Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over frontal eye fields disrupts visually cued auditory attention

Voluntary eye movements and covert shifts of visual attention activate the same brain regions. Specifically, the intraparietal sulcus and the frontal eye fields (FEF) appear to be involved both with generating voluntary saccades as well with attending to a peripheral spatial location. Furthermore, these regions appear to be required by both tasks--functional disruption of these regions impairs both tasks. Therefore, it appears that the targeting system that allows us to plan saccades is the same system that allows us to covertly track peripheral visual information. Recent neuroimaging studies suggest that these brain regions are also activated when participants engage in auditory spatial attention tasks. However, it remains unclear whether these regions are required by these tasks. We used repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to disrupt the FEF while participants performed an auditory localization task. On each trial, a visual cue directed attention to the probable laterality of the auditory target, and the participant decided whether the subsequent target sound came from an upper or lower speaker. In the absence of TMS, individuals were faster to respond to targets that occurred on the cued side (valid trials) than when the target appears contralaterally to the cued side (invalid side). TMS interfered with this effect, such that the costs associated with ipsilateral invalidly cued targets were substantially reduced. These results suggest that the eye-movement system is needed for normal auditory attention.

[1]  Björn N. S. Vlaskamp,et al.  TMS pulses on the frontal eye fields break coupling between visuospatial attention and eye movements. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Katsumi Aoki,et al.  Recent development of flow visualization , 2004, J. Vis..

[3]  Gianluca Campana,et al.  Left frontal eye field remembers “where” but not “what” , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  J. Driver,et al.  Audiovisual links in endogenous covert spatial attention. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Tony Ro,et al.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[6]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Endogenously Generated and Visually Guided Saccades after Lesions of the Human Frontal Eye Fields , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[8]  Eric Castet,et al.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of visual attention during saccade preparation: Independence and coupling between attention and movement planning. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[9]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Toward Establishing a Therapeutic Window for rTMS by Theta Burst Stimulation , 2005, Neuron.

[10]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Driver,et al.  Gaze Direction Modulates Auditory Spatial Deficits in Stroke Patients with Neglect , 2005, Cortex.

[12]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Human frontal eye fields and visual search. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  E. DeYoe,et al.  A comparison of visual and auditory motion processing in human cerebral cortex. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[16]  Mark S. George,et al.  Development and evaluation of a portable sham transcranial magnetic stimulation system , 2008, Brain Stimulation.

[17]  R. Rafal,et al.  Localization of the human frontal eye fields and motor hand area with transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[18]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Timing of Target Discrimination in Human Frontal Eye Fields , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  A. Treisman Strategies and models of selective attention. , 1969, Psychological review.

[20]  C. Rorden,et al.  Covert orienting of attention and overt eye movements activate identical brain regions , 2008, Brain Research.

[21]  T Moore,et al.  Control of eye movements and spatial attention. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  New light through old windows: Moving beyond the “virtual lesion” approach to transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, NeuroImage.

[24]  J. Driver,et al.  Does auditory attention shift in the direction of an upcoming saccade? , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Tomás Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye ®eld Facilitates Visual Awareness , 2022 .

[26]  G. S. Russo,et al.  Frontal eye field activity preceding aurally guided saccades. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[28]  John C. Adair,et al.  The neural networks underlying endogenous auditory covert orienting and reorienting , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Frontal eye field activity before visual search errors reveals the integration of bottom-up and top-down salience. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  E. C. Cherry Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears , 1953 .

[33]  R. Rafal Oculomotor Functions of the Parietal Lobe: Effects of Chronic Lesions in Humans , 2006, Cortex.

[34]  Takashi R Sato,et al.  Effects of Stimulus-Response Compatibility on Neural Selection in Frontal Eye Field , 2003, Neuron.

[35]  Katherine M. Armstrong,et al.  Visuomotor Origins of Covert Spatial Attention , 2003, Neuron.

[36]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  On the role of frontal eye field in guiding attention and saccades , 2004, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Woldorff,et al.  The neural circuitry underlying the executive control of auditory spatial attention , 2007, Brain Research.

[39]  Anna C Nobre,et al.  FEF TMS affects visual cortical activity. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  T A Mondor,et al.  On the role of eye movements and saccade preparation in generating auditory inhibition of return. , 2000, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[41]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  J D Schall,et al.  Dynamic dissociation of visual selection from saccade programming in frontal eye field. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.