Artificial insemination in pig, its status and future perspective in India: A review

The pig production must be sustainable, efficient and competitive to minimize its impact on environment. There is argument to keep fewer breedable animals to produce more numbers of piglets. In India, pig rearing is still done on traditional manner with low productivity. Artificial insemination (AI) is the best reproductive technology available in the current scenario for enhancing the efficiency of pig production in a sustainable way. This in pig involves, collection of semen, processing in laboratory, packaging in 80 to 90 ml semen pouch containing two to three billion spermatozoa and inseminating the sow at correct time. AI in pig is used widely in the world with the use of freshly diluted semen. The use of AI has allowed significant improvement in swine population over the world. Besides genetic improvement, it allows for better maintenance of farm record, saving farm labour and prevents disease transmission. Artificial insemination in northeast India has been introduced only recently but the response from the different stakeholders is quite favourable. In order to replicate the successes achieved in different countries, a proper understanding of the technique, its adaptability to local conditions and the regulations need to be put in place. The establishment of support services is vital to achieve success. The technology has the potential for enhancing the profitability of pig farming in sustainable way. To reap the full potential of this technology, concerted efforts are needed from all stakeholders.

[1]  P. Sharma,et al.  Tribal farmers' traditional knowledge and practices for pig farming in Nagaland , 2019, The Indian Journal of Animal Sciences.

[2]  R. Biswas,et al.  Pre-freezing Treatment with Butylated Hydroxytoluene and Cholesterol-loaded Methyl-β-cyclodextrin Improves Quality of Cryopreserved Boar Semen. , 2018, Cryo letters.

[3]  S. Webel,et al.  Effect of numbers of sperm and timing of a single, post-cervical insemination on the fertility of weaned sows treated with OvuGel®. , 2015, Theriogenology.

[4]  R. Knox Artificial insemination in pigs today. , 2016, Theriogenology.

[5]  R. Knox Recent advancements in the hormonal stimulation of ovulation in swine , 2015, Veterinary medicine.

[6]  M. Yeste,et al.  The improving effect of reduced glutathione on boar sperm cryotolerance is related with the intrinsic ejaculate freezability. , 2014, Cryobiology.

[7]  S. Ghosh,et al.  Seminal PDC-109 protein vis-à-vis cholesterol content and freezability of buffalo spermatozoa. , 2014, Animal reproduction science.

[8]  A. Kumaresan,et al.  Artificial insemination of pigs reared under smallholder production system in northeastern India: success rate, genetic improvement, and monetary benefit , 2013, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[9]  M. H. Khan,et al.  Effect of different extenders on cryopreservation of Hampshire and crossbred boar semen , 2012 .

[10]  Maes Dominiek,et al.  Artificial Insemination in Pigs , 2011 .

[11]  D. Varner,et al.  Low dose insemination. , 2011 .

[12]  W. Flowers Selection for boar fertility and semen quality--the way ahead. , 2020, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[13]  A. Kumaresan,et al.  Integrated resource-driven pig production systems in a mountainous area of Northeast India: production practices and pig performance , 2009, Tropical Animal Health and Production.

[14]  A. de Kruif,et al.  Diseases in swine transmitted by artificial insemination: an overview. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[15]  T. Safranski,et al.  An update on North American boar stud practices. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[16]  W. Dixon,et al.  Identifying useable semen. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[17]  J. Roca,et al.  Low-dose insemination in pigs: problems and possibilities. , 2008, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[18]  B. Kemp,et al.  Effects of boar stimuli on the follicular phase and on oestrous behaviour in sows. , 2019, Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement.

[19]  Cécile Cornou,et al.  Automated oestrus detection methods in group housed sows: Review of the current methods and perspectives for development , 2006 .

[20]  J. Roca,et al.  Improving the efficiency of sperm technologies in pigs: the value of deep intrauterine insemination. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[21]  J. Lunney,et al.  Perspectives for artificial insemination and genomics to improve global swine populations. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[22]  E. Kommisrud,et al.  Influence of Boar and Semen Parameters on Motility and Acrosome Integrity in Liquid Boar Semen Stored for Five Days , 2002, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[23]  W. Flowers Management of boars for efficient semen production. , 2020, Journal of reproduction and fertility. Supplement.

[24]  J. Ko,et al.  Toxicity effects of latex gloves on boar spermatozoa. , 1989, Theriogenology.

[25]  L. Zaneveld,et al.  Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. , 1984, Journal of reproduction and fertility.

[26]  P. F. Watson Use of a Giemsa stain to detect changes in acrosomes of frozen ram spermatozoa , 1975, Veterinary Record.

[27]  J. Mcarthur Diseases of the reproductive system. , 1952, Annual review of medicine.