Vocal Features of Conversational Sarcasm: A Comparison of Methods

This study investigated vocal cues that differentiate sarcastic utterances from non-sarcastic utterances. Utterances were drawn from videotapes of participant interviews and arranged on a master tape for analysis. Utterances that were identified as sarcastic by speakers and recognized as sarcastic by listeners were randomly arranged with utterances identified and recognized as non-sarcastic by the same participants. Both sarcastic and non-sarcastic utterances were analyzed by two methods–acoustic analysis and perceptual coding. The acoustic analysis proved slightly more successful than the perceptual coding in discriminating between sarcastic and non-sarcastic utterances. The acoustic analysis indicated that fundamental frequency, frequency range, length of utterance, and total amount of sound significantly discriminated sarcastic from non-sarcastic utterances. The perceptual coding method revealed that pitch range, length of utterance, and total amount of sound significantly discriminated sarcastic from non-sarcastic utterances. Moderate correlations were found between the acoustic and perceptual variables.

[1]  I. Fónagy Synthèse de l’ironie , 1971 .

[2]  Anne Cutler,et al.  On saying what you mean without meaning what you say , 1974 .

[3]  Michael J. Cody,et al.  Deception: Paralinguistic and Verbal Leakage , 1984 .

[4]  Prosodic Variation and Audience Response , 1987 .

[5]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[6]  H. Haverkate A speech act analysis of irony , 1990 .

[7]  R. Gibbs The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding , 1994 .

[8]  R. Kreuz,et al.  Two Cues for Verbal Irony: Hyperbole and the Ironic Tone of Voice , 1995 .

[9]  L. M. Milosky,et al.  The Role of Prosody in Children's Inferences of Ironic Intent. , 1997 .

[10]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Measurement of deceptive voices: Comparing acoustic and perceptual data , 1997, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[11]  J. Haiman Talk Is Cheap: Sarcasm, Alienation, and the Evolution of Language , 1998 .

[12]  P. Rockwell,et al.  Actors', Partners', and Observers' Perceptions of Sarcasm , 2000, Perceptual and motor skills.

[13]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Differential Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor , 2000 .

[14]  P. Rockwell,et al.  Lower, Slower, Louder: Vocal Cues of Sarcasm , 2000 .

[15]  L. Anolli,et al.  Irony as a Game of Implicitness: Acoustic Profiles of Ironic Communication , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[16]  R. Gibbs Irony in Talk Among Friends , 2000 .

[17]  P. Rockwell,et al.  Culture, gender, and gender mix in encoders of sarcasm: A self‐assessment analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Giuseppe Riva,et al.  Say not to say : new perspectives on miscommunication , 2002 .

[19]  I. Poggi,et al.  Multimodal markers of irony and sarcasm , 2003 .

[20]  P. Rockwell,et al.  Empathy and the Expression and Recognition of Sarcasm by Close Relations or Strangers , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.