternad,et al.  Control of ball-racket interactions in rhythmic propulsion of elastic and non-elastic balls , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  P. J. Holmes The dynamics of repeated impacts with a sinusoidally vibrating table , 1982 .

[22]  S. Sankar,et al.  Repeated impacts on a sinusoidally vibrating table reappraised , 1986 .

[23]  Benoît G. Bardy,et al.  Learning new perception–action solutions in virtual ball bouncing , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Karl M. Newell,et al.  Constraints on the Development of Coordination , 1986 .

[25]  A. Kuo,et al.  Active control of lateral balance in human walking. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Martijn Wisse,et al.  Design and Construction of MIKE; a 2-D Autonomous Biped Based on Passive Dynamic Walking , 2006 .

[27]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[28]  Russ Tedrake,et al.  Efficient Bipedal Robots Based on Passive-Dynamic Walkers , 2005, Science.

[29]  Arend L. Schwab,et al.  Basin of Attraction of the Simplest Walking Model , 2001 .

[30]  T. McMahon,et al.  Ballistic walking: an improved model , 1980 .

[31]  Dagmar Sternad,et al.  The dialogue between data and model: passive stability and relaxation behavior in a ball bouncing task , 2004 .

[32]  S. Schaal,et al.  Bouncing a ball: tuning into dynamic stability. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  Tad McGeer,et al.  Passive Dynamic Walking , 1990, Int. J. Robotics Res..