Orchestrating households as collectives of participation in the distributed energy transition: New empirical and conceptual insights

[1]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[2]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[3]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[4]  Adrian Smith,et al.  The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions , 2005 .

[5]  Mads Borup,et al.  The sociology of expectations in science and technology , 2006, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[6]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[7]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[8]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Translating Sustainabilities between Green Niches and Socio-Technical Regimes , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[9]  M. Aune.  Energy comes home , 2007 .

[10]  P. Devine‐Wright.  Energy Citizenship: Psychological Aspects of Evolution in Sustainable Energy Technologies , 2007 .

[11]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[12]  F. Chapin,et al.  A safe operating space for humanity , 2009, Nature.

[13]  Michael Nye,et al.  Making energy visible: A qualitative field study of how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors , 2010 .

[14]  J. Grin,et al.  Transitions to Sustainable Development: New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change , 2010 .

[15]  H. Rohracher,et al.  'Energy regions': The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures , 2010 .

[16]  F. Geels.  Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective , 2010 .

[17]  Eleftheria Vasileiadou,et al.  Transitions: Taking Complexity Seriously , 2010 .

[18]  J. Meadowcroft.  Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions , 2011 .

[19]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[20]  Rob Raven,et al.  What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability , 2012 .

[21]  M. Orsini,et al.  Household appropriation of electricity monitors , 2011 .

[22]  N. Marres,et al.  Materials and devices of the public: an introduction , 2011 .

[23]  T. Schatzki.  Where the Action Is (On Large Social Phenomena Such as Sociotechnical Regimes) , 2011 .

[24]  U. Jørgensen.  Mapping and navigating transitions—The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development , 2012 .

[25]  M. Lawhon,et al.  Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[26]  Fiona Bradley,et al.  Energy autonomy in sustainable communities—A review of key issues , 2012 .

[27]  Henrik Karlstrøm.  Empowering markets? : The construction and maintenance of a deregulated market for electricity in Norway , 2012 .

[28]  H. van Lente,et al.  Navigating foresight in a sea of expectations: lessons from the sociology of expectations , 2012 .

[29]  Yolande Strengers,et al.  Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia? , 2013 .

[30]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[31]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change , 2013 .

[32]  James Wilsdon,et al.  Why should we promote public engagement with science? , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[33]  Y. Parag,et al.  More than filler: Middle actors and socio-technical change in the energy system from the “middle-out” , 2014 .

[34]  T. M. Skjølsvold,et al.  Back to the futures: Retrospecting the prospects of smart grid technology , 2014 .

[35]  Jonathan Rutherford,et al.  Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change , 2014 .

[36]  K. Araújo.  The emerging field of energy transitions: Progress, challenges, and opportunities , 2014 .

[37]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  Adoption of smart grid technologies: An analysis of interactions among barriers , 2014 .

[38]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Spaces for sustainable innovation: Solar photovoltaic electricity in the UK , 2014 .

[39]  S. Jasanoff.  A mirror for science , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[40]  S. Nyborg.  Pilot users and their families - inventing flexible practices in the smart grid , 2015 .

[41]  C. Lindkvist,et al.  Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: Insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project , 2015 .

[42]  M. Ramana,et al.  Back to the Future , 2015 .

[43]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Material participation and the smart grid: Exploring different modes of articulation , 2015 .

[44]  Heidrun Åm.  The sun also rises in Norway: Solar scientists as transition actors , 2015 .

[45]  B. V. Vliet,et al.  Households as change agents in a Dutch smart energy transition: On power, privacy and participation , 2015 .

[46]  I. Ballo.  Imagining energy futures: Sociotechnical imaginaries of the future Smart Grid in Norway , 2015 .

[47]  Tomas Moe Skjølsvold,et al.  Embedding smart energy technology in built environments: A comparative study of four smart grid demonstration projects , 2015 .

[48]  I. Røpke.  Sustainable Consumption: Transitions, Systems and Practices , 2015 .

[49]  Tobie Kerridge,et al.  Energy Babble: Mixing Environmentally-Oriented Internet Content to Engage Community Groups , 2015, CHI.

[50]  E. Vasileiadou,et al.  "Let's do it ourselves" : individual motivations for investing in renewables at community level , 2015 .

