Application of knowledge for automated land cover change monitoring

This paper outlines an approach for updating baseline land cover datasets. Knowledge about land cover, as used during manual mapping, is combined with simple remote sensing analyses to determine land cover change direction. The philosophy is to treat reflectance data as one source of information about land cover features. Applying expert knowledge with reflectance and biogeographical data allows generic solutions to the problem. The approach is demonstrated in areas of semi-natural vegetation and shown to differentiate ecologically subtle but spectrally similar land cover classes. Further, the advantages of manual mapping techniques and of high resolution remotely sensed imagery are combined. This approach is suitable for incorporation into automated approaches: it makes no assumption about the distribution of land cover features, can be applied to different remotely sensed data and is not classification specific. It has been incorporated into SYMOLAC, an expert system for monitoring land cover change.

[1]  P. Holmgren,et al.  Satellite remote sensing for forestry planning—A review , 1998 .

[2]  Michel M. Verstraete,et al.  Potential and limitations of information extraction on the terrestrial biosphere from satellite remote sensing , 1996 .

[3]  G. G. Wright,et al.  Landsat TM spectral information to enhance the land cover of Scotland 1988 dataset , 1997 .

[4]  R. Congalton,et al.  A Quantitative Comparison of Change-Detection Algorithms for Monitoring Eelgrass from Remotely Sensed Data , 1998 .

[5]  J. C. Taylor,et al.  Monitoring landscape change in the National Parks of England and Wales using aerial photo interpretation and GIS , 2000 .

[6]  J. Mas.  Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques , 1999 .

[7]  A. N. R. Law,et al.  A system for monitoring land cover , 2003 .

[8]  J. C. Taylor,et al.  Mapping National Park landscape from ground, air and space , 2000 .

[9]  G. Hudson,et al.  Climatic soil moisture deficit - climate and soil data integration in a GIS , 1994 .

[10]  G. Foody,et al.  Classification of tropical forest classes from Landsat TM data. , 1996 .

[11]  P. Fisher.  The pixel: A snare and a delusion , 1997 .

[12]  K. Green,et al.  Using remote sensing to detect and monitor land-cover and land-use change , 1994 .

[13]  Marvin E. Bauer,et al.  Integrating Contextual Information with per-Pixel Classification for Improved Land Cover Classification , 2000 .

[14]  D. P. Paine,et al.  Aerial Photography and Image Interpretation for Resource Management , 1981 .

[15]  R. Lunetta,et al.  A change detection experiment using vegetation indices. , 1998 .

[16]  A. S. Belward,et al.  An unsupervised approach to the classification of semi-natural vegetation from Landsat Thematic Mapper data. A pilot study on Islay , 1990 .

[17]  The Macaulay Institute for Soil Research , 1932, Nature.

[18]  Ruth Weaver.  Spectral separation of moorland vegetation in airborne Thematic Mapper data , 1987 .

[19]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[20]  N. M. Mattikalli.  Integration of remotely-sensed raster data with a vector-based geographical information system for land-use change detection , 1995 .

[21]  Alexis J. Comber,et al.  A comparison of Bayes', Dempster-Shafer and Endorsement theories for managing knowledge uncertainty in the context of land cover monitoring , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[22]  John R. G. Townshend,et al.  Advances in classification for land cover mapping using SPOT HRV imagery , 1991 .