Bureaucratic factors in the adoption of gis by public organizations: Preliminary evidence from public administrators and planners☆

Abstract Among the goals of the National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis is the development of programs to transfer knowledge about GIS to public organizations. Achievement of this goal depends on a number of factors, among them technical, financial, and political conditions, as well as bureaucratic structures that influence the adoption of new innovations generally, and GIS specifically. In this paper, I argue that because of organizational reliance on “standard operating procedures” on the one hand, and professional training and socialization on the other, public organizations tend to favor the status quo, while public administrators screen out the geographical components of professional tasks and rely on nongeographic information systems. This argument is based on a theoretical understanding of bureaucracy, organizational decision-making, and the search for information used by organizations in the decision-making process. I provide support for this argument based on a study of the use of geographic information by public administrators and planners, as evidenced by the presence of maps, within the professional publications of the American Society for Public Administration and the American Institute of Certified Planners/American Planning Association.

[1]  Reply to Comments on “Automated Geography” , 1983 .

[2]  R. Abler,et al.  What Shall We Say? To Whom Shall We Speak?1 , 1987 .

[3]  Automated Geography: What Are the Real Challenges? , 1983 .

[4]  J. Steinbruner The Cybernetic Theory of Decision , 1976 .

[5]  K. David Pijawka,et al.  Societal Response to Hazards and Major Hazard Events: Comparing Natural and Technological Hazards , 2022, The Social Contours of Risk.

[6]  Herbert A. Simon Decision-Making and Administrative Organization , 1944 .

[7]  George J. Gordon Public administration in America , 1982 .

[8]  C. Goodsell The case for bureaucracy : a public administration polemic , 1983 .

[9]  Andrew McNally “YOU CAN'T GET THERE FROM HERE”WITH TODAY'S APPROACH TO GEOGRAPHY , 1987 .

[10]  D. Gregory,et al.  The Dictionary of Human Geography , 1983 .

[11]  James G. March,et al.  Theories of choice and making decisions , 1982 .

[12]  Earl F. Epstein,et al.  The use and value of a geodetic reference system , 1984 .

[13]  F. Lane Current Issues in Public Administration , 1978 .

[14]  H. Simon,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization. , 1959 .

[15]  Automated Geography: Some Problems and Pitfalls , 1983 .

[16]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[17]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Computers and Politics: High Technology in American Local Governments , 1982 .

[18]  M. Douglas How Institutions Think , 1986 .

[19]  David J. Cowen,et al.  GIS versus CAD versus DBMS: What are the Differences? Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing , 1990 .

[20]  V. A. Thompson Bureaucracy and the modern world , 1976 .

[21]  Robert K. Merton,et al.  Bureaucratic Structure and Personality , 1940 .

[22]  Phillip C. Muehrcke WHATEVER HAPPENED TO GEOGRAPHIC CARTOGRAPHY , 1981 .

[23]  V. A. Thompson Bureaucracy and innovation , 1969 .

[24]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Technological Innovation in American Local Governments: The Case of Computing , 1980 .

[25]  J. March,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm , 1964 .