Rapid movements with reversals in direction. II. Control of movement amplitude and inertial load.

Transformations of the underlying movement control of rapid sequential (reversal) responses were examined as the movement amplitude (Experiment 1) and moment of inertia (Experiment 2) were altered, with constant movement time. Increases in amplitude and inertia were both met by sharply increased joint torques with a constant temporal structure, suggesting that the alterations may have been governed by a single gain parameter. The durations of various EMG bursts were essentially constant across changes in inertia, supporting a model in which the output of a fixed temporal representation is amplified to alter joint torques. The EMG amplitudes increased greatly with both amplitude and load. However, the fact that the EMG durations increased systematically with increases in distance provided difficulties for this model of amplitude control. The data suggest an economy in motor control in simple agravitational movements, whereby relatively simple transformations of an underlying representation can accommodate large changes in movement amplitude and moment of inertia.

[1]  Merton Pa.  How we control the contraction of our muscles. , 1972 .

[2]  James G Hay,et al.  The biomechanics of sports techniques , 1973 .

[3]  M. Raibert.  Motor Control and Learning by the State Space Model , 1977 .

[4]  D. Vicario,et al.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments , 1978, Experimental brain research.

[5]  M. Hallett,et al.  Ballistic flexion movements of the human thumb. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[6]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. , 1979, Psychological review.

[7]  K. Newell,et al.  Velocity as a factor in movement timing accuracy. , 1980, Journal of motor behavior.

[8]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  An impulse-timing theory for reciprocal control of muscular activity in rapid, discrete movements. , 1981, Journal of motor behavior.

[9]  J. Cooke,et al.  Amplitude‐ and instruction‐dependent modulation of movement‐related electromyogram activity in humans. , 1981, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  D. Meyer,et al.  Models for the speed and accuracy of aimed movements. , 1982, Psychological review.

[11]  S. A. Wallace,et al.  Distance and movement time effects on the timing of agonist and antagonist muscles: a test of the impulse-timing theory. , 1982, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  C. Marsden,et al.  Duration of the first agonist EMG burst in ballistic arm movements , 1984, Brain Research.

[13]  D. C. Shapiro,et al.  Control of sequential movements: evidence for generalized motor programs. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Charles B. Walter,et al.  Temporal quantification of electromyography with reference to motor control research , 1984 .

[15]  D. E. Sherwood,et al.  Speed-Accuracy Trade-offs in Motor Behavior: Theories of Impulse Variability , 1985 .

[16]  C. Gielen,et al.  Relation between EMG activation patterns and kinematic properties of aimed arm movements. , 1985, Journal of motor behavior.

[17]  H. Zelaznik,et al.  Kinematics properties of rapid aimed hand movements. , 1986, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  D. Gentner.  Timing of Skilled Motor Performance: Tests of the Proportional Duration Model. , 1987 .

[19]  J. D. Cooke,et al.  Initial agonist burst duration changes with movement amplitude in a deafferented patient , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  F. Lestienne.  Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  B. Conrad,et al.  Rapid goal-directed elbow flexion movements: limitations of the speed control system due to neural constraints , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.