Clinical marginal and internal gaps of In-Ceram crowns fabricated using the GN-I system.

The marginal and internal gaps of ceramic crowns with alumina copings fabricated using a computer-aided design, computer-aided manufacturing system, were evaluated in vivo using silicone materials. Black and white silicone materials were used to record the marginal and internal gaps of 82 In-Ceram crowns before final cementation. The silicone materials were sectioned bucco-lingually and mesio-distally and viewed under a microscope to measure the thickness of the white silicone layer. Sixteen reference points were measured on each specimen. The mean marginal gaps were compared among the anterior, premolar and molar teeth, and the mean gaps at the reference points within the groups were compared by analysis of variance and the Dunnett T3 test. The mean marginal gap was 66.8 mum. There were no differences in marginal gaps among the three groups. In all the groups, the marginal gaps were the smallest, whereas the occlusal gaps were the largest. The mean marginal gaps of the In-Ceram crowns with the alumina copings fabricated using the GN-I system were within the range of clinically acceptable values.

[1]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Fit of a new pressure-sintered zirconium dioxide coping. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[2]  M. Tuntiprawon,et al.  The effect of cement thickness on the fracture strength of all-ceramic crowns. , 1995, Australian dental journal.

[3]  J. Mclean,et al.  The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique , 1971, British Dental Journal.

[4]  Bp. Isenberg,et al.  Clinical evaluation of CEREC CAD/CAM restorations emphasizing marginal integrity , 1991 .

[5]  G H Johnson,et al.  Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. , 1991, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[6]  S. Rinke,et al.  Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of conventional and copy-milled all-ceramic crowns. , 1995, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[7]  K J Anusavice,et al.  Structural reliability of alumina-, feldspar-, leucite-, mica- and zirconia-based ceramics. , 2000, Journal of dentistry.

[8]  B. Lang,et al.  Precision of fit: the Procera AllCeram crown. , 1998, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  Kazumichi Wakabayashi,et al.  Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. , 2003, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[10]  P Pera,et al.  In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. , 1994, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  C J Goodacre,et al.  A comparative study of the strength of aluminous porcelain jacket crowns constructed with the conventional and twin foil technique. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  R Scotti,et al.  A clinical evaluation of In-Ceram crowns. , 1995, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[13]  J Chai,et al.  A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress, and Procera crowns. , 1997, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[14]  Riley Ej Ceramo-metal restoration. State of the science. , 1977 .

[15]  V Piddock,et al.  In vitro comparison of conventional crowns and a new all-ceramic system. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  J. Hwang,et al.  Fracture strength of copy-milled and conventional In-Ceram crowns. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[17]  T Nakamura,et al.  In vitro fitting accuracy of copy-milled alumina cores and all-ceramic crowns. , 2000, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[18]  L Pröbster,et al.  Four year clinical study of glass-infiltrated, sintered alumina crowns. , 1996, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[19]  J W McLean,et al.  The science and art of dental ceramics. , 1991, Operative dentistry.

[20]  S. Bayne,et al.  Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[21]  Stig Karlsson,et al.  Precision of a CAD/CAM technique for the production of zirconium dioxide copings. , 2004, The International journal of prosthodontics.