Calibration of a Digital Hydrophone Line Array at Low Frequency

The challenges of comparison calibrations of hydrophones in linear arrays at low frequencies are inherent in the length of the array, number of hydrophones, difficulty in achieving free-field conditions, and lack of a suitable low-frequency projector. These challenges were addressed by the development of complementary methods to simultaneously measure the complex sensitivity in the acoustic data channels of hydrophone line arrays with digital telemetry systems. The voltage sensitivities and RC time constants of the array data channels were then estimated by nonlinear regression of calibration data to a simplified model of the acoustic data channel. The methods are demonstrated by the simultaneous calibration of 200 data channels of a digital hydrophone line array at 1/3 octave band center frequencies ranging from 1.2 to 400 Hz. The 95% confidence interval of the voltage sensitivity estimates was not more than 1 dB.

[1]  C. Clay,et al.  Ocean Acoustics: Theory and Experiment in Underwater Sound , 1987 .

[2]  T. Henriquez,et al.  Reciprocity Calibration of a Standard Hydrophone at 16 000 psi , 1964 .

[3]  S. E. Crocker.  System and Method for the Calibration of a Hydrophone Line Array , 1992 .

[4]  K. Foote.  Discriminating between the nearfield and the farfield of acoustic transducers. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  G. W. McMahon.  Complex hydrophone calibrations using pseudo‐Gaussian noise signals , 1977 .

[6]  Charles H. Sherman,et al.  Transducers and Arrays for Underwater Sound , 2008 .

[7]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[8]  J. H. Miller,et al.  Nonlinear Inversion of Acoustic Scalar and Vector Field Transfer Functions , 2012, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[9]  Angelika Täubner,et al.  The influence of different vibration exciter systems on high frequency primary calibration of single-ended accelerometers: II , 2010 .

[10]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[11]  L. Ivey.  High-Pressure Piezoelectric Ceramic Hydrophone for Infrasonic and Audio Frequencies USRD Type H48 , 1971 .

[12]  S. Walsh,et al.  Hydrology, Water Quality, and Aquatic Communities of Selected Springs in the St. Johns River Water Management District, Florida , 2009 .

[13]  H. M. Merklinger.  Automatic comparison calibration of hydrophones using the ambient noise background , 1976 .

[14]  C. H. Sherman,et al.  Spatial‐Correlation Functions for Various Noise Models , 1962 .

[15]  G. M. Wenz.  Acoustic Ambient Noise in the Ocean: Spectra and Sources , 1962 .

[16]  Peter M. Harris,et al.  An international key comparison of free-field hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 1 to 500 kHz , 2006 .