The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation

The role of color diagnosticity in object recognition and representation was assessed in three Experiments. In Experiment 1a, participants named pictured objects that were strongly associated with a particular color (e.g., pumpkin and orange). Stimuli were presented in a congruent color, incongruent color, or grayscale. Results indicated that congruent color facilitated naming time, incongruent color impeded naming time, and naming times for grayscale items were situated between the congruent and incongruent conditions. Experiment 1b replicated Experiment 1a using a verification task. Experiment 2 employed a picture rebus paradigm in which participants read sentences one word at a time that included pictures of color diagnostic objects (i.e., pictures were substituted for critical nouns). Results indicated that the “reading” times of these pictures mirrored the pattern found in Experiment 1. In Experiment 3, an attempt was made to override color diagnosticity using linguistic context (e.g., a pumpkin was described as painted green). Linguistic context did not override color diagnosticity. Collectively, the results demonstrate that color information is regularly utilized in object recognition and representation for highly color diagnostic items.

[1]  B. Rossion,et al.  Revisiting Snodgrass and Vanderwart's Object Pictorial Set: The Role of Surface Detail in Basic-Level Object Recognition , 2004, Perception.

[2]  J. Davidoff,et al.  The Role of Colour in Categorial Judgements , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[3]  G. Stratton,et al.  The sensations are not the emotion. , 1895 .

[4]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[5]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Color diagnosticity in object recognition , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  Lei Mo,et al.  Dynamic Mental Representations in Language Comprehension , 2009, Perceptual and motor skills.

[7]  M. J. Tarr,et al.  COMMENT ON: IS HUMAN OBJECT RECOGNITION BETTER DESCRIBED BY GEON STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS OR BY MULTIPLE VIEWS ? BY BARTRAM D.J. , 1995 .

[8]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Moving words: dynamic representations in language comprehension , 2004 .

[9]  W. Hayward,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence and Object Discriminability , 2000, Psychological science.

[10]  Michael J. Tarr.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural description or by multiple views , 1995 .

[11]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[12]  Daniel Kersten,et al.  Is Color an Intrinsic Property of Object Representation? , 2003, Perception.

[13]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Language Comprehenders Mentally Represent the Shapes of Objects , 2002, Psychological science.

[14]  I. Biederman,et al.  Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). , 1995 .

[15]  C B Cave,et al.  Effects of color and pattern on implicit and explicit picture memory. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  I. Biederman,et al.  Surface versus edge-based determinants of visual recognition , 1988, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  G. Legge,et al.  Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision , 1993 .

[19]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Methods for Dealing With Reaction Time Outliers , 1992 .

[20]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article THE EFFECT OF IMPLIED ORIENTATION DERIVED FROM VERBAL CONTEXT ON PICTURE RECOGNITION , 2022 .

[22]  Irving Biederman,et al.  One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.

[23]  G W Humphreys,et al.  The Effects of Surface Detail on Object Categorization and Naming , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  D. Weiskopf,et al.  The role of color in high-level vision , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  S. Grossberg,et al.  Neural dynamics of form perception: boundary completion, illusory figures, and neon color spreading. , 1985, Psychological review.

[26]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[27]  M. Potter,et al.  Pictures in sentences: understanding without words. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[28]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Some effects of color on naming and recognition of objects. , 1985 .

[29]  Lawrence W. Barsalou,et al.  Language and simulation in conceptual processing , 2008 .

[30]  DH Hubel,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  Linguistically Mediated Visual Search , 2001, Psychological science.