Are some groups more vulnerable to macroeconomic shocks than others

Abstract Which socio-economic groups are most vulnerable to welfare declines during a macroeconomic shock? After clarifying the difference between poverty and vulnerability, this paper presents an analytical framework and applies it to panel data from Peru. Major findings are: (1) Households with better educated heads are less vulnerable; (2) Female headed households are no more vulnerable than male headed households; (3) Households with more children are more vulnerable; (4) Transfer networks that assist the poor in relatively stable periods do not protect them during a major shock, unless they originate from outside Peru; and (5) Peru's social security program is targeted neither to vulnerable nor to poor households, but other transfer programs are better targeted.

[1]  J. Musgrove Family and community health in a new medical school , 1990, Medical education.

[2]  G. Hall,et al.  Who is Most Vulnerable to Macroeconomic Shocks?: Hypotheses Tests Using Panel Data from Peru , 1995 .

[3]  M. Grosh Administering Targeted Social Programs in Latin America: From Platitudes to Practice , 1994 .

[4]  James P. Grant,et al.  Adjustment with a human face , 1987 .

[5]  E. King Does Education Pay in the Labor Market: The Labor Force Participation, Occupation, and Earnings of Peruvian Women , 1989 .

[6]  G. Becker,et al.  Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  H. Alderman,et al.  Do the poor insure? A synthesis of the literature on risk and consumption in developing countries , 1992 .

[8]  P. Musgrove,et al.  Education and earnings in Peru's informal nonfarm family enterprises , 1989 .

[9]  R. Kanbur,et al.  How Serious Is The Neglectof Intra-Household Inequality? , 1989 .

[10]  Paul Glewwe,et al.  Poverty, Inequality, and Living Standards during Unorthodox Adjustment: The Case of Peru, 1985-1990 , 1994, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[11]  Donald Cox Motives for Private Income Transfers , 1987, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Wage Inequality and the Rise in Returns to Skill , 1993, Journal of Political Economy.

[13]  R. Kanbur,et al.  How serious is the neglect of intrahousehold inequality , 1990 .

[14]  Donald Cox,et al.  Achieving Social Objectives through Private Transfers: A Review , 1990 .

[15]  C. Meghir,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF MALE AND FEMALE LABOR SUPPLY ON COMMODITY DEMANDS , 1991 .

[16]  Wage determinants and school attainment among men in Peru , 1987 .

[17]  A. Deaton,et al.  Saving in Developing Countries: Theory and Review , 1989 .

[18]  M. Ravallion,et al.  Poverty and household size , 1994 .

[19]  H. White A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[20]  Richard Jolly,et al.  Adjustment with a Human Face: Volume 1, Protecting the Vulnerable and Promoting Growth , 1987 .