Molecular and social regulation of worker division of labour in fire ants

Reproductive and worker division of labour (DOL) is a hallmark of social insect societies. Despite a long‐standing interest in worker DOL, the molecular mechanisms regulating this process have only been investigated in detail in honey bees, and little is known about the regulatory mechanisms operating in other social insects. In the fire ant Solenopsis invicta, one of the most studied ant species, workers are permanently sterile and the tasks performed are modulated by the worker's internal state (age and size) and the outside environment (social environment), which potentially includes the effect of the queen presence through chemical communication via pheromones. However, the molecular mechanisms underpinning these processes are unknown. Using a whole‐genome microarray platform, we characterized the molecular basis for worker DOL and we explored how a drastic change in the social environment (i.e. the sudden loss of the queen) affects global gene expression patterns of worker ants. We identified numerous genes differentially expressed between foraging and nonforaging workers in queenright colonies. With a few exceptions, these genes appear to be distinct from those involved in DOL in bees and wasps. Interestingly, after the queen was removed, foraging workers were no longer distinct from nonforaging workers at the transcriptomic level. Furthermore, few expression differences were detected between queenright and queenless workers when we did not consider the task performed. Thus, the social condition of the colony (queenless vs. queenright) appears to impact the molecular pathways underlying worker task performance, providing strong evidence for social regulation of DOL in S. invicta.

[1]  Henry S. Pollock,et al.  Insulin signaling is involved in the regulation of worker division of labor in honey bee colonies , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  T. Pankiw,et al.  Genotype and colony environment affect honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) development and foraging behavior , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[3]  L. Keller,et al.  Sociogenomics of Cooperation and Conflict during Colony Founding in the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  L. Keller,et al.  Venom Alkaloid and Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profiles Are Associated with Social Organization, Queen Fertility Status, and Queen Genotype in the Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta , 2011, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[6]  G. Robinson Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. , 1992, Annual review of entomology.

[7]  S. Vinson,et al.  Division of labour and specification of castes in the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta buren , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Insect hydrocarbons : biology, biochemistry, and chemical ecology , 2010 .

[9]  Mark L. Winston,et al.  The effect of queen pheromones on worker honey bee ovary development , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[10]  T. Wyatt Pheromones and Animal Behaviour: Communication by Smell and Taste , 2003 .

[11]  G. Robinson,et al.  Queen mandibular gland pheromone influences worker honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) foraging ontogeny and juvenile hormone titers. , 1998, Journal of insect physiology.

[12]  W. Tschinkel,et al.  Social control of egg‐laying rate in queens of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta* , 1988 .

[13]  E. Vargo Mutual pheromonal inhibition among queens in polygyne colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  L. Keller,et al.  The genome of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Sokolowski,et al.  Molecular basis for changes in behavioral state in ant social behaviors , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  Paul C. Leyland,et al.  FlyBase: improvements to the bibliography , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[17]  Matthew E Hudson,et al.  Wasp Gene Expression Supports an Evolutionary Link Between Maternal Behavior and Eusociality , 2007, Science.

[18]  A. Crespi,et al.  Tracking Individuals Shows Spatial Fidelity Is a Key Regulator of Ant Social Organization , 2013, Science.

[19]  M. B. Manser Response of foraging group members to sentinel calls in suricates, Suricata suricatta , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  L. Keller,et al.  An Evolutionary Perspective on Self-Organized Division of Labor in Social Insects , 2011 .

[21]  Matthew E. Hudson,et al.  associated with behaviour across social insect lineages Brain transcriptomic analysis in paper wasps identifies genes , 2010 .

[22]  R. Connor,et al.  A division of labour with role specialization in group–hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key, Florida , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[23]  M. Blum,et al.  Pheromonal control of dealation and oogenesis in virgin queen fire ants. , 1981, Science.

[24]  Brian R Johnson,et al.  Deconstructing the Superorganism: Social Physiology, Groundplans, and Sociogenomics , 2010, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[25]  Leonard J. Foster,et al.  Mechanisms of stable lipid loss in a social insect , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[26]  G. Robinson,et al.  Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[27]  R. Deslippe,et al.  A queen pheromone induces workers to kill sexual larvae in colonies of the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) , 2002, Naturwissenschaften.

[28]  E. Vargo,et al.  Evidence of pheromonal queen control over the production of male and female sexuals in the fire ant,Solenopsis invicta , 1986, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  G. Allen,et al.  A SURVEY FOR PATHOGENS OF FIRE ANTS, SOLENOPSIS SPP.,' IN THE SOUTHEASTERN UNITED STATES , 1977 .

[30]  W. Jordan,et al.  Differential gene expression and phenotypic plasticity in behavioural castes of the primitively eusocial wasp, Polistes canadensis , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  C. S. Lofgren,et al.  The poison sac of red imported fire ant queens: source of a pheromone attractant. , 1980 .

[32]  Mark L. Winston,et al.  Pheromone Communication in the Honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[33]  M. Winston,et al.  Pheromone Communication in Social Insects , 1997 .

[34]  E. Plettner,et al.  Larval salivary glands are a source of primer and releaser pheromone in honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) , 2006, Naturwissenschaften.

[35]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[36]  R. V. Vander Meer,et al.  Queen primer pheromone affects conspecific fire ant (Solenopsis invicta) aggression , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[37]  G. Robinson,et al.  Regulation of brain gene expression in honey bees by brood pheromone , 2009, Genes, brain, and behavior.

[38]  M. Fondrk,et al.  Regulation of pollen foraging in honeybee colonies: effects of young brood, stored pollen, and empty space , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[39]  L. Keller,et al.  Changes in reproductive roles are associated with changes in gene expression in fire ant queens , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[40]  G. Amdam,et al.  Genetics of reproduction and regulation of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) social behavior. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[41]  M. Bulmer Worker-queen conflict in annual social hymenoptera , 1981 .

[42]  G. Robinson,et al.  Genetic and genomic analyses of the division of labour in insect societies , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[43]  G. Amdam,et al.  Reproductive ground plan may mediate colony-level selection effects on individual foraging behavior in honey bees. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Walter R. Tschinkel,et al.  The Fire Ants , 2006 .

[45]  E. Vargo,et al.  Effect of queen number on the production of sexuals in natural populations of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta , 1987 .

[46]  John Quackenbush,et al.  Genesis: cluster analysis of microarray data , 2002, Bioinform..

[47]  G. Robinson,et al.  Gene Expression Profiles in the Brain Predict Behavior in Individual Honey Bees , 2003, Science.

[48]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[49]  E. Vargo,et al.  Queen number and the production of sexuals in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[50]  L. Keller,et al.  A Y-like social chromosome causes alternative colony organization in fire ants , 2013, Nature.

[51]  Julia Krüger,et al.  Influence of Gene Action Across Different Time Scales on Behavior , 2002, Science.

[52]  I. Owens,et al.  Division of labour within cooperatively breeding groups , 2005 .

[53]  Gene E Robinson,et al.  Pheromone-mediated gene expression in the honey bee brain , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  M. Winston,et al.  New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  T. Cox,et al.  Uveitis in the southeastern United States. , 1997, Current eye research.

[56]  Laurent Keller,et al.  Ant genomics sheds light on the molecular regulation of social organization , 2013, Genome Biology.

[57]  L. Keller,et al.  Vitellogenin Underwent Subfunctionalization to Acquire Caste and Behavioral Specific Expression in the Harvester Ant Pogonomyrmex barbatus , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[58]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[59]  Brad T. Sherman,et al.  Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists , 2008, Nucleic acids research.