An innovative non-invasive technique for subcutaneous tumour measurements

Introduction In oncological drug development, animal studies continue to play a central role in which the volume of subcutaneous tumours is monitored to assess the efficacy of new drugs. The tumour volume is estimated by taking the volume to be that of a regular spheroid with the same dimensions. However, this method is subjective, insufficiently traceable, and is subject to error in the accuracy of volume estimates as tumours are frequently irregular. Methods & results This paper reviews the standard technique for tumour volume assessment, calliper measurements, by conducting a statistical review of a large dataset consisting of 2,500 tumour volume measurements from 1,600 mice by multiple operators across 6 mouse strains and 20 tumour models. Additionally, we explore the impact of six different tumour morphologies on volume estimation and the detection of treatment effects using a computational tumour growth model. Finally, we propose an alternative method to callipers for estimating volume–BioVolumeTM, a 3D scanning technique. BioVolume simultaneously captures both stereo RGB (Red, Green and Blue) images from different light sources and infrared thermal images of the tumour in under a second. It then detects the tumour region automatically and estimates the tumour volume in under a minute. Furthermore, images can be processed in parallel within the cloud and so the time required to process multiple images is similar to that required for a single image. We present data of a pre-production unit test consisting of 297 scans from over 120 mice collected by four different operators. Conclusion This work demonstrates that it is possible to record tumour measurements in a rapid minimally invasive, morphology-independent way, and with less human-bias compared to callipers, whilst also improving data traceability. Furthermore, the images collected by BioVolume may be useful, for example, as a source of biomarkers for animal welfare and secondary drug toxicity / efficacy.

[1]  T. Delespierre,et al.  Empirical advances with text mining of electronic health records , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[2]  M. Tomayko,et al.  Determination of subcutaneous tumor size in athymic (nude) mice , 2004, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[3]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[4]  Mitsuaki Tatsumi,et al.  Tumor response assessment is more robust with sequential CT scanning than external caliper measurements. , 2005, Academic radiology.

[5]  D. Euhus,et al.  Tumor measurement in the nude mouse , 1986, Journal of surgical oncology.

[6]  Johan Gustav Bellika,et al.  Secure and scalable deduplication of horizontally partitioned health data for privacy-preserving distributed statistical computation , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[7]  R. Coffey,et al.  Volume of Preclinical Xenograft Tumors Is More Accurately Assessed by Ultrasound Imaging Than Manual Caliper Measurements , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[8]  J. A. Delgado-SanMartin,et al.  Multiscalar cellular automaton simulates in-vivo tumour-stroma patterns calibrated from in-vitro assay data , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[9]  Chengli Song,et al.  Thermographic assessment of tumor growth in mouse xenografts , 2007, International journal of cancer.

[10]  Javier Díaz,et al.  Spatial and temporal constraints in variational correspondence methods , 2011, Machine Vision and Applications.

[11]  George F. Reed,et al.  Use of Coefficient of Variation in Assessing Variability of Quantitative Assays , 2002, Clinical and Vaccine Immunology.

[12]  I. C. Girit,et al.  A structured light-based system for scanning subcutaneous tumors in laboratory animals. , 2008, Comparative medicine.

[13]  J A Delgado San Martin,et al.  Non-invasive 3D time-of-flight imaging technique for tumour volume assessment in subcutaneous models , 2015, Laboratory animals.

[14]  Tonino Pisanu,et al.  A new biometric tool for three-dimensional subcutaneous tumor scanning in mice. , 2014, In vivo.

[15]  Sinan Kalkan,et al.  Disparity disambiguation by fusion of signal- and symbolic-level information , 2010, Machine Vision and Applications.

[16]  B. Cornelissen,et al.  Subcutaneous tumor volume measurement in the awake, manually restrained mouse using MRI , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[17]  Mette Jensen,et al.  Tumor volume in subcutaneous mouse xenografts measured by microCT is more accurate and reproducible than determined by 18F-FDG-microPET or external caliper , 2008, BMC Medical Imaging.

[18]  Griffin M. Weber,et al.  BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  H. Ugail,et al.  The use of thermographic imaging to evaluate therapeutic response in human tumour xenograft models , 2016, Scientific Reports.