[51]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Smart grid solutions in the everyday life of households: Electric vehicles and time-of-use pricing , 2016 .

[52]  J. Meadowcroft,et al.  Framing the sun: A discursive approach to understanding multi-dimensional interactions within socio-technical transitions through the case of solar electricity in Ontario, Canada , 2016 .

[53]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  Participation in Transition(s): Reconceiving Public Engagements in Energy Transitions as Co-Produced, Emergent and Diverse , 2016 .

[54]  Katherine Ellsworth-Krebs,et al.  Conceptualising energy prosumption: Exploring energy production, consumption and microgeneration in Scotland, UK , 2016 .

[55]  Christoph Schneider,et al.  Transforming power/knowledge apparatuses: the smart grid in the German energy transition , 2016 .

[56]  M. Boucher.  Decentralized Energy: Prospects, Justice, and Transition , 2016 .

[57]  U. Jørgensen,et al.  Creating Copenhagen's Metro - On the role of protected spaces in arenas of development , 2016 .

[58]  Johan Schot,et al.  The roles of users in shaping transitions to new energy systems , 2016, Nature Energy.

[59]  K. Janda,et al.  Using stories, narratives, and storytelling in energy and climate change research , 2017 .

[60]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  From consumer to prosumer: Enrolling users into a Norwegian PV pilot , 2017 .

[61]  Meiken Hansen,et al.  Prosumers and smart grid technologies in Denmark: developing user competences in smart grid households , 2017 .

[62]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Adoption and Use of Low-Carbon Technologies: Lessons from 100 Finnish Pilot Studies, Field Experiments and Demonstrations , 2017 .

[63]  D. Lazarevic,et al.  Narrating expectations for the circular economy: Towards a common and contested European transition , 2017 .

[64]  S. Sorrell,et al.  Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization , 2017, Science.

[65]  S. Bell,et al.  Domesticating In Home Displays in selected British and Norwegian households , 2017 .

[66]  Tomas Moe Skjølsvold,et al.  Users, design and the role of feedback technologies in the Norwegian energy transition: An empirical study and some radical challenges , 2017 .

[67]  Meiken Hansen,et al.  Scripting, control, and privacy in domestic smart grid technologies: insights from a Danish pilot study , 2017 .

[68]  Katherine Ellsworth-Krebs,et al.  Practicing energy prosumption: Using unsolicited online data to reveal the everyday realities of solar thermal panels in the United Kingdom , 2017 .

[69]  Charlie Wilson,et al.  Smart Homes and Their Users , 2017, Human–Computer Interaction Series.

[70]  D. Huitema,et al.  Experiments in climate governance – A systematic review of research on energy and built environment transitions , 2017 .

[71]  G. Spaargaren,et al.  When social practices meet smart grids : Flexibility, grid management, and domestic consumption in The Netherlands , 2017 .

[72]  Rolf Naber,et al.  Scaling up sustainable energy innovations , 2017 .

[73]  T. H. Christensen,et al.  Changing practices of energy consumption: The influence of smart grid solutions in households , 2017 .

[74]  Joanna Williams,et al.  Lost in translation: Translating low carbon experiments into new spatial contexts viewed through the mobile-transitions lens , 2017 .

[75]  Tom Hargreaves,et al.  Ecologies of participation in socio-technical change: The case of energy system transitions , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[76]  Thea Sofie Melhuus Hojem,et al.  Articulations of sustainability transition agency. Mundane transition work among consulting engineers , 2018 .

[77]  George Papachristos,et al.  A mechanism based transition research methodology: Bridging analytical approaches , 2018 .

[78]  J. Palm.  Household installation of solar panels – Motives and barriers in a 10-year perspective , 2018 .

[79]  Marianne Ryghaug,et al.  Creating energy citizenship through material participation , 2018, Social studies of science.

[80]  T. Pallesen,et al.  Organizing consumers for a decarbonized electricity system: Calculative agencies and user scripts in a Danish demonstration project , 2018 .

[81]  T. Berker,et al.  Domestication, acceptance and zero emission ambitions: Insights from a mixed method, experimental research design in a Norwegian Living Lab , 2018 .