Method for selection of optimal road safety composite index with examples from DEA and TOPSIS method.

Concept of composite road safety index is a popular and relatively new concept among road safety experts around the world. As there is a constant need for comparison among different units (countries, municipalities, roads, etc.) there is need to choose an adequate method which will make comparison fair to all compared units. Usually comparisons using one specific indicator (parameter which describes safety or unsafety) can end up with totally different ranking of compared units which is quite complicated for decision maker to determine "real best performers". Need for composite road safety index is becoming dominant since road safety presents a complex system where more and more indicators are constantly being developed to describe it. Among wide variety of models and developed composite indexes, a decision maker can come to even bigger dilemma than choosing one adequate risk measure. As DEA and TOPSIS are well-known mathematical models and have recently been increasingly used for risk evaluation in road safety, we used efficiencies (composite indexes) obtained by different models, based on DEA and TOPSIS, to present PROMETHEE-RS model for selection of optimal method for composite index. Method for selection of optimal composite index is based on three parameters (average correlation, average rank variation and average cluster variation) inserted into a PROMETHEE MCDM method in order to choose the optimal one. The model is tested by comparing 27 police departments in Serbia.

[1]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[2]  R Allsop,et al.  2010 road safety target outcome: 100,000 fewer deaths since 2001: 5th road safety PIN report , 2011 .

[3]  Jean Pierre Brans,et al.  HOW TO SELECT AND HOW TO RANK PROJECTS: THE PROMETHEE METHOD , 1986 .

[4]  P. Vincke,et al.  Note-A Preference Ranking Organisation Method: The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making , 1985 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[6]  Geert Wets,et al.  Combining road safety information in a performance index. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Elke Hermans,et al.  A methodology for developing a composite road safety performance index for cross-coountry comparison , 2009 .

[8]  Geert Wets,et al.  Traffic fatality indicators in Brazil: State diagnosis based on data envelopment analysis research. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  S. Houwing,et al.  Benchmarking road safety performance by grouping local territories: A study in the Netherlands , 2015 .

[10]  Davy Janssens,et al.  Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation , 2012, Knowl. Based Syst..

[11]  Fred Wegman,et al.  Benchmarking Road Safety Performances of Countries , 2010 .

[12]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[13]  Geert Wets,et al.  Benchmarking road safety: lessons to learn from a data envelopment analysis. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Saltelli Andrea,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer , 2008 .

[15]  Dalibor Pešić,et al.  New method for benchmarking traffic safety level for the territory , 2013 .

[16]  Jianjun Wang,et al.  Road safety risk evaluation by means of improved entropy TOPSIS–RSR , 2015 .

[17]  Tom Brijs,et al.  Road safety risk evaluation and target setting using data envelopment analysis and its extensions. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  Shuangzhe Liu,et al.  Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer by Andrea Saltelli, Marco Ratto, Terry Andres, Francesca Campolongo, Jessica Cariboni, Debora Gatelli, Michaela Saisana, Stefano Tarantola , 2008 .

[20]  Kira Hyldekær Janstrup,et al.  Road Safety Annual Report 2017 , 2017 .

[21]  Geert Wets,et al.  A generalized multiple layer data envelopment analysis model for hierarchical structure assessment: A case study in road safety performance evaluation , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[22]  David Shinar,et al.  Evaluating the efficiency of local municipalities in providing traffic safety using the Data Envelopment Analysis. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[23]  Dalibor Pešić,et al.  Selection of a relevant indicator - Road casualty risk based on final outcomes , 2013 .