Backstepping Control of the Toroidal Plasma Current Profile in the DIII-D Tokamak

One of the most promising devices for realizing power production through nuclear fusion is the tokamak. To maximize performance, it is preferable that tokamak reactors achieve advanced operating scenarios characterized by good plasma confinement, improved magnetohydrodynamic stability, and a largely noninductively driven plasma current. Such scenarios could enable steady-state reactor operation with high fusion gain, the ratio of produced fusion power to the external power provided through the plasma boundary. For certain advanced scenarios, control of the spatial profile of the plasma current will be essential. The complexity of the current profile dynamics, arising due to nonlinearities and couplings with many other plasma parameters, motivates the use of model-based control algorithms that can account for the system dynamics. A first-principles-driven, control-oriented model of the current profile evolution in low-confinement mode (L-mode) discharges in the DIII-D tokamak is employed to address the problem of regulating the current profile evolution around desired trajectories. In the primarily inductive L-mode discharges considered in this paper, the boundary condition, which is dependent on the total plasma current, has the largest influence on the current profile dynamics, motivating the design of a boundary feedback control law to improve the system performance. The backstepping control design technique provides a systematic method to obtain a boundary feedback law through the transformation of a spatially discretized version of the original system into an asymptotically stable target system with desirable properties. Through a nonlinear transformation of the available physical actuators, the resulting control scheme produces references for the total plasma current, total power, and line averaged density, which are tracked by existing dedicated control loops. Adaptiveness is added to the control scheme to improve upon the backstepping controller's disturbance rejection and tracking capability. Prior to experimental testing, a Simserver simulation was carried out to study the controller's performance and ensure proper implementation in the DIII-D Plasma Control System. An experimental test was performed on DIII-D to test the ability of the controller to reject input disturbances and perturbations in initial conditions and to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed control approach.

[1]  Didier Mazon,et al.  Feedback control of the safety factor profile evolution during formation of an advanced tokamak discharge , 2006 .

[2]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Simserver simulation of a model-based current profile controller in the DIII-D Plasma Control System , 2011 .

[3]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Control of a non-linear PDE system arising from non-burning tokamak plasma transport dynamics , 2003 .

[4]  O. Naito,et al.  Off-axis current drive and real-time control of current profile in JT-60U , 2008 .

[5]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Backstepping in Infinite Dimension for a Class of Parabolic Distributed Parameter Systems , 2003, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[6]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Receding-horizon optimal control of the current profile evolution during the ramp-up phase of a tokamak discharge , 2011 .

[7]  Christophe Prieur,et al.  D1-Input-to-state stability of a time-varying nonhomogeneous diffusive equation subject to boundary disturbances , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[8]  S. H. Kim,et al.  A potentially robust plasma profile control approach for ITER using real-time estimation of linearized profile response models , 2012 .

[9]  P. C. de Vries,et al.  Real-time control of the q-profile in JET for steady state advanced tokamak operation , 2003 .

[10]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Backstepping control of density and energy profiles in a burning tokamak plasma , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[11]  Didier Mazon,et al.  Feedback control of the lower hybrid power deposition profile on Tore Supra , 2007 .

[12]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Optimal Tracking Control of Current Profile in Tokamaks , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[13]  Jacques Blum Numerical simulation and optimal control in plasma physics : with applications to Tokamaks , 1989 .

[14]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Sequential linear quadratic control of bilinear parabolic PDEs based on POD model reduction , 2011, Autom..

[15]  Didier Georges,et al.  Model-based control of the magnetic flux profile in a Tokamak plasma , 2010, 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[16]  M. Walker,et al.  Design and simulation of extremum-seeking open-loop optimal control of current profile in the DIII-D tokamak , 2008 .

[17]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control , 1998 .

[18]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Backstepping control of chemical tubular reactors , 2002 .

[19]  Jet Efda Contributors,et al.  A two-time-scale dynamic-model approach for magnetic and kinetic profile control in advanced tokamak scenarios on JET , 2008 .

[20]  B. G. Penaflor,et al.  Enhancements in the second generation DIII-D digital plasma control system , 2007 .

[21]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Towards model-based current profile control at DIII-D , 2007 .

[22]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  First-principles-driven model-based current profile control for the DIII-D tokamak via LQI optimal control , 2013 .

[23]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Toroidal current profile control during low confinement mode plasma discharges in DIII-D via first-principles-driven model-based robust control synthesis , 2012 .

[24]  T. Osborne,et al.  Emerging Applications in Tokamak Plasma Control Emerging Applications in Tokamak Plasma Control CONTROL SOLUTIONS FOR NEXT-GENERATION TOKAMAKS , 2006 .

[25]  Yongsheng Ou,et al.  Robust Control Design for the Poloidal Magnetic Flux Profile Evolution in the Presence of Model Uncertainties , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[26]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Advances in integrated plasma control on DIII-D , 2007 .

[27]  X. Litaudon,et al.  Feedback control of the current profile on Tore Supra , 1997 .

[28]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Multivariable robust control of the plasma rotational transform profile for advanced tokamak scenarios in DIII-D , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[29]  E. Joffrin,et al.  A control-oriented model of the current profile in tokamak plasma , 2007 .

[30]  M. Krstić,et al.  Boundary Control of PDEs , 2008 .

[31]  E. Schuster,et al.  Ramp-Up-Phase Current-Profile Control of Tokamak Plasmas via Nonlinear Programming , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[32]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Stabilization of a solid propellant rocket instability by state feedback , 2003 .

[33]  F. Hinton,et al.  Theory of plasma transport in toroidal confinement systems , 1976 .

[34]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Burn control in fusion reactors using simultaneous boundary and distributed actuation , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[35]  Eugenio Schuster,et al.  Optimal feedback control of the poloidal magnetic flux profile in the DIII-D tokamak based on identified plasma response models , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[36]  Robert James Goldston Energy confinement scaling in Tokamaks: some implications of recent experiments with Ohmic and strong auxiliary heating , 1984 .

[37]  F. Felici,et al.  Real-time physics-model-based simulation of the current density profile in tokamak plasmas , 2011 .

[38]  M. Sueoka,et al.  Recent RF Experiments and Application of RF Waves to Real-Time Control of Safety Factor Profile in JT-60U , 2005 .

[39]  A. Pironti,et al.  Fusion, tokamaks, and plasma control: an introduction and tutorial , 2005, IEEE Control Systems.

[40]  P. Politzer,et al.  Power threshold for neutral beam current drive , 1990 .

[41]  Experts,et al.  Integrated magnetic and kinetic control of advanced tokamak plasmas on DIII-D based on data-driven models , 2013 .

[42]  Yury Orlov,et al.  Sliding mode stabilization of the current profile in Tokamak plasmas , 2011, IEEE Conference on Decision and Control and European Control Conference.

[43]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Progress toward fully noninductive, high beta conditions in DIII-D , 2005 .

[44]  Marriott Waterfront Simultaneous Control of Effective Atomic Number and Electron Density in Non-Burning Tokamak Plasmas , 2010 .

[45]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A model-based technique for integrated real-time profile control in the JET tokamak , 2004 .