The transition towards benefit corporations: What are the roles for stakeholders?

A benefit corporation (BC) is the legal status of an enterprise that embraces a dual‐purpose business model (BM) of maximising shareholder value while satisfying stakeholders' interests. The literature so far has focussed on the motivations beyond the birth or transformation of BC, the factors that can favour the emergence of BCs, and the results companies achieve after the transformation, as well as studies on the new BCs' legislation. Other studies have examined how the duality of purpose (profit vs. social benefits) can be composed, and the risks of a mission drift favouring profit maximisation in BCs. By drawing on stakeholder theory, this study aims to highlight the role of stakeholders in the process of transformation from a traditional for‐profit BM to a BC model. We adopt a qualitative approach through a longitudinal case study to observe the transition of a small‐medium enterprise into a BC. The results show how management and engagement practices coexist in the relationships with stakeholders and how an instrumental approach prevails.

[1]  Giovanna Michelon,et al.  A governance approach to stakeholder engagement in sustainable enterprises—Evidence from B Corps , 2023, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[2]  Pier Luigi Marchini,et al.  Pursuing a strategy of ‘common benefit’ in business: The adoption of the benefit corporation model in Italy , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[3]  Maria Rosa De Giacomo,et al.  The environmental performance of UK‐based B Corp companies: An analysis based on the triple bottom line approach , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[4]  P. Dahlin,et al.  The impact of B Corp certification on financial stability: Evidence from a multi‐country sample , 2021, Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility.

[5]  S. Sedita,et al.  Mapping the emergence of a new organisational form: An exploration of the intellectual structure of the B Corp research , 2021, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.

[6]  Luis Ferruz Agudo,et al.  Fintech and Sustainability: Do They Affect Each Other? , 2021, Sustainability.

[7]  R. Freeman,et al.  The Relationship between Stakeholder Theory and Corporate Social Responsibility: Differences, Similarities, and Implications for Social Issues in Management , 2021 .

[8]  Jonathan M. Roberts,et al.  Hands, Hearts and Hybrids: Economic Organization, Individual Motivation and Public Benefit , 2021 .

[9]  L. Sanchez-Ruiz,et al.  The B Corp Movement: A Systematic Literature Review , 2021, Sustainability.

[10]  Peter W. Moroz,et al.  Measuring the Integration of Social and Environmental Missions in Hybrid Organizations , 2020, Journal of Business Ethics.

[11]  Thierry Burger-Helmchen,et al.  Some thoughts On CSR in relation to B Corp Labels , 2020 .

[12]  C. Tilt,et al.  Motivations and impacts of sustainability reporting in the Indo‐Pacific region: Normative and instrumental stakeholder approaches , 2020 .

[13]  Gianluca Riolfo The New Italian Benefit Corporation , 2020, European Business Organization Law Review.

[14]  J. Dillard,et al.  The emergence of benefit corporations: A cautionary tale , 2020 .

[15]  Christine Legner,et al.  Business model tools at the boundary: exploring communities of practice and knowledge boundaries in business model innovation , 2020, Electron. Mark..

[16]  Sérgio Bulgacov,et al.  B Corp Certification and Its Impact on Organizations Over Time , 2019, Journal of Business Ethics.

[17]  A. Richardson,et al.  B Corporation Certification Advantages? , 2019, Business and Professional Ethics Journal.

[18]  Mara Del Baldo Acting as a benefit corporation and a B Corp to responsibly pursue private and public benefits. The case of Paradisi Srl (Italy) , 2019, International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility.

[19]  Peter W. Moroz,et al.  The Impact of B Lab Certification on Firm Growth , 2019, Academy of Management Discoveries.

[20]  A. Colantoni,et al.  The Stakeholders’ Perspective within the B Corp Certification for a Circular Approach , 2019, Sustainability.

[21]  Birte Freudenreich,et al.  A Stakeholder Theory Perspective on Business Models: Value Creation for Sustainability , 2019, Journal of Business Ethics.

[22]  T. Jones,et al.  How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage , 2018, Academy of Management Review.

[23]  G. Metternicht,et al.  Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries , 2018, Sustainability Science.

[24]  M. Halme,et al.  When Is There a Sustainability Case for CSR? Pathways to Environmental and Social Performance Improvements , 2018 .

[25]  Scott J. Shackelford,et al.  The Firm and Common Pool Resource Theory: Understanding the Rise of Benefit Corporations , 2018 .

[26]  Samantha Miles,et al.  Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions , 2017 .

[27]  Elisabete A. Silva,et al.  Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models , 2017 .

[28]  Richard H Jonsen Other-constituency theories and firm governance: is the benefit corporation sufficient? , 2016 .

[29]  Michelle J. Stecker Awash in a Sea of Confusion: Benefit Corporations, Social Enterprise, and the Fear of “Greenwashing” , 2016 .

[30]  B. Helmig,et al.  Under Positive Pressure , 2016 .

[31]  Jill R. Kickul,et al.  Hybrid Organizations: Origins, Strategies, Impacts, and Implications , 2015 .

[32]  A. Crane,et al.  Benefit Corporation Legislation and the Emergence of a Social Hybrid Category , 2015 .

[33]  A. Hoffman,et al.  The New Heretics , 2014 .

[34]  Fergus Lyon,et al.  Beyond green niches? Growth strategies of environmentally-motivated social enterprises , 2014 .

[35]  J. Hiller The Benefit Corporation and Corporate Social Responsibility , 2013 .

[36]  S. Sen,et al.  The Relevance of Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital Theory in the Context of CSR in SMEs: An Australian Perspective , 2013 .

[37]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[38]  Giacomo Manetti,et al.  The Role of Stakeholders in Sustainability Reporting Assurance , 2012 .

[39]  S. Mansouri,et al.  Stakeholder engagement: Defining strategic advantage for sustainable construction , 2011 .

[40]  D. Holt Where are they now? Tracking the longitudinal evolution of environmental businesses from the 1990s , 2011 .

[41]  J. Battilana,et al.  BUILDING SUSTAINABLE HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS: THE CASE OF COMMERCIAL MICROFINANCE ORGANIZATIONS , 2010 .

[42]  Kirsten E. Martin,et al.  Stakeholder Capitalism , 2009 .

[43]  Thomas Donaldson,et al.  Dialogue: Toward Superior Stakeholder Theory , 2008, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[44]  L. Foo Stakeholder engagement in emerging economies: considering the strategic benefits of stakeholder management in a cross‐cultural and geopolitical context , 2007 .

[45]  Antonio Tencati,et al.  Sustainability and Stakeholder Management: the Need for New Corporate Performance Evaluation and Reporting Systems , 2006 .

[46]  David R. Hekman,et al.  Stakeholder Theory and Managerial Decision-Making: Constraints and Implications of Balancing Stakeholder Interests , 2006 .

[47]  A. Wicks,et al.  Convergent Stakeholder Theory , 1999 .

[48]  R. Phillips Stakeholder Theory and A Principle of Fairness , 1997, Business Ethics Quarterly.

[49]  M. Porter,et al.  Creating Shared Value , 2019 .

[50]  R. Freeman,et al.  Stakeholder Engagement: Clinical Research Cases , 2017 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Wilburn,et al.  The double bottom line: Profit and social benefit , 2014 .

[52]  William R. Forster,et al.  CSR and Stakeholder Theory: A Tale of Adam Smith , 2013 .

[53]  Reinhard Steurer,et al.  Mapping Stakeholder Theory Anew: From the Stakeholder Theory of the Firm to Three Perspectives on Business-Society Relations , 2006 .

[54]  L. Preston,et al.  The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications , 1995 .

[55]  Toby Diane Ayers,et al.  Stakeholders as partners in evaluation: A stakeholder-collaborative approach☆☆☆ , 1987 .