Finite element structural response sensitivity and reliability analyses using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models

This paper focuses on the effects upon the design point search of gradient discontinuities caused by non-smoothness of material constitutive models in the context of finite element reliability analysis. The response computation algorithm for the Menegotto-Pinto smooth material constitutive model is extended to response sensitivity analysis using the Direct Differentiation Method. Response sensitivity and reliability analysis results are compared for a structural system modelled using smooth and non-smooth material constitutive laws, respectively. Both material and discrete loading sensitivity parameters are considered. Structural reliability analyses are performed using the First-Order Reliability Method. Implications of using smooth versus non-smooth material constitutive models in finite element response, response sensitivity and reliability analyses are discussed. A sufficient condition on the smoothness of uni-axial material constitutive models for obtaining continuous finite element response sensitivities is stated and proved for the quasi-static case. The issue of continuity/discontinuity of response sensitivities for the dynamic case is discussed within the application examples.

[1]  W. Ramberg,et al.  Description of Stress-Strain Curves by Three Parameters , 1943 .

[2]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Structural reliability under combined random load sequences , 1978 .

[3]  Philip E. Gill,et al.  Practical optimization , 1981 .

[4]  K. Breitung.  Asymptotic approximations for multinormal integrals , 1984 .

[5]  R. Rackwitz,et al.  Sensitivity and importance measures in structural reliability , 1986 .

[6]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY UNDER INCOMPLETE PROBABILITY INFORMATION , 1986 .

[7]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Second-Order Reliability Approximations , 1987 .

[8]  G. Schuëller,et al.  A critical appraisal of methods to determine failure probabilities , 1987 .

[9]  Armen Der Kiureghian,et al.  The stochastic finite element method in structural reliability , 1988 .

[10]  R. Melchers.  Importance sampling in structural systems , 1989 .

[11]  Ø. Hagen,et al.  VECTOR PROCESS OUT-CROSSING AS PARALLEL SYSTEM SENSITIVITY MEASURE , 1991 .

[12]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Optimization algorithms for structural reliability , 1991 .

[13]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Optimal Importance‐Sampling Density Estimator , 1992 .

[14]  Giorgio Monti,et al.  Nonlinear Cyclic Behavior of Reinforcing Bars Including Buckling , 1992 .

[15]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Dynamic response sensitivity of inelastic structures , 1993 .

[16]  A. Der Kiureghian,et al.  Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review , 1996 .

[17]  Henrik O. Madsen,et al.  Structural Reliability Methods , 1996 .

[18]  Duong Hien Tran,et al.  Parameter Sensitivity in Nonlinear Mechanics: Theory and Finite Element Computations , 1997 .

[19]  Costas Papadimitriou,et al.  Reliability of uncertain dynamical systems with multiple design points , 1999 .

[20]  J. Beck,et al.  A new adaptive importance sampling scheme for reliability calculations , 1999 .

[21]  J. Beck,et al.  Estimation of Small Failure Probabilities in High Dimensions by Subset Simulation , 2001 .

[22]  J. Beck,et al.  First excursion probabilities for linear systems by very efficient importance sampling , 2001 .

[23]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  User’s Guide For Snopt Version 6, A Fortran Package for Large-Scale Nonlinear Programming∗ , 2002 .

[24]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[25]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  USER’S GUIDE FOR SNOPT 5.3: A FORTRAN PACKAGE FOR LARGE-SCALE NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING , 2002 .

[26]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Consistent Finite-Element Response Sensitivity Analysis , 2003 .

[27]  James L. Beck,et al.  SUBSET SIMULATION AND ITS APPLICATION TO SEISMIC RISK BASED ON DYNAMIC ANALYSIS , 2003 .

[28]  P. Franchin.  Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation , 2004 .

[29]  G. Schuëller,et al.  Chair of Engineering Mechanics Ifm-publication 2-374 a Critical Appraisal of Reliability Estimation Procedures for High Dimensions , 2022 .

[30]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Finite element response sensitivity analysis using force-based frame models , 2004 .

[31]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis: a comparison between force-based and Displacement-Based Frame Element Models , 2005 .

[32]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams with Deformable Shear Connection , 2005 .

[33]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Convergence Studies in Nonlinear Finite Element Response Sensitivity Analysis , 2007 .