Facilitation of bottom-up feature detection following rTMS-interference of the right parietal cortex

In visual search tasks the optimal strategy should utilize relevant information ignoring irrelevant one. When the information at the feature and object levels are in conflict, un-necessary processing at higher level of object shape can interfere with detection of lower level orientation feature. We explored the effects of inhibitory trains of transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on the right and left parietal cortex in healthy subjects performing two visual search tasks. One task (Task A) was characterised by an object-to-feature interference. The other task (Task B) was without such interference. We found that rTMS of the right parietal cortex significantly reduced reaction times (RTs) in Task A, where object recognition interferes with detection of orientation. This significant RT reduction was present only for the first 10 trials. Interestingly, right parietal rTMS had no effect on Task B. Moreover, rTMS of the left parietal cortex did not modify subjects' RTs in either task. Subjects' accuracy was equally affected by rTMS in both tasks over time. We suggest that inhibition of the right parietal cortex by means of rTMS facilitates feature-based visual search by inhibiting the interfering feature binding and spatial attentional processes. This allows subjects to accomplish Task A faster.

[1]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Object Orientation Agnosia: A Failure to Find the Axis? , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  The role of the angular gyrus in visual conjunction search investigated using signal detection analysis and transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Distinct causal influences of parietal versus frontal areas on human visual cortex: evidence from concurrent TMS-fMRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Elaine J. Anderson,et al.  Temporal dynamics of parietal cortex involvement in visual search , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.

[6]  Zhaoping Li.  A saliency map in primary visual cortex , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Neuronal representation of object orientation , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[9]  N. Kapur.  Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research. A critical review. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Rushworth,et al.  TMS in the parietal cortex: Updating representations for attention and action , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  Carlo Miniussi,et al.  Effects of Right Parietal Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Object Identification and Orientation Judgments , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Interference with Bottom-Up Feature Detection by Higher-Level Object Recognition , 2007, Current Biology.

[13]  A. Karni,et al.  The time course of learning a visual skill , 1993, Nature.

[14]  Sergio Della Sala,et al.  Agnosia for object orientation: Implications for theories of object recognition , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[15]  M. Rushworth,et al.  The parietal cortex in visual search: a visuomotor hypothesis. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual Selection and Posterior Parietal Cortex: Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Partial Report Analyzed by Bundesen's Theory of Visual Attention , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Z Kourtzi,et al.  Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.

[19]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[20]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  The timing of the involvement of the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex in visual search , 2008, Neuroreport.

[23]  J. Hummel,et al.  Evidence for holistic representations of ignored images and analytic representations of attended images. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  Igor Schindler,et al.  An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS , 2014 .

[25]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Visual Feature and Conjunction Searches of Equal Difficulty Engage Only Partially Overlapping Frontoparietal Networks , 2002, NeuroImage.

[26]  M. Corbetta,et al.  PET studies of parietal involvement in spatial attention: comparison of different task types. , 1994, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[27]  Carmel Mevorach,et al.  Driven to less distraction: rTMS of the right parietal cortex reduces attentional capture in visual search. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention Mechanisms in Visual SearchAn fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  John C Gore,et al.  The role of the parietal cortex in visual feature binding , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  Giacomo Koch,et al.  Focal Stimulation of the Posterior Parietal Cortex Increases the Excitability of the Ipsilateral Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  L. Chalupa,et al.  The visual neurosciences , 2004 .

[32]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  Vincent Walsh,et al.  The perceptual and functional consequences of parietal top-down modulation on the visual cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Christopher D Chambers,et al.  Parietal Stimulation Decouples Spatial and Feature-Based Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  A. Taylor,et al.  The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[37]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  J. Hummel,et al.  The role of attention in priming for left-right reflections of object images: evidence for a dual representation of object shape. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[39]  C. D. Frith,et al.  Brain Activations during Visual Search: Contributions of Search Efficiency versus Feature Binding , 2003, NeuroImage.

[40]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.