Hybrid analytical and computational optimization methodology for structural shaping: Material-efficient mass timber beams

Abstract The building sector is responsible for a large portion of the global CO2e emissions. With structural materials accounting for a large part of it, the reduction of material used in buildings offers an important mitigation option to climate change. Standardized structural elements (eg. columns, beams, floors) have very low material efficiencies, as their shape does not consider the final use and load cases. New digital manufacturing technologies emerging in the field of construction and architecture, open new opportunities for the design of mass-customized structural elements, with the potential for more efficient use of materials in ubiquitous constructions. This paper offers a shaping methodology for the optimization of structural elements based on computational geometry and analytical mechanics. The paper implements the methodology for the shape optimization of mass timber beams. The methodology reveals that a large amount of structural material could be saved on standard structural timber elements. The accuracy of the solutions is benchmarked against analytical solutions and Finite Element Analysis (FEM). In order to implement the methodology for the optimization of timber beams, the analytical mechanics of shaped solid wooden beams are expanded from the existing literature and are presented in this paper. With the potential of being applied to a wider range of material systems, the methodology can significantly decrease the material consumption in a wide range of structural elements. Finally, the resulting optimized geometries demonstrate new objectives for the development of digital manufacturing techniques of mass-customized structures for the implementation in standard buildings.

[1]  Giovanni De Micheli,et al.  Design Space Exploration , 1992 .

[2]  Mark E. Botkin,et al.  Optimum Shape: Automated Structural Design , 1986 .

[3]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  Materials and the Environment: Eco-informed Material Choice , 2009 .

[4]  R. Madlener,et al.  The Role of Wood Material for Greenhouse Gas Mitigation , 2006 .

[5]  Timothy Ibell,et al.  Optimised Beam Design Using Innovative Fabric-Formed Concrete , 2010 .

[6]  Bruno A. Boley,et al.  On the Accuracy of the Bernoulli-Euler Theory for Beams of Variable Section , 1963 .

[7]  Jeroen Coenders,et al.  Design and optimization of fabric‐formed beams and trusses: evolutionary algorithms and form‐finding , 2011 .

[8]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings , 2006 .

[9]  Waclaw Zalewski,et al.  Shaping Structures: Statics , 1997 .

[10]  F. Auricchio,et al.  Modeling the non-trivial behavior of anisotropic beams: A simple Timoshenko beam with enhanced stress recovery and constitutive relations , 2019, Composite Structures.

[11]  M. Powell A Direct Search Optimization Method That Models the Objective and Constraint Functions by Linear Interpolation , 1994 .

[12]  George I. N. Rozvany,et al.  Structural Design via Optimality Criteria: The Prager Approach to Structural Optimization , 1989 .

[13]  Ulrich Dangel,et al.  Turning Point in Timber Construction: A New Economy , 2016 .

[14]  O. G. Privalova,et al.  The Lagrange problem on an optimal column: old and new results , 2003 .

[15]  M. Imam Three‐dimensional shape optimization , 1982 .

[16]  Andrew Liew,et al.  Design, fabrication and testing of a prototype, thin-vaulted, unreinforced concrete floor , 2017 .

[17]  Phil Purnell,et al.  Material nature versus structural nurture: the embodied carbon of fundamental structural elements. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  M. Bendsøe,et al.  Topology Optimization: "Theory, Methods, And Applications" , 2011 .

[19]  David P. Billington The Art of Structural Design: A Swiss Legacy , 2003 .

[20]  M. Curbach,et al.  Design optimization to increase the (buckling) stability of concrete columns , 2017 .

[21]  Christopher Beorkrem Material Strategies in Digital Fabrication , 2012 .

[22]  R. Haftka,et al.  Structural shape optimization — a survey , 1986 .

[23]  Martin Tamke,et al.  New Workflows for Digital Timber , 2019 .

[24]  S. Timoshenko History of strength of materials , 1953 .

[25]  Josef Eberhardsteiner,et al.  Non-prismatic beams: A simple and effective Timoshenko-like model , 2016 .

[26]  M.Sc. G.B. Saksena Shear Stress in a Tapering Beam , 1944 .

[27]  Ferdinando Auricchio,et al.  Serviceability Analysis of Non-Prismatic Timber Beams: Derivation and Validation of New and Effective Straightforward Formulas , 2017 .

[28]  Timothy Ibell,et al.  Design methods for flexibly formed concrete beams , 2014 .

[29]  Mark West The Fabric Formwork Book: Methods for Building New Architectural and Structural Forms in Concrete , 2016 .

[30]  T. Hughes,et al.  Isogeometric analysis : CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry and mesh refinement , 2005 .

[31]  S. Timoshenko,et al.  Theory of elasticity , 1975 .

[32]  Timothy Ibell,et al.  Flexible formwork technologies – a state of the art review , 2016 .

[33]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns , 2011 .

[34]  V. Braibant,et al.  Shape optimal design using B-splines , 1984 .

[35]  William Prager,et al.  A General Theory of Optimal Plastic Design , 1967 .