Reinvigorating object biography: reproducing the drama of object lives

Abstract The World Archaeology volume ‘The Cultural Biography of Objects’ (Marshall and Gosden 1999) retains its currency ten years after its publication and the ideas highlighted in it continue to be developed. However, the relative success of biographical studies which rely on anthropological or historical information compared with biographical studies of prehistoric objects is evident. Through the example of a British Iron Age mirror this paper explores ways of redressing the difficulties of applying a biographical approach to prehistoric objects.

[1]  Marcia-Anne Dobres,et al.  Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology , 1994 .

[2]  K. Parfitt.  A Late Iron Age Burial from Chilham Castle, near Canterbury, Kent , 1998, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society.

[3]  Chris Gosden,et al.  The cultural biography of objects , 1999 .

[4]  M. Dobres,et al.  Gender and prehistoric technology: On the social agency of technical strategies , 1995 .

[5]  M. Spratling,et al.  The Iron Age Mirror Burial at Pegsdon, Shillington, Bedfordshire: An Interim Account , 2007, The Antiquaries Journal.

[6]  M. A. MacKenzie.  Androgynous Objects: , 1991 .

[7]  H. Williams,et al.  Objects without a Past , 2003 .

[8]  G. Pocius,et al.  Metaphor and Material Culture , 2001 .

[9]  Victoria Castro,et al.  Riders on the storm : rock art in the Atacama Desert (Northern Chile) , 1999 .

[10]  Alfred Gell,et al.  Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory , 1999 .

[11]  Gavin MacGregor,et al.  Making sense of the past in the present: A sensory analysis of carved stone balls , 1999 .

[12]  R. Gould,et al.  Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. , 1997 .

[13]  A. Appadurai,et al.  The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. , 1988 .

[14]  F. Gerritsen.  To build and to abandon , 1999, Archaeological Dialogues.

[15]  M. Schiffer.  The Devil Is in the Details: The Cascade Model of Invention Processes , 2005, American Antiquity.

[16]  M. Schiffer.  Studying technological change: A behavioral perspective , 2004 .

[17]  猪俣 健,et al.  Archaeology of performance : theaters of power, community, and politics , 2006 .

[18]  C. Fox.,et al.  Pattern and Purpose. A survey of early Celtic art in Britain. , 1958 .

[19]  Jody Joy.  Reflections on Celtic Art:: a re-examination of mirror decoration , 2008 .

[20]  Michael B. Schiffer,et al.  Time, Culture and Identity: An Interpretive Archaeology. , 1997 .

[21]  R. Torrence,et al.  In Pursuit of the Past , 1983 .

[22]  Rowan Whimster.  Burial practices in Iron Age Britain , 1979 .

[23]  N. Munn,et al.  The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim , 1986 .

[24]  J. Hoskins.  Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of Peoples' Lives , 1998 .

[25]  C. Tilley.  An Ethnography of the Neolithic: Early Prehistoric Societies in Southern Scandinavia , 1997 .

[26]  Lisa P. Seip.  Transformations of meaning: The life history of a Nuxalk mask , 1999 .

[27]  C. Holtorf.  Monumental Past: The Life-histories of Megalithic Monuments in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) , 2001 .

[28]  J. Hoskins,et al.  Biographical Objects: How Things Tell the Stories of People's Lives , 1999 .

[29]  C. Holtorf.  The life‐histories of megaliths in Mecklenburg‐Vorpommern (Germany) , 1998 .

[30]  N. Munn.  The fame of Gawa : a symbolic study of value transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) society , 1989 .

[31]  A. Appadurai.  The social life of things: Toward an anthropology of thing , 1986 .

[32]  L. Peers.  'Many tender ties': the shifting contexts and meanings of the S BLACK bag , 1999 .

[33]  Marcia-Anne Dobres,et al.  Technology and Social Agency: Outlining a Practice Framework for Archaeology , 1991 .

[34]  James M. Skibo,et al.  The Explanation of Artifact Variability , 1997, American Antiquity.

[35]  M. Vellinga.  Merits and limits of the biographic approach , 1999, Archaeological Dialogues.

[36]  Cornelius Holtorf,et al.  Notes on the Life History of a Pot Sherd , 2002 .

[37]  N. Saunders.  Biographies of brilliance : pearls, transformations of matter and being, c. AD 1492 , 1999 .

[38]  M. Sørensen.  Reading Dress: The Construction of Social Categories and Identities in Bronze Age Europe , 1997 .

[39]  D. Battaglia.  On the Bones of the Serpent: Person, Memory, and Mortality in Sabarl Island Society , 1990 .

[40]  James Whitley.  Objects with Attitude: Biographical Facts and Fallacies in the Study of Late Bronze Age and Early Iron Age Warrior Graves , 2002, Cambridge Archaeological Journal.

[41]  Charles Camp.  Thinking through Material Culture: An Interdisciplinary Perspective , 2008 .

[42]  Robin Taylor.  Hoards of the Bronze Age in southern Britain : analysis and interpretation , 1993 .

[43]  J. Moreland.  The world(s) of the cross , 1999 .

[44]  Entangled biographies : western Pacific ceramics and the tombs of Pohnpei , 1999 .

[45]  Michael B. Schiffer,et al.  The Electric Lighthouse in the Nineteenth Century: Aid to Navigation and Political Technology , 2005 .

[46]  A. Fox,et al.  A Decorated Bronze Mirror from an Iron Age Settlement at Holcombe, Near Uplyme, Devon , 1973, The Antiquaries Journal.

[47]  Diana M. Greenlee,et al.  Archaeological theory and scientific practice , 2004 .

[48]  C. Hendrickson.  Weaving Identities: Construction of Dress and Self in a Highland Guatemala Town , 1995 .

[49]  E. Shorter.  About the history of sexuality. , 2007, Neuropsychopharmacologia Hungarica : a Magyar Pszichofarmakologiai Egyesulet lapja = official journal of the Hungarian Association of Psychopharmacology.

[50]  Gillian Carr,et al.  WOAD, TATTOOING AND IDENTITY IN LATER IRON AGE AND EARLY ROMAN BRITAIN , 2005 .

[51]  Mike Parker Pearson,et al.  The Archaeology of Death and Burial , 1999 .

[52]  Yvonne Marshall.  The social lives of lived and inscribed objects: a Lapita perspective , 2008 .

[53]  M. Gillings,et al.  Non‐portable stone artefacts and contexts of meaning: The tale of Grey Wether (www.museums.ncl.ac.uk/Avebury/stone4.htm) , 1999 .

[54]  R. Jackson,et al.  Cosmetic sets from Late Iron Age and Roman Britain , 1985, Britannia.

[55]  R. Tringham.  Engendered places in prehistory , 1994 .

[56]  James M. Skibo,et al.  Behavioral Archaeology and the Study of Technology , 2001, American Antiquity.

[57]  Y. Hamilakis.  Stories from exile: Fragments from the cultural biography of the Parthenon (or ‘Elgin') marbles , 1999 .

[58]  Jody Joy.  Biography of a medal: people and the things they value , 2003 .

[59]  Jillian C. York.  The life cycle of bronze age metalwork from the Thames , 2002 .

[60]  S. Jundi,et al.  Brooches and Identities in First Century AD Britain: More Than Meets The Eye? , 1998 .

[61]  F. Dussart.  Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. , 2000 .

[62]  D. Fontijn.  Sacrificial Landscapes: Cultural biographies of persons, objects and 'natural' places in the Bronze Age of the southern Netherlands, c. 2300-600 BC , 2002 .

[63]  M. Schiffer.  Archaeological Context and Systemic Context , 1972, American Antiquity.

[64]  Igor Kopytoff.  The social life of things: The cultural biography of things: commoditization as process , 1986 .

[65]  A. Woodward.  Beads and Beakers: heirlooms and relics in the British Early Bronze Age , 2002, Antiquity.

[66]  Bjørnar Olsen,et al.  Material culture after text: re‐membering things , 2003 .

[67]  J. Booker,et al.  Discussion-•-— »-— — — — — , 1998 .

[68]  I. Stead.  Celtic Art: In Britain before the Roman Conquest , 1996 .

[69]  R. Bradley.  The Passage of Arms: An Archaeological Analysis of Prehistoric Hoards and Votive Deposits , 1990 .