Discovery and Characterization of QPT-1, the Progenitor of a New Class of Bacterial Topoisomerase Inhibitors (cid:1) †

QPT-1 was discovered in a compound library by high-throughput screening and triage for substances with whole-cell antibacterial activity. This totally synthetic compound is an unusual barbituric acid derivative whose activity resides in the ( (cid:1) )-enantiomer. QPT-1 had activity against a broad spectrum of pathogenic, antibiotic-resistant bacteria, was nontoxic to eukaryotic collection. Generation of resistant strains. Either ethyl methanesulfonate-mutagenized Staphylococcus aureus cultures prepared as described previously (16) or untreated S. aureus cultures (for spontaneous resistance) were grown at 37°C to an optical density at 600 nm of 1.0 (cid:2) 10 10 , and 100 (cid:3) l was plated on Mueller-Hinton agar plates which contained 4 (cid:3) g/ml PNU-286607 or ciprofloxacin. Individual resistant colonies were confirmed by restreaking the colonies and subsequent MIC analysis (see Tables 2 and 4). The gyrAB and parCE topoisomerase genes from these and other resistant strains were amplified by PCR and sequenced at the Pfizer (formerly Pharmacia) sequencing core facility. Molecular biology. Genomic DNA was isolated from overnight cultures of S. aureus grown in brain heart infusion medium with a FastDNA kit (Qbiogene, 20, 30, 60, 120, 240, 360, and 480 min. The vehicle for the oral formulation was pH 4.5 acetate-buffered, 20% DMSO-methylcellulose suspension. The vehicle for the intravenous formulation was 20% hydroxypropyl beta-cyclodextrin (pH 7 phosphate buffer). The extent of binding of PNU-286607 to mouse plasma was determined by ultracentrifugation. PNU-286607 demonstrated moderate binding (70%), with the ( (cid:5) )- and ( (cid:1) )-enantiomers showing similar levels of protein binding in mouse plasma. Phar- macokinetic analysis was performed by noncompartmental analysis using Watson Laboratory Information Management System (Thermo, Inc., Philadelphia, PA). The mean concentration-time data (three mice per time point) were used for calculation of the values of the pharmacokinetic parameters.

[1]  Alexander Tomasz,et al.  Tracking the in vivo evolution of multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by whole-genome sequencing , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  Nadine H. Elowe,et al.  Inhibitors of bacterial cystathionine beta-lyase: leads for new antimicrobial agents and probes of enzyme structure and function. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  D. Pompliano,et al.  Drugs for bad bugs: confronting the challenges of antibacterial discovery , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[4]  K. Marotti,et al.  Allosteric inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus d-alanine:d-alanine ligase revealed by crystallographic studies , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. Bartlett,et al.  Bad bugs need drugs: an update on the development pipeline from the Antimicrobial Availability Task Force of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. , 2006, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  David D. Anderson,et al.  Structure‐based Optimization of MurF Inhibitors , 2006, Chemical biology & drug design.

[7]  L. Peterson Squeezing the antibiotic balloon: the impact of antimicrobial classes on emerging resistance , 2005, Clinical Microbiology and Infection.

[8]  T. Nishino,et al.  Accumulation of Mutations in both gyrB and parE Genes Is Associated with High-Level Resistance to Novobiocin in Staphylococcus aureus , 2005, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[9]  S. Levy Antibiotic resistance-the problem intensifies. , 2005, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[10]  Hinrich W. H. Göhlmann,et al.  A Diarylquinoline Drug Active on the ATP Synthase of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 2005, Science.

[11]  Eric D Brown,et al.  New targets and screening approaches in antimicrobial drug discovery. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[12]  J. Barrett,et al.  Antibiotics: where did we go wrong? , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[13]  D. Ehmann,et al.  Biochemical characterization of an inhibitor of Escherichia coli UDP-N-acetylmuramyl-l-alanine ligase. , 2004, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[14]  Clement S. Chu,et al.  A New Class of Bacterial RNA Polymerase Inhibitor Affects Nucleotide Addition , 2003, Science.

[15]  S. Projan,et al.  Why is big Pharma getting out of antibacterial drug discovery? , 2003, Current opinion in microbiology.

[16]  D. Shlaes The abandonment of antibacterials: why and wherefore? , 2003, Current opinion in pharmacology (Print).

[17]  D. J. Leblanc,et al.  PCR-Based Ordered Genomic Libraries: a New Approach to Drug Target Identification for Streptococcus pneumoniae , 2002, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[18]  D. Hooper Bacterial topoisomerases, anti-topoisomerases, and anti-topoisomerase resistance. , 1998, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[19]  H. Ito,et al.  Quinolone resistance mutations in the DNA gyrase gyrA and gyrB genes of Staphylococcus aureus , 1994, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[20]  K. Bostian,et al.  Discovery and development of new antibiotics: the problem of antibiotic resistance , 1993, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  Jeffrey H. Miller,et al.  A short course in bacterial genetics , 1992 .

[22]  S. Schenk,et al.  Improved method for electroporation of Staphylococcus aureus. , 1992, FEMS microbiology letters.

[23]  J. Waitz Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically , 1990 .

[24]  S. Khan,et al.  Nucleotide sequence of the enterotoxin B gene from Staphylococcus aureus , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  D. Reinhoudt,et al.  "Tert-Amino effect" in heterocyclic synthesis. Formation of N heterocycles by ring-closure reactions of substituted 2-vinyl-N,N-dialkylanilines , 1984 .