Addressing Transparency, Communication and Participation in Enterprise 2.0 Projects

Enterprise 2.0 based projects offer great potential for flexible, loosely-coupled integration and ad-hoc information exchange. To increase the probability to succeed in such projects, transparency, communication and participation need to be addressed by the resulting Enterprise 2.0 tools. By presenting an integrated project methodology, the authors bridge the gap between existing scientific models and requirements for Enterprise 2.0 projects. The contribution of the paper is to explain and reflect the performed methodology as well as activities and selected key results from two pilot projects and to match the results with the main success factors which were derived from literature. With it, it provides elaborative insights into key features of Enterprise 2.0 platforms and project management.

[1]  A. Richter,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen , 2009 .

[2]  Milena M. Head,et al.  Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach , 2009 .

[3]  C. Edwards,et al.  Executing Strategic Change: Understanding the Critical Management Elements That Lead to Success , 2009 .

[4]  Diana Gosálvez Prados,et al.  Six ways to make Web 2.0 work , 2009 .

[5]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model , 2000, Inf. Syst. Res..

[6]  Ansgar Bernardi,et al.  Organisational Knowledge Management Systems in the Era of Enterprise 2.0: The case of OrganiK , 2008, BIS.

[7]  J. M. Cerezo,et al.  Web 2.0 , 2010 .

[8]  Margit E. Oswald.  Vertrauen in Organisationen , 2010 .

[9]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Towards a process model of information systems implementation: the case of customer relationship management (CRM) , 2006, DATB.

[10]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: New Collaborative Tools for Your Organization's Toughest Challenges , 2009 .

[11]  Peng Xu,et al.  Improving the change-management process , 2008, CACM.

[12]  Chuni Wu,et al.  Knowledge creation in a supply chain , 2008 .

[13]  Thomas Gulledge,et al.  The evolution of SAP implementation environments: A case study from a complex public sector project , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[14]  M. Thüring,et al.  Usability, aesthetics and emotions in human–technology interaction , 2007 .

[15]  H. Wache,et al.  WM2009: 5th Conference on Professional Knowledge Management. , 2009 .

[16]  Stanley E. Fawcett,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN TRUST IS WITHIN YOUR GRASP , 2004 .

[17]  Markus Biehl,et al.  Success factors for implementing global information systems , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[18]  Fernando Belfo,et al.  People, Organizational and Technological Dimensions of Software Requirements Specification , 2012 .

[19]  Brad L. Neiger,et al.  A Multidirectional Communication Model: Implications for Social Marketing Practice , 2009, Health promotion practice.

[20]  Andrew McAfee,et al.  Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[21]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  Project Management for the Creation of Organisational Value , 2011 .

[22]  Tom Alby,et al.  Web 2.0: Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien , 2008 .

[23]  Rainer Alt,et al.  Virtuelle Organisation - Konzept, Realität und Umsetzung , 2005, HMD Prax. Wirtsch..

[24]  H. Chesbrough.  Open Business Models: How to Thrive in the New Innovation Landscape , 2006 .

[25]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Virtual supply-chain management , 2004 .

[26]  Alan Jackson,et al.  The hard side of change management , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[27]  Natalia Kryvinska,et al.  Enterprise 2.0 Integrated Communication and Collaboration Platform: A Conceptual Viewpoint , 2012, 2012 26th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops.