Transnational Models for Regulation of Nanotechnology

There is much we do not know about nanotechnology. Despite its tremendous promise, nanotechnology today is mostly forecast and fervent hope. Predictions that spending on nanotechnology will increase from current levels of $13 billion to more than $1 trillion by 2015 are no more than that – simply predictions. Hopes that nanotechnology will be an essential part of solving the globe's energy, food, and water problems should be tempered by recalling a century of revolutionary technologies that failed to live up to their early promise such as nuclear energy, supersonic airplanes, or gene therapy. Many other questions continue to nip at nanotechnology's heels, not the least of which are debates about what is and is not technically feasible. Despite these uncertainties, we can have complete confidence in one aspect of nanotechnology's future – it will be subject to a host of regulations.

[1]  Jürgen Altmann,et al.  Anticipating military nanotechnology , 2004, IEEE Technology and Society Magazine.

[2]  Geoff Brumfiel,et al.  Nanotechnology: A little knowledge... , 2003, Nature.

[3]  Ira Bennett,et al.  Too Little, Too Late? Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States , 2006 .

[4]  John Harris,et al.  Precautionary principle stifles discovery , 1999, Nature.

[5]  W. Bainbridge,et al.  Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology , 2001 .

[6]  Joy Bill,et al.  Why the future doesn’t need us , 2003 .

[7]  Glenn Harlan Reynolds,et al.  Nanotechnology and Regulatory Policy: Three Futures , 2007 .

[8]  M. Schrope.  Consensus science, or consensus politics? , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Bernt Bull,et al.  Framework Convention on Climate Change , 1996 .

[10]  Benedick.  Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer , 1996 .

[11]  R. Pinson.  Is Nanotechnology Prohibited by the Biological and Chemical Weapons Conventions , 2004 .

[12]  C. Saladin,et al.  Precautionary Principle in International Law , 2000, International journal of occupational and environmental health.

[13]  Jürgen Altmann,et al.  Military Uses of Nanotechnology: Perspectives and Concerns , 2004 .

[14]  Unoda.  Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on their Destruction [BWC Convention], U.N. Doc. A/Res/2826; 1015 U.N.T.S. 163; 26 U.S.T. 583; 11 I.L.M. 309 (10 Apr. 1972) , 2001, International Terrorism: Multilateral Conventions (1937-2001).

[15]  Pnuma.  Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes And Their Disposal , 1994 .

[16]  J. Tucker.  The BWC new Process: A preliminary assessment , 2004 .

[17]  J. Dupuis.  Genetically modified pest-protected plants: science and regulation , 2002 .

[18]  Douglas K. Martin,et al.  Nanotechnology and the Developing World , 2005, PLoS medicine.

[19]  R. B.,et al.  The United Nations , 1947, Nature.

[20]  Fiona Proffitt,et al.  Yellow Light for Nanotech , 2004, Science.

[21]  P. Sandin.  Dimensions of the Precautionary Principle , 1999, Emerging Technologies: Ethics, Law and Governance.

[22]  M Porta,et al.  Implementing the Stockholm Treaty on Persistent Organic Pollutants , 2002, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[23]  Jeff Johnson.  AN END TO NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION , 2004 .