Design and operation of a low-cost and compact autonomous buoy system for use in coastal aquaculture and water quality monitoring

The need to ensure future food security and issues of varying estuarine water quality is driving the expansion of aquaculture into near-shore coastal waters. It is prudent to fully evaluate new or proposed aquaculture sites, prior to any substantial financial investment in infrastructure and staffing. Measurements of water temperature, salinity and dissolved oxygen can be used to gain insight into the physical, chemical and biological water quality conditions within a farm site, towards identifying its suitability for farming, both for the stock species of interest and for assessing the potential risk from harmful or toxic algae. The latter can cause closure of shellfish harvesting. Unfortunately, commercial scientific monitoring systems can be cost prohibitive for small organisations and companies to purchase and operate. Here we describe the design, construction and deployment of a low cost (<£ 5000) monitoring buoy suitable for use within a near-shore aquaculture farm or bathing waters. The mooring includes a suite of sensors designed for supporting and understanding variations in near-shore physical, chemical and biological water quality. The system has been designed so that it can be operated and maintained by non-scientific staff, whilst still providing good quality scientific data. Data collected from two deployments totalling 14 months, one in a coastal bay location, another in an estuary, have illustrated the robust design and provided insight into the suitability of these sites for aquaculture and the potential occurrence of a toxin causing algae (Dinophysis spp.). The instruments maintained good accuracy during the deployments when compared to independent in situ measurements (e.g. RMSE 0.13–0.16 °C, bias 0.03–0.08 °C) enabling stratification and biological features to be identified, along with confirming that the waters were suitable for mussel (Mytilus spp.) and lobster (Homarus gammarus) aquaculture, whilst sites showed conditions agreeable for Dinophysis spp.

[1]  M. Witt,et al.  Have Centuries of Inefficient Fishing Sustained a Wild Oyster Fishery: a Case Study , 2017 .

[2]  Tommy D. Dickey,et al.  Methods for Reducing Biofouling of Moored Optical Sensors , 2004 .

[3]  A. Herbland,et al.  Environmental conditions which lead to increase in cell density of the toxic dinoflagellates Dinophysis spp. in nutrient-rich and nutrient-poor waters of the French Atlantic coast , 1992 .

[4]  R. Feely,et al.  The Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, shows negative correlation to naturally elevated carbon dioxide levels: Implications for near‐term ocean acidification effects , 2012 .

[5]  Robert J. W. Brewin,et al.  On the Potential of Surfers to Monitor Environmental Indicators in the Coastal Zone , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  R. Raine,et al.  Physical dynamics on the continental shelf off southwestern Ireland and their influence on coastal phytoplankton blooms , 1998 .

[7]  B. Reguera,et al.  Scales characterising a high density thin layer of Dinophysis acuta Ehrenberg and its transport within a coastal jet , 2012 .

[8]  Karline Soetaert,et al.  marelac : Tools for Aquatic Sciences , 2010 .

[9]  Ken Collins,et al.  Seasonal changes in the level and diel pattern of activity in the European lobster Homarus gammarus , 1999 .

[10]  B. Reguera,et al.  Harmful Dinophysis species: A review , 2012 .

[11]  D. Schoeman,et al.  Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review , 2009 .

[12]  M. Best,et al.  Dissolved oxygen as a physico-chemical supporting element in the Water Framework Directive. , 2007, Marine pollution bulletin.

[13]  Susan C. Fitzer,et al.  Ocean acidification impacts mussel control on biomineralisation , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[14]  R. Rosenberg,et al.  Effects of oxygen depletion on the ecology, blood physiology and fishery of the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus (L.) , 1990 .

[15]  S. O’Boyle,et al.  Dissolved oxygen levels in estuarine and coastal waters around Ireland. , 2009, Marine pollution bulletin.

[16]  A. Kharazova,et al.  Mechanisms of salinity adaptations in marine molluscs , 1997, Hydrobiologia.

[17]  R. Neves.  Bivalve Molluscs: Biology, Ecology, and Culture , 2004 .

[18]  J. Burkholder,et al.  Real-time remote monitoring of water quality: a review of current applications, and advancements in sensor, telemetry, and computing technologies , 2004 .

[19]  J. M. Newcomb,et al.  Detection of Salinity by the Lobster, Homarus americanus , 2001, The Biological Bulletin.

[20]  A. Godhe,et al.  Oceanographic settings explain fluctuations in Dinophysis spp. and concentrations of diarrhetic shellfish toxin in the plankton community within a mussel farm area on the Swedish west coast , 2002 .

[21]  T. Smyth,et al.  A broad spatio-temporal view of the western English Channel observatory , 2010 .