Site-specific ultrasound reflection properties and superficial collagen content of bovine knee articular cartilage

Previous quantitative 2D-ultrasound imaging studies have demonstrated that the ultrasound reflection measurement of articular cartilage surface sensitively detects degradation of the collagen network, whereas digestion of cartilage proteoglycans has no significant effect on the ultrasound reflection. In this study, the first aim was to characterize the ability of quantitative 2D-ultrasound imaging to detect site-specific differences in ultrasound reflection and backscattering properties of cartilage surface and cartilage-bone interface at visually healthy bovine knee (n = 30). As a second aim, we studied factors controlling ultrasound reflection properties of an intact cartilage surface. The ultrasound reflection coefficient was determined in time (R) and frequency domains (IRC) at medial femoral condyle, lateral patello-femoral groove, medial tibial plateau and patella using a 20 MHz ultrasound imaging instrument. Furthermore, cartilage surface roughness was quantified by calculating the ultrasound roughness index (URI). The superficial collagen content of the cartilage was determined using a FT-IRIS-technique. A significant site-dependent variation was shown in cartilage thickness, ultrasound reflection parameters, URI and superficial collagen content. As compared to R and IRC, URI was a more sensitive parameter in detecting differences between the measurement sites. Ultrasound reflection parameters were not significantly related to superficial collagen content, whereas the correlation between R and URI was high. Ultrasound reflection at the cartilage-bone interface showed insignificant site-dependent variation. The current results suggest that ultrasound reflection from the intact cartilage surface is mainly dependent on the cartilage surface roughness and the collagen content has a less significant role.

[1]  B. Ansell Early studies of 198Au in the treatment of synovitis of the knee. , 1973, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[2]  M. Hyttinen,et al.  Mechano-Acoustic Diagnosis of Cartilage Degeneration and Repair , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Investigation of articular cartilage surface morphology with a semiquantitative scanning electron microscopic method. , 1983, Acta anatomica.

[4]  K. Hardinge,et al.  Osteoarthrotic articular cartilage lesions of the femoral head observed in the scanning electron microscope , 1977, The Journal of pathology.

[5]  Freddie H. Fu,et al.  An in situ calibration of an ultrasound transducer: a potential application for an ultrasonic indentation test of articular cartilage. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  P. R. van Weeren,et al.  Functional adaptation of articular cartilage from birth to maturity under the influence of loading: a biomechanical analysis. , 2010, Equine veterinary journal.

[7]  Jukka S. Jurvelin,et al.  Reference Sample Method Reduces the Error Caused by Variable Cryosection Thickness in Fourier Transform Infrared Imaging , 2004, Applied spectroscopy.

[8]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Interspecies comparisons of in situ intrinsic mechanical properties of distal femoral cartilage , 1991, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  Elders Mj The increasing impact of arthritis on public health. , 2000 .

[10]  R W Mann,et al.  Optical verification of a technique for in situ ultrasonic measurement of articular cartilage thickness. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  P. Laugier,et al.  Effect of articular cartilage proteoglycan depletion on high frequency ultrasound backscatter. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

[12]  Jukka S. Jurvelin,et al.  Structure-Function Relationships in Enzymatically Modified Articular Cartilage , 2003, Cells Tissues Organs.

[13]  E. Yelin,et al.  Special article the economic cost and social and psychological impact of musculoskeletal conditions , 1995 .

[14]  H. Helminen,et al.  Collagenase-Induced Changes in Articular Cartilage as Detected by Electron-Microscopic Stereology, Quantitative Polarized Light Microscopy and Biochemical Assays , 2002, Cells Tissues Organs.

[15]  F. Foster,et al.  High Frequency Acoustic Parameters of Human and Bovine Articular Cartilage following Experimentally-Induced Matrix Degradation , 2001, Ultrasonic imaging.

[16]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Speed of sound in normal and degenerated bovine articular cartilage. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[17]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Novel mechano-acoustic technique and instrument for diagnosis of cartilage degeneration. , 2002, Physiological measurement.

[18]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Ultrasonic quantitation of superficial degradation of articular cartilage. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  E. Chérin,et al.  Evaluation of acoustical parameter sensitivity to age-related and osteoarthritic changes in articular cartilage using 50-MHz ultrasound. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  H. J. Mankin,et al.  Instructional Course Lectures, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons - Articular Cartilage. Part II: Degeneration and Osteoarthrosis, Repair, Regeneration, and Transplantation*† , 1997 .

[21]  J. Olerud,et al.  Ultrasonic attenuation in articular cartilage. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Real-time ultrasound analysis of articular cartilage degradation in vitro. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  A. Maroudas,et al.  Topographical Variation of Glycosaminoglycan Content in Normal and Fibrillated Tissue , 2022 .

[24]  R. Bank,et al.  Age-related accumulation of the advanced glycation endproduct pentosidine in human articular cartilage aggrecan: the use of pentosidine levels as a quantitative measure of protein turnover. , 2001, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[25]  G. Murrell,et al.  The accuracy and reliability of a novel handheld dynamic indentation probe for analysing articular cartilage. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[26]  Simo Saarakkala,et al.  Ultrasound indentation of bovine knee articular cartilage in situ. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Degenerative Joint Disease , 1943 .

[28]  J. Bland,et al.  Osteoarthritis: a review of the cell biology involved and evidence for reversibility. Management rationally related to known genesis and pathophysiology. , 1984, Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism.

[29]  W Herzog,et al.  Articular cartilage biomechanics: theoretical models, material properties, and biosynthetic response. , 1999, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[30]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Topographical variation of glycosaminoglycan content and cartilage thickness in canine knee (stifle) joint cartilage. Application of the microspectrophotometric method. , 1987, Journal of anatomy.

[31]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Spatial assessment of articular cartilage proteoglycans with Gd‐DTPA‐enhanced T1 imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[32]  P. Babyn,et al.  Imaging of immature articular cartilage using ultrasound backscatter microscopy at 50 MHz , 1995, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[33]  Juha Töyräs,et al.  Ultrasound attenuation in normal and spontaneously degenerated articular cartilage. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.