Adaptive mixed-integer programming unit commitment strategy for determining the value of forecasting

This paper presents the development of a method to determine the value of forecasting (for load, wind power, etc.) in electricity-generation. An adaptive unit commitment (UC) strategy has been developed for this aim. An electricity generator faces demand with a given uncertainty. Forecasts are made to meet this load at the lowest cost. The adaptive UC strategy can be described as follows. Each hour, the generating company constructs a new forecast for a fixed number of hours. We assume that the first forecasted hour is in fact predicted correctly. For these forecasted hours, an optimal UC schedule is determined (given the on/off states of power plants for the current hour). The solution for the first hour (i.e., the one that was predicted correctly) is retained, and a new forecast is made. A 15,000Â MW power system is used in a 168 hour (one-week) schedule. The UC problems presented in this work are solved through a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) approach. In the first case, the effect of limited (correct) forecasting is investigated. Forecasts are made 100% correctly, but the UC scheme is built modularly and compared with the reference case, where the UC problem is solved for the one-week problem as a whole. Depending on the number of forecasted hours, solutions differ by up to 0.5% with the reference case. In a second case, when a certain error is imposed on the forecasts made (up to 5%), the deviations from the optimal solution become larger and amount in certain cases to almost 1%.

[1]  Wei-Jen Lee,et al.  Improve the unit commitment scheduling by using the neural network based short term load forecasting , 2004, Conference, 2004 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Technical.

[2]  G. Sheblé,et al.  Power generation operation and control — 2nd edition , 1996 .

[3]  B. Hobbs,et al.  Analysis of the value for unit commitment of improved load forecasts , 1999 .

[4]  W. D’haeseleer,et al.  Advanced Priority Listing versus Mixed Integer Programming in solving the Unit Commitment problem , 2007 .

[5]  Hesham K. Alfares,et al.  Electric load forecasting: Literature survey and classification of methods , 2002, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[6]  Michael C. Ferris,et al.  MATLAB and GAMS: Interfacing Optimization and Visualization Software , 1999 .

[7]  M. Carrion,et al.  A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  G. Nemhauser,et al.  Integer Programming , 2020 .

[9]  N. Amjady,et al.  Joint market clearing in a stochastic framework considering power system security , 2009 .

[10]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[11]  Young-Hyun Moon,et al.  Stochastic analysis of the uncertain hourly load demand applying to unit commitment problem , 2000, 2000 Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting (Cat. No.00CH37134).

[12]  T. Funabashi,et al.  Absolute stochastic simulated annealing approach to unit commitment problem , 2005, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems.

[13]  Eric R. Zieyel Operations research : applications and algorithms , 1988 .

[14]  T. Niknam,et al.  A new decomposition approach for the thermal unit commitment problem , 2009 .

[15]  D. P. Kothari,et al.  Optimal thermal generating unit commitment: a review , 1998 .

[16]  N.P. Padhy,et al.  Unit commitment-a bibliographical survey , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  Alireza Khotanzad,et al.  The Economic Value of Temperature Forecasts in Electricity Generation , 2005 .