Ultrasound‐contrast‐agent dispersion and velocity imaging for prostate cancer localization

&NA; Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second‐leading cause of cancer death in men; however, reliable tools for detection and localization are still lacking. Dynamic Contrast Enhanced UltraSound (DCE‐US) is a diagnostic tool that is suitable for analysis of vascularization, by imaging an intravenously injected microbubble bolus. The localization of angiogenic vascularization associated with the development of tumors is of particular interest. Recently, methods for the analysis of the bolus convective dispersion process have shown promise to localize angiogenesis. However, independent estimation of dispersion was not possible due to the ambiguity between convection and dispersion. Therefore, in this study we propose a new method that considers the vascular network as a dynamic linear system, whose impulse response can be locally identified. To this end, model‐based parameter estimation is employed, that permits extraction of the apparent dispersion coefficient (D), velocity (v), and Péclet number (Pe) of the system. Clinical evaluation using data recorded from 25 patients shows that the proposed method can be applied effectively to DCE‐US, and is able to locally characterize the hemodynamics, yielding promising results (receiver‐operating‐characteristic curve area of 0.84) for prostate cancer localization. HighlightsA novel contrast‐ultrasound method is proposed for prostate cancer localization.Independent estimation of dispersion and velocity of ultrasound contrast agents.Tumors show increased velocity estimates, and reduced dispersion estimates.Clinical evaluation on 25 patients yields promising results (ROC area 0.84). Graphical abstract Figure. No caption available.

[1]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  3D surface-based registration of ultrasound and histology in prostate cancer imaging , 2016, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..

[2]  Francis P. Chinard,et al.  A Convection-Diffusion Model of Indicator Transport through an Organ , 1968 .

[3]  G. Stewart,et al.  Researches on the Circulation Time and on the Influences which affect it , 1897, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Anne L. Martel,et al.  Hepatic Perfusion Imaging Using Factor Analysis of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  M. Brawer,et al.  Quantitative microvessel density: A staging and prognostic marker for human prostatic carcinoma , 1996, Cancer.

[6]  S. Kaul,et al.  Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Gillies,et al.  Causes and effects of heterogeneous perfusion in tumors. , 1999, Neoplasia.

[8]  L. G. Leal,et al.  Advanced Transport Phenomena: Fluid Mechanics and Convective Transport Processes , 2007 .

[9]  Ulrike M. Hamper,et al.  Breast Ultrasound: A Systematic Approach to Technique and Image Interpretation , 1999 .

[10]  Yair Lotan,et al.  Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy. , 2013, European urology.

[11]  Tong San Koh,et al.  Assessment of perfusion by dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging using a deconvolution approach based on regression and singular value decomposition , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  William J Catalona,et al.  Serial biopsy results in prostate cancer screening study. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[13]  Edward J. Wegman,et al.  Statistical Signal Processing , 1985 .

[14]  David Cosgrove,et al.  Imaging of perfusion using ultrasound , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  Volker Hietschold,et al.  Comment on "Developing DCE-CT to Quantify Intra-Tumor Heterogeneity in Breast Tumors With Differing Angiogenic Phenotype , 2009 .

[16]  S. Whitaker.  Diffusion and dispersion in porous media , 1967 .

[17]  W Blumenfeld,et al.  Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. , 1993, The American journal of pathology.

[18]  N de Jong,et al.  Detection procedures of ultrasound contrast agents. , 2000, Ultrasonics.

[19]  Rodolfo Montironi,et al.  Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2003, European urology.

[20]  W Siegenthaler,et al.  Red blood cell velocity in nailfold capillaries of man measured by a television microscopy technique. , 1974, Microvascular research.

[21]  Muhammad Sahimi,et al.  Flow and Transport in Porous Media and Fractured Rock: From Classical Methods to Modern Approaches , 1995 .

[22]  M. Mischi,et al.  Contrast echocardiography for cardiac quantifications , 2004 .

[23]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[24]  Roy D. Yates,et al.  Probability and stochastic processes , 1998 .

[25]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[26]  Thomas Kailath,et al.  Detection of signals by information theoretic criteria , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[27]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  4-D spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent dispersion for prostate cancer localization: a feasibility study , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[28]  W. Hamilton,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS DETERMINATION OF THE PULMONARY AND SYSTEMIC CIRCULATION TIMES IN MAN AND OF A FIGURE RELATED TO THE CARDIAC OUTPUT , 1928 .

[29]  D. Gleason,et al.  Histologic grading of prostate cancer: a perspective. , 1992, Human pathology.

[30]  Nathan Lawrentschuk,et al.  Transperineal biopsy of the prostate—is this the future? , 2013, Nature Reviews Urology.

[31]  M Bolla,et al.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. , 2001, European urology.

[32]  J Leinonen,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen. , 1999, Seminars in cancer biology.

[33]  N de Jong,et al.  Counter-propagating wave interaction for contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  P Altmeyer,et al.  Capillary blood cell velocity in human skin capillaries located perpendicularly to the skin surface: measured by a new laser Doppler anemometer. , 1996, Microvascular research.

[35]  G. Rosner,et al.  A comparison of tumor and normal tissue microvascular hematocrits and red cell fluxes in a rat window chamber model. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[36]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Contrast-Ultrasound Diffusion Imaging for Localization of Prostate Cancer , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[37]  M. Mischi,et al.  Contrast-ultrasound dispersion imaging for prostate cancer localization by improved spatiotemporal similarity analysis. , 2013, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[38]  D. Carter,et al.  Correlation of Doppler US tumor signals with neovascular morphologic features. , 1988, Radiology.

[39]  S. Zacks.  The theory of statistical inference , 1972 .

[40]  R K Jain,et al.  Endothelial cell death, angiogenesis, and microvascular function after castration in an androgen-dependent tumor: role of vascular endothelial growth factor. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  J. Folkman.  Role of angiogenesis in tumor growth and metastasis. , 2002, Seminars in oncology.

[42]  J F Gross,et al.  Morphologic and hemodynamic comparison of tumor and healing normal tissue microvasculature. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[43]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Correspondence - Spatiotemporal correlation of ultrasound contrast agent dilution curves for angiogenesis localization by dispersion imaging , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[44]  Hendrikus H. M. Korsten,et al.  Maximum-Likelihood Estimation for Indicator Dilution Analysis , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[45]  S. Feinstein,et al.  The powerful microbubble: from bench to bedside, from intravascular indicator to therapeutic delivery system, and beyond. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[46]  G. Taylor.  Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly through a tube , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[47]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[48]  Marcel Breeuwer,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Dispersion Imaging for Localization of Angiogenesis and Cancer Growth , 2014, Investigative radiology.

[49]  D. Duffy.  Green's Functions with Applications , 2015 .