The hydrological sensitivity to global warming and solar geoengineering derived from thermodynamic constraints

We derive analytic expressions of the response of the hydrological cycle to surface warming from the surface energy balance in which turbulent heat fluxes are constrained by the thermodynamic limit of maximum power. For a given steady state temperature change, this approach predicts the transient and steady state response of surface energy partitioning and the hydrologic cycle. We show that the predicted hydrological sensitivities to greenhouse warming and solar geoengineering are comparable to the results from climate model simulations of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project. Although not all effects can be explained, our approach nevertheless predicts the general trend as well as the magnitude of the changes in the global-scale hydrological cycle surprisingly well. This implies that much of the global-scale changes in the hydrologic cycle can be robustly predicted by the response of the thermodynamically constrained surface energy balance to altered radiative forcing.

[1]  P. Rasch,et al.  Climate model response from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[2]  I. Held,et al.  Entropy budget of an atmosphere in radiative-convective equilibrium , 2000 .

[3]  A simple explanation for the sensitivity of the hydrologic cycle to global climate change , 2013 .

[4]  Kerry A. Emanuel,et al.  Thermodynamic control of hurricane intensity , 1999, Nature.

[5]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity , 2004 .

[6]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A parametric sensitivity study of entropy production and kinetic energy dissipation using the FAMOUS AOGCM , 2012, Climate Dynamics.

[7]  O. Pauluis Entropy budget of an atmosphere in radiative-convective equilibrium , 2000 .

[8]  G. W. Paltridge,et al.  Global dynamics and climate - a system of minimum entropy exchange , 1975 .

[9]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  An energetic perspective on hydrological cycle changes in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project , 2013 .

[10]  Jonathan M. Gregory,et al.  A Surface Energy Perspective on Climate Change , 2009 .

[11]  B. Soden,et al.  Robust Responses of the Hydrological Cycle to Global Warming , 2006 .

[12]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[13]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  Forcings and feedbacks in the GeoMIP ensemble for a reduction in solar irradiance and increase in CO2 , 2014 .

[14]  Axel Kleidon,et al.  Thermodynamic limits of hydrologic cycling within the Earth system: concepts, estimates and implications , 2013 .

[15]  Ralph D. Lorenz,et al.  Titan, Mars and Earth : Entropy production by latitudinal heat transport , 2001 .

[16]  M. Renner,et al.  Estimates of the climatological land surface energy and water balance derived from maximum convective power , 2014 .

[17]  G. Myhre,et al.  New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases , 1998 .

[18]  Mark Lawrence,et al.  An overview of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[19]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Fast versus slow response in climate change: implications for the global hydrological cycle , 2010 .

[20]  T. Andrews,et al.  An update on Earth's energy balance in light of the latest global observations , 2012 .

[21]  K. Fraedrich,et al.  The atmospheric circulation and states of maximum entropy production , 2003 .

[22]  Axel Kleidon,et al.  A simple explanation for the sensitivity of the hydrologic cycle to surface temperature and solar radiation and its implications for global climate change , 2013 .

[23]  G. Boer Climate change and the regulation of the surface moisture and energy budgets , 1993 .

[24]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .