Dynamic Changes of Cauda Equina Motion Before and After Decompressive Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Redundant Nerve Roots: Cauda Equina Activation Sign

Study Design: Cross-sectional observational study (consecutive case series). Objectives: The aim of this study was to define a criterion for achieving successful decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using intraoperative ultrasonography (IOUS) and to investigate the pathogenesis of redundant nerve roots (RNRs) based on the ultrasonographic findings. Methods: A total of 100 LSS patients (71 males, 29 females, mean age, 71 ± 8 years) with RNRs were enrolled as subjects in this study. IOUS was performed to evaluate pulsatile motion of the cauda equina (PMCE) just before and after decompressive laminectomy. To determine the decompression status of the cauda equina, the ultrasonographic findings were classified into 3 types on the basis of the presence or absence of PMCE: type 1, predecompression PMCE (−) to postdecompression PMCE (+); type 2, pre- and postdecompression PMCE (+); and type 3, pre- and postdecompression PMCE (−). The pathogenesis of RNRs was also investigated based on the ultrasonographic findings. Results: Around the stenosis, PMCE was almost always absent before decompression and appeared after decompression (type 1 in 94 patients, type 2 in 6, type 3 in 0). IOUS showed that, before decompression, the cauda equina was held at the stenosis and could not pulsate beyond the stenotic site, and after decompression, PMCE recovered in the craniocaudal direction, leading to the resolution of RNRs. Conclusions: The emergence of PMCE can be a sign of successful decompression for LSS. Ultrasonographic findings support the notion that disturbance of PMCE around the stenosis is a basic component of the pathogenesis of RNRs.

[1]  Yue Zhu,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on the Clinical Significance of Redundant Nerve Roots in Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. , 2017, World neurosurgery.

[2]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Psychometric Assessment of the Japanese Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ): Reliability and Validity , 2016, PloS one.

[3]  Huihao Zhang,et al.  Post-surgical functional recovery, lumbar lordosis, and range of motion associated with MR-detectable redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis , 2016, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[4]  T. Kuroiwa,et al.  Clinical significance of postoperative changes in redundant nerve roots after decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[5]  M. Nogueira-Barbosa,et al.  Cauda equina redundant nerve roots are associated to the degree of spinal stenosis and to spondylolisthesis. , 2014, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[6]  J. Hur,et al.  Radiological Significance of Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy in the Occurrence of Redundant Nerve Roots of Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 2012, Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society.

[7]  M. Szpalski,et al.  A decade’s experience in lumbar spine surgery in Belgium: sickness fund beneficiaries, 2000–2009 , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[8]  Constantin Schizas,et al.  Qualitative Grading of Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Based on the Morphology of the Dural Sac on Magnetic Resonance Images , 2010, Spine.

[9]  Kozo Nakamura,et al.  Intraoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of posterior decompression via laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: correlation with 2-year follow-up results. , 2010, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[10]  Jeffrey G Jarvik,et al.  Trends, major medical complications, and charges associated with surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in older adults. , 2010, JAMA.

[11]  J. Jang,et al.  Clinical significance of redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina in lumbar spinal stenosis , 2008, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[12]  F. Suetsuna,et al.  Clinical significance of the redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina documented on magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[13]  Y. Toyama,et al.  Lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis. Technical note. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[14]  G. Németh,et al.  Spinal stenosis surgery in Sweden 1987–1999 , 2003, European Spine Journal.

[15]  R A Deyo,et al.  An Assessment of Surgery for Spinal Stenosis: Time Trends, Geographic Variations, Complications, and Reoperations , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[16]  V. Sonntag,et al.  Is Fusion Indicated for Lumbar Spinal Disorders? , 1995, Spine.

[17]  Y. Hashizume,et al.  Redundant nerve roots of the cauda equina: clinical aspects and consideration of pathogenesis. , 1989, Neurosurgery.

[18]  H. Tsuji,et al.  Redundant Nerve Roots in Patients with Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis , 1985, Spine.

[19]  Y. Hertzanu,et al.  Migratory redundant lumbar nerve roots. A case report. , 1984, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[20]  G. Ehni,et al.  The "redundant" or "knotted" nerve root: a clue to spondylotic cauda equina radiculopathy. Case report. , 1970, Journal of neurosurgery.

[21]  R. Pawl,et al.  Serpentine myelographic defect caused by a redundant nerve root. Case report. , 1968, Journal of Neurosurgery.

[22]  H. Verbiest A radicular syndrome from developmental narrowing of the lumbar vertebral canal. , 1954, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.