Emphasizing the communication aspects for the successful development of electronic business systems

Abstract.In order to be successful, web-based electronic business systems have to be developed in such a way that both the customers’ needs and the business intentions of the provider are met. As human-to-human interaction is partly replaced by human-computer interaction in such systems, this requires anticipating the users’ behaviour and paying a lot of attention to the communication aspects.In this article a development method is suggested that emphasizes the communication aspects in web-based systems. It is based on user profiling and story boarding. User profiles can be used to classify user needs as well as the various kinds of system support for them. The story board describes stories, i.e. navigation paths of users through the system, which can be used to model the behaviour of users.To discover user profiles and stories, two interleaved activities are suggested: communication analysis and linguistic analysis. Communication analysis addresses typical human-to-human interaction in the application domain and classifies typical communication barriers. We argue that using localisation abstraction and metaphors can help to overcome communication barriers, implying that their use may enhance the users’ understanding and successful navigation through a web site. Linguistic analysis addresses how the activities of the users would be described in natural language. Analysing the used word fields and metaphorical structures may provide guidance for centering the story board around the central activities. We use a typical banking application, on-line loan systems, as an example to illustrate our method.

[1]  Klaus-Dieter Schewe,et al.  Integrating Database and Dialogue Design , 2000, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[2]  Nicolas Spyratos,et al.  Querying Contextualized Information Bases , 1999 .

[3]  D. G. MacKay,et al.  Metaphor and Thought , 1980 .

[4]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  SiteLang: Conceptual Modeling of Internet Sites , 2001, ER.

[5]  Warren Raisch,et al.  The eMarketplace: Strategies for Success in B2B eCommerce , 2000 .

[6]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  The use of metaphorical structures for internet sites , 2000, Data Knowl. Eng..

[7]  Cem Kaner UCITA: A Disaster in Progress By treating a transaction for software as a license rather than a sale, the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act would cost us all dearly , 2002 .

[8]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Objektorientierter Datenbankentwurf in der Entwicklung datenintensiver Informationssysteme , 1995, Informatik Forschung und Entwicklung.

[9]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Knowledge Representation , 1998 .

[10]  Ron Weber,et al.  Conceptual Modeling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls , 2003, J. Database Manag..

[11]  Z. Kövecses,et al.  Metaphor: A Practical Introduction , 2002 .

[12]  G. Rossi,et al.  An Object Oriented Approach to Web-Based Application Design , 1998 .

[13]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  Web Application Models Are More Than Conceptual Models , 1999, ER.

[14]  Klaus-Dieter Schewe,et al.  Modelling Web-Based Banking Systems: Story Boarding and User Profiling , 2002, ER.

[15]  Judith Dwyer,et al.  The Business Communication Handbook , 1997 .

[16]  George Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things , 1987 .

[17]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Interface metaphors and user interface design , 1988 .

[18]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  An ontological analysis of the relationship construct in conceptual modeling , 1999, TODS.

[19]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Modeling Interaction and Media Objects , 2000, NLDB.

[20]  Gustavo Rossi,et al.  An Object Oriented Approach to Web-Based Applications Design , 1998, Theory Pract. Object Syst..

[21]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Linguistic based search facilities in snowflake-like database schemes , 2004, Data Knowl. Eng..

[22]  R. Chisholm A Realistic Theory of Categories: An Essay on Ontology , 1998 .

[23]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  HDM—a model-based approach to hypertext application design , 1993, TOIS.

[24]  Nicolas Spyratos,et al.  Context in information bases , 1998, Proceedings. 3rd IFCIS International Conference on Cooperative Information Systems (Cat. No.98EX122).

[25]  Paolo Merialdo,et al.  Design and Maintenance of Data-Intensive Web Sites , 1998, EDBT.

[26]  Stefano Ceri,et al.  Designing Data-Intensive Web Applications , 2002 .

[27]  Klaus-Dieter Schewe,et al.  A user-centered method for the development of data-intensive dialogue systems: an object-oriented approach , 1995, ISCO.

[28]  Simon K. Milton,et al.  An ontological study of data modelling languages using Chisholm's ontology , 2001 .

[29]  Bernhard Thalheim,et al.  Conceptual modelling of web information systems , 2005, Data Knowl. Eng..

[30]  Phillip G. Clampitt Communicating for Managerial Effectiveness , 1991 .

[31]  Mary Czerwinski,et al.  Web page design: implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval , 1998, CHI.

[32]  Friedemann Schulz von Thun,et al.  Miteinander reden / 1 Störungen und Klärungen : Psychologie der zwischenmenschlichen Kommunikation , 1983 .

[33]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1981 .

[34]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems development and data modelling: conceptual and philosophical foundations , 1995 .

[35]  Catherine Wallace,et al.  Communication: Key to Success on the Web , 2002, ER.

[36]  Klaus-Dieter Schewe,et al.  View-Centered Conceptual Modelling - An Object-Oriented Approach , 1996, ER.

[37]  Marsha Durham Organisational websites: how and how well do they communicate? , 2000 .

[38]  Martin Gaedke,et al.  Generic Web-Based Federation of Business Application Systems for E-Commerce Applications , 1999, EFIS.

[39]  Stefano Ceri,et al.  Building Multi-device, Content-Centric Applications Using WebML and the W3I3 Tool Suite , 2000, ER.

[40]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[41]  Roland H. Kaschek,et al.  Where Ontology Affects Information Systems , 2003, ISTA.

[42]  Luciano Baresi,et al.  From Web Sites to Web Applications: New Issues for Conceptual Modeling , 2000, ER.

[43]  E. Tansley,et al.  Using ontology to validate conceptual models , 2003, CACM.

[44]  Jeffrey Parsons,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation of Property Precedence in Conceptual Modelling , 2004, APCCM